Reclaiming Bagram Airfield: A Strategic Imperative for U.S. National Security
As global tensions escalate, the United States must reassess its strategic footprint to safeguard national security and counter rising threats. Among the most critical decisions is the potential reclamation of Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan. Abandoned during the U.S. withdrawal in 2021, Bagram offers unparalleled strategic value, particularly in light of growing competition with China and recent directives from Chinese President Xi Jinping for his military to prepare for war by 2027.
A Strategic Foothold Near China
Bagram Airfield’s geographic location in Central Asia provides the U.S. with its closest operational base to China’s western border. This proximity is pivotal in addressing emerging threats and maintaining a competitive edge:
Surveillance and Monitoring:
The airfield enables intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations over key Chinese regions such as Xinjiang, a hub for military infrastructure and human rights abuses.
Proximity to Chinese infrastructure projects like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) allows the U.S. to monitor and, if necessary, disrupt strategic supply lines during a conflict.
Countering Chinese Expansion:
China’s influence in Central Asia is growing, with significant investments in energy and trade routes. Bagram provides a counterbalance, enabling the U.S. to maintain a presence in a region increasingly dominated by Beijing.
Deterrence and Preparedness:
The ability to project power near China’s vulnerable western regions pressures Beijing to stretch its military resources, particularly in a conflict scenario over Taiwan or the South China Sea.
Xi Jinping’s 2027 Directive: A Warning Sign
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s call for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to prepare for war by 2027 underscores the immediacy of the threat:
The timeline aligns with China’s ambitions to reunify Taiwan and challenge U.S. global influence.
Xi’s directive reflects an acceleration in military modernization, signaling Beijing’s willingness to use force to achieve its objectives.
Bagram Airfield positions the U.S. to counter these preparations effectively. By reestablishing a presence, the U.S. can maintain vigilance over Chinese military activities, enhance regional stability, and reinforce its commitment to allies.
A Multi-Regional Advantage
While its proximity to China is a significant asset, Bagram’s strategic value extends beyond this focus:
Monitoring Iran and Russia: Bagram provides a base for overseeing activities in Iran and Russia, both of which are increasing their influence in Central Asia and beyond.
Support for Regional Allies: Reestablishing the base signals a renewed commitment to U.S. partners, such as India and Japan, reinforcing alliances critical to maintaining peace in the Indo-Pacific.
Infrastructure and Operational Readiness
Bagram’s existing infrastructure offers a cost-effective and immediate advantage:
Runway Capabilities: Designed to accommodate large military aircraft, the airfield is ideal for logistics, air support, and rapid troop deployment.
Strategic Location: Centrally positioned to address multiple hotspots, including China, Iran, Pakistan, and the broader Central Asian region.
Reactivating Bagram avoids the prohibitive costs of constructing a similar facility elsewhere while leveraging its established logistical framework.
The Risks of Inaction
Failing to reclaim Bagram Airfield risks leaving the U.S. at a strategic disadvantage:
Unchecked Chinese Influence: Without a foothold in Central Asia, China’s dominance in the region will continue to grow, reducing U.S. leverage in critical geopolitical theaters.
Limited Rapid Response: The lack of a nearby base hampers U.S. capabilities to respond swiftly to crises or conflicts involving China, Russia, or Iran.
https://m.primal.net/NllV.webp Regional Instability: Afghanistan remains a hub for extremist activity and geopolitical maneuvering, with Russia, China, and Iran vying for influence. A U.S. presence at Bagram is essential to stabilizing the region.
Conclusion: A Strategic Imperative
Reclaiming Bagram Airfield is not just a matter of rectifying past strategic missteps; it is a critical move for safeguarding U.S. national security in an era of growing competition and conflict. As China accelerates its preparations for potential war by 2027, the U.S. must position itself to counter these ambitions effectively.
Bagram offers unparalleled advantages for monitoring and deterring Chinese aggression, supporting regional allies, and projecting power in key areas. In a rapidly changing global landscape, reestablishing Bagram Airfield is essential to ensuring U.S. readiness, influence, and stability in the years ahead.
Containment as a Strategic Imperative: Israel’s Approach to Gaza
https://m.primal.net/Nlhw.webp
In the face of ongoing threats from Hamas and its governance of Gaza, Israel’s strategic focus has shifted toward a containment policy that prioritizes security, sovereignty, and long-term stability. This pragmatic approach reflects the reality of dealing with a hostile entity committed to Israel’s destruction. By pursuing a policy of detachment, isolation, and deterrence, Israel seeks to minimize risks while ensuring the safety of its citizens.
Understanding the Context
The relationship between Gaza and Israel has long been marked by violence and mutual distrust. Key dynamics shaping this approach include:
Hamas’s Ideology: Since its rise to power in Gaza in 2007, Hamas has prioritized the destruction of Israel, as enshrined in its charter. Its militant activities—including rocket attacks, border infiltrations, and tunnel construction—underscore this unwavering hostility.
