Nostr Web Client

Lamp 1y ago

dude wtf lol

?name=image.png

Replying to

Yonle

This is the stupid "second layer protection" that simply does not make sense especially for server applications.

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el I think security is better with KISS principle not with layers and layers of shit making it hard for everyone

Replying to

Lamp

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el IT IS SNAP

I guess snap has some security feature where it blocks read to any file not owned by the process uid

FUCK #SNAP

?name=image.png

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el This is fucking stupid because by running the process same uid as files it can modify them however it wants. It HAS to have different uid to be made read-only

Replying to

Yonle

> snap

Well, fuck.

As it has separate user, Love it or not, it's going to be challenging.

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el IT IS SNAP

I guess snap has some security feature where it blocks read to any file not owned by the process uid

FUCK #SNAP

?name=image.png

Replying to

Yonle

Huh, interesting. Looks like something to do with the deno itself as `cat` works.

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el FWIW snap is involved and it's been known to cause bullshit

Lamp 1y ago

#deno just doesnt fucking work if the file and process uid don't match even though there's no reason it shouldn't (AND THERE'S DEFINITELY REASONS IT SHOULD)

?name=image.png

Replying to

Lamp

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el IT IS ACCESSIBLE

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el fucking idiots

?name=image.png

Replying to

Yonle

Change file owner. It's not accessible if you try `sudo -U bot cat app.deno.js`

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el IT IS ACCESSIBLE

Lamp 1y ago

WHY PERMISSION DENIED

?name=image.png

Replying to

Yonle

Still a block. But doing without bracket is quite similar to this:

```

switch {

let a = 1;

let a = 2; // the error arrives here

case "1":

// ....

}

```

Does not matter if you use let, var, or const tho.

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el So the cases aren't blocks.

Replying to

Yonle

This is basically how JavaScript object works. This is common.

Lamp 1y ago

nostr:npub1x3azxuysp5vmfer4vgs4jn5tmfcx4ew8sh0qnev7gczljxsr7jwqa3g4el What does this have to do with objects?

Replying to

Yonle

Well, in switch, if you are declaring it without bracket, that equals to declaring it into your function, which then creates an error of "Identifies "..." has already been declared".

Because doing this:

```

function () {

switch (...) {

case "1":

let a = 1;

// ....

break;

}

```

Is technically almost the same as the following:

```