When a person defends a misleading point of view they don’t even understand… that’s unintentional gaslighting. As Bitcoiners, we face it all the time with normies.

When a person defends a misleading point of view intentionally , well, that’s intentional gaslighting.

The closer you get to a truth that parasites won’t like you to know the more you’ll have to face gaslighting.

Was told just last night that direct funding and subscriptions won’t work and grants are the way.

From someone who seems to be tied to a Nostr player with clear conflict of interest.

Telling me nobody thinks that won’t help

Imagine thinking that grants are the only sustainable way forward.

Did you laugh?

https://neurodivergentinsights.com/blog/how-to-use-pacing-systems

Join the party!

Your tolerance is too damn high

“it’s attention seeking behavior group think are you feeling accepted yet, tell me are you pleasing the leader watching the the mirror repeating each move like a soldier “ nostr:note1wwh67fnzqycw5zk7xht95vt6vzxtpqxh8yvd8lvap92kpmkkm9vqusqk8x

Meh indeed

Lagarde. I was looking at Lagarde

Sounds like a cult

Were you asked to keep emotions such as anger, sadness and disgust muted?

nostr:note1mqhyfk4j83nmsvd4zzef58fw6efs6jf3apwu7nqlzlw45ad5eqcshvz220

It will come, and it will feel like a bail in.

What were you promised if you simply believe?

My bad

Porn, I’m thinking porn

I was promised freedom tech, I found data miners and conflicts of interest.

Matala?

Porn, you’re thinking porn.

Maybe? nostr:note1mm5sp4kvmkcph7julx4se62auv5z50j4qt9zesm824venzql8cnsgk42js

No, you just replied. 😉🫂