Misuse of Resources: International aid intended for Gaza’s civilian population has been systematically diverted by Hamas to fuel its military operations, often at the expense of basic human needs.
Public Support for Hamas: Widespread backing for Hamas among Gazans complicates any meaningful reconciliation, making the prospect of coexistence untenable.
Faced with these realities, Israel has embraced containment as the most viable path forward. This strategy prioritizes risk mitigation over futile engagement efforts.
Key Components of Israel’s Containment Policy
1. Strengthened Physical Security
A cornerstone of Israel’s containment policy is the establishment of robust physical barriers to protect its borders and prevent infiltration:
Upgrading underground detection systems to neutralize the threat of Hamas’s tunnel networks.
Deploying advanced surveillance technologies, including drones and automated systems, to monitor border activity.
Expanding and fortifying physical barriers to ensure comprehensive coverage of vulnerable areas.
Objective: Enhance border security to protect Israeli civilians and infrastructure from immediate threats.
2. Economic Disengagement
Israel has increasingly prioritized reducing economic ties with Gaza, thereby minimizing opportunities for resource exploitation:
Redirecting Gaza’s trade and supply chains through Egypt, reducing dependency on Israel.
Phasing out Israeli-provided utilities such as electricity and water, encouraging Gaza to develop independent systems or rely on Egypt for these needs.
Objective: Ensure that Israel does not inadvertently enable Hamas’s military operations while encouraging Gaza’s self-reliance.
3. Military Deterrence
Israel maintains a proactive and deterrence-based military posture to neutralize emerging threats:
Conducting targeted operations to dismantle Hamas’s military infrastructure, including rocket production facilities and command centers.
Maintaining rapid-response capabilities to address new threats, such as drone attacks or renewed tunnel construction.
Objective: Deter aggression and limit Hamas’s operational capacity through precision and proportionality.
4. Shifting the Diplomatic Narrative
Israel actively seeks to reshape international perceptions of its actions in Gaza, emphasizing Hamas’s responsibility for the region’s suffering:
Highlighting the diversion of humanitarian aid by Hamas to military purposes.
Emphasizing Israel’s right to self-defense against a group explicitly committed to its destruction.
Advocating for international accountability for Hamas’s actions, particularly from its financial and political backers.
Objective: Build global understanding and support for Israel’s containment strategy while delegitimizing Hamas’s claims to international aid.
5. Avoiding Responsibility for Humanitarian Concerns
Israel asserts that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is not its responsibility, but rather the result of Hamas’s governance and its allies’ support. Suggested measures include:
Redirecting responsibility to Egypt, Gaza’s other neighboring state, for coordinating aid and trade.
Refraining from providing resources that could be exploited by Hamas for military purposes.
Objective: Maintain a firm stance on detachment, ensuring that Gaza’s governance is held accountable for its population’s welfare.
A Pragmatic Long-Term Perspective
While containment addresses immediate security concerns, it also serves as a foundation for managing long-term risks. Key considerations include:
Stabilization: Containment minimizes immediate threats, providing Israel with a secure environment to address broader regional dynamics.
Flexibility for Future Opportunities: By maintaining a defensive posture, Israel creates space for potential diplomatic or strategic shifts that could lead to lasting solutions.
Objective: Use containment as a stabilizing measure while remaining prepared for eventual changes in regional and global conditions.
Conclusion
Israel’s containment strategy toward Gaza is a measured and adaptive response to the persistent threats posed by Hamas. By focusing on physical security, economic disengagement, military deterrence, and diplomatic advocacy, Israel prioritizes the safety and sovereignty of its citizens while distancing itself from Gaza’s internal crises. This approach underscores the principle that Gaza’s governance, led by Hamas, bears responsibility for the region’s future.
While not a comprehensive solution to the ideological and political conflicts, containment provides a practical framework for managing risks and ensuring stability. As the situation evolves, this strategy offers Israel the flexibility to adapt while safeguarding its core interests.
The Fragile Empire: Russia's Descent into Crisis and Strategic Dependency
https://m.primal.net/NlAS.webp
Introduction: Russia's geopolitical landscape is teetering on the edge of a multifaceted crisis, characterized by economic decline, escalating conflict, and a growing reliance on tenuous alliances. The Kremlin's portrayal of strength and sovereignty contrasts starkly with internal turmoil and external pressures. From its complicated relationship with China to its emerging "Axis of Evil" with Iran and North Korea, Russia is navigating a precarious future.
China and Russia: A Relationship of Unequal Partners
Despite Russian propaganda portraying China as a close ally, the trade data reveals a stark power imbalance. In 2024, Russia's share of China's trade stood at a meager 3.9%, while China accounted for 33.8% of Russia’s trade. This lopsided relationship underscores Russia's transformation into an economic vassal of Beijing. President Putin's rhetoric of friendship masks a dependency born out of necessity, as Russia's sanctions-ridden economy relies heavily on Chinese goods and technology.
Critics argue that this relationship diminishes Russia's sovereignty, a point underscored by China's strategic maneuvering. While Putin emphasizes mutual respect, Beijing's calculated dominance tells a different story.
The Ministry of Defense: Echoes of Nazi Ideology
In January 2025, the Ministry of Defense published an article in its official magazine, Army Digest, proposing a new military decoration inspired by Nazi Germany's Infantry Assault Badge. The article cited historical examples from World War II, including the Wehrmacht, to justify the need for immediate battlefield recognition. The blatant reference to Nazi awards sparked controversy, raising questions about the moral and historical implications of such parallels.
This development reflects an unsettling militarization of Russian society, where propaganda glorifies outdated ideals while obscuring the realities of a struggling armed forces.
Drone Strikes and Information Control
As Ukraine intensifies its drone operations within Russian territory, authorities have moved to suppress the publication of amateur footage documenting the attacks. Cities like St. Petersburg have implemented bans on sharing images or videos of drone strikes, with violators facing potential imprisonment or forced conscription. This effort to control the narrative contrasts with propagandists like Vladimir Salvio, who broadcast footage of drone damage while calling for severe punishments against others who do the same.
These restrictions reveal the Kremlin's desperation to maintain public morale amid increasing domestic attacks and highlight the war's impact on Russian soil.
Economic Collapse: Real Estate and Mortgages in Freefall
Russia's economic crisis is starkly visible in its collapsing real estate market. Mortgage rates have soared above 30%, rendering homeownership unattainable for most citizens. In St. Petersburg, demand for new construction apartments has plummeted by 50% in 2024. This downturn signals the early stages of a broader economic crash, exacerbated by declining export revenues and the financial strain of sustaining a war economy.
The Axis of Evil: Russia, Iran, and North Korea
Russia’s alignment with Iran and North Korea has formed a new "Axis of Evil," reflecting its growing isolation on the global stage. These partnerships are driven by necessity rather than genuine camaraderie. Russia depends on Iranian drones and ballistic missiles, as well as potential troop reinforcements from North Korea. However, both nations are playing their own games, exploiting Russia's desperation to secure their interests.
The recently proposed comprehensive partnership agreement between Russia and Iran illustrates this dynamic. Despite shared strategic goals, Iran has refused to recognize Crimea as Russian territory, a clear indication of the limitations in their alliance.
A Year of Turmoil
2024 was a devastating year for Russia. Ukrainian drone strikes intensified, acts of terrorism increased, and the country suffered severe economic strain. The Kremlin’s inability to manage these crises has left Russia vulnerable, both domestically and internationally. With its sovereignty eroded by dependency on China, its economy collapsing, and its alliances tenuous, Russia faces an uncertain future.
Conclusion: The narrative of strength and sovereignty promoted by the Kremlin masks a fractured reality. Russia's reliance on China, its militaristic glorification of historical atrocities, and its new partnerships with Iran and North Korea point to a nation struggling to maintain relevance. As internal dissent grows and external pressures mount, the question remains: can Russia navigate its way out of this crisis, or is it destined to crumble under the weight of its ambitions?
DARVO: Understanding the Tactics of Manipulation and Deflection
In the realm of interpersonal conflicts and accusations, a manipulative response pattern often emerges, aimed at silencing victims and deflecting accountability.
Known as DARVO—an acronym for Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender—this tactic is a psychological defense mechanism employed by individuals when they are confronted with allegations of wrongdoing. Understanding DARVO is critical to identifying manipulation and ensuring justice in situations where the balance of power is skewed.
What is DARVO?
DARVO refers to a specific set of behaviors used to deny responsibility, attack the accuser, and reverse the roles of victim and offender. The goal of DARVO is to create confusion, undermine the credibility of the accuser, and protect the accused from accountability.
Breaking Down DARVO:
Deny: The accused outright denies the allegations, rejecting the facts presented by the accuser. This denial can involve minimizing the harm caused or outright gaslighting, where the accuser is made to feel as though their experience is invalid or fabricated.
Example: “That never happened,” or “You’re imagining things.”
Attack: The accused shifts to an offensive stance, attacking the accuser’s credibility, motives, or character. This step aims to discredit the accuser and paint them as unreliable or malicious.
Example: “You’re just trying to ruin my reputation,” or “You’re the one with issues.”
Reverse Victim and Offender: In this final step, the accused portrays themselves as the victim and the actual victim as the perpetrator. This role reversal is designed to confuse the narrative and garner sympathy for the accused, all while placing the real victim on the defensive.
Example: “I can’t believe you’re doing this to me; you’re the one causing harm.”
Why is DARVO Harmful?
DARVO is particularly damaging because it manipulates the perception of events, distorting reality in a way that makes it difficult for victims to be believed. This tactic is commonly employed by individuals in positions of power—such as abusers, workplace harassers, or public figures—who have a vested interest in maintaining their status or reputation.
Key harms caused by DARVO include:
Victim Silencing: Victims may feel intimidated or ashamed, making it less likely for them to come forward with their experiences.
Reinforcement of Power Dynamics: The accused often uses their social, financial, or institutional power to amplify DARVO