What is #bitcoin address reuse?
[via nostr:npub10qrssqjsydd38j8mv7h27dq0ynpns3djgu88mhr7cr2qcqrgyezspkxqj8 with nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u and nostr:npub1j5mp526z5fkz9wkrk6mt5nzu43xndyrwkr8mnqngdqwytgcpc5vqcnsd5c]
Nice Bitcoin pill tip. I like this form of communicate Bitcoin knowledge.
Está un poco feo que yo lo diga, pero esto está quedando de la hostia.
Ando pensando en tratar de pulir al máximo #UtxoPocket y llevarme el portátil a nostr:nprofile1qqs8w4uth79dl594qj50gc043xtf47zvlenaysmzrpwyy7ae6fkvdpgpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uah8sdr con una demo para pillar algo de feedback.
A ver si me da tiempo de dejarlo como me gustaria... Ja vorem.
Testing an old idea: NFC-based transient accounts: accounts that log off as soon as the app goes to the background, deleting all traces of the account from the phone.
It looks like this in debugging speeds: https://video.nostr.build/ef4274d150303fd28f5e7b6b02a7b0102176263dfb1b491969a0caab6b61e6ad.mp4
If you are an activist and if your phone is confiscated, they will never find anything on the phone. Not even your public key.
Walk around with Amethyst installed and an NFC tag hidden in your clothing. When you need to use Amethyst, tap the tag, insert your password and login. Lock the screen to delete everything.
The NFC has a NIP-49 password-encrypted nsec. If you need, destroy and dispose the NFC tag.
Another way would be request pin when opening the app and the possibility of setting up a duress pin (GrapheneOS inspiration) so if I type duress PIN all data is erased.
Altgought not sure if it would solve the same problem.
I haber been here since 2017, I know the history, i develop bitcoin only software and work in the industry, thank you.
Anda, que será? 😁👀
Yo llevo esa pegatina en la carcasa del móvil jajaja
Thank you for your opinion, I respect it but I do not agree. I find the eternal debate and confrontation between extremists of both "worlds" overwhelming.
My aunt says the same thing about Bitcoin, that it is a scam. is she right, why?
Scammers are everywhere, just like people eager to build and develop things on some or other technologies and that doesn't make them scammers.
In fact, there is a Bitcoin channel there, where people who are not so prejudiced also talk about Bitcoin.
Here I only hear about farcaster and anything other than Bitcoin with contempt, and I think that's not healthy or constructive.
I'm around there too, there is an atmosphere of innovation, like it or not, they are people building and developing things.
I don't know if they are scams or not and the truth is that I don't care, but I like technology and I have nothing bad to say about farcaster. There are scammers just like there are scammers in bitcoin.
I have all the checks on the project I am developing. Glad about it! ✅
There are days when working as an employee is really frustrating...
Today is one of those days.
Nope, asked Bitronics, hoping for an answer tomorrow hehe.
I've been reading about it but not much info. There are a couple of old issues speaking about this in github from welding to firmware issues.
https://github.com/skot/bitaxe/issues/139
https://github.com/skot/ESP-Miner/issues/145
At the moment I still don't even know if I can see a log somehow by connecting by cable to the computer or something.., I haven't had time to investigate.
Buen mood mientras desarrollo. Magia musical, los putos amos.
Bitaxe received and plugged in, and "Self test" ad eternum on screen.
I am not very lucky with electronic devices 😬😠
Oh amigo! has sido mi muso jajaja.
Con el comentario de los índices y repasando mentalmente las partes de una ruta de derivación he caído en que solo estaba derivando las direcciones externas y no las internas. He releido BIP44 y se me ha hecho la luz. En mi método de derivación estaba iterando en /0/{i}, pero no en /1/{i}.
Tonto de mi que revisando en Sparrow no había caido en que efectivamente tengo dos UTXOS en dos direcciones externas y todo lo demás son cambios, por eso no los veía.
Respondiendo a tu pregunta, en Sparrow veo una profundidad de 18 sobre un total de 46 direcciones, aunque no se muy bien como expresarlo porque son todas las salidas gastadas y no gastadas (externas) y, por otro lado las de cambio (internas).
I don't like credit, I don't like debt. I prefer the concept of DCA with the qty. I am sure I can afford.
Luego cuando me ponga lo reviso y te comento. Aunque ya me has provocado un pequeño click mental, gracias por el interés!
Es decir, derivo direcciones hasta que en un bloque de 20 no se encuentra ninguna con fondos, entonces paro.
Pues he probado con distintos gap limit, da igual que utilice 20 que 50, luego probaré números mas altos, pero no me cuadra. No se si te refieres a eso.
Por lo que estado viendo 20 suele ser el numero habitual. Echaré un ojo al repo de Sparrow a ver como lo están haciendo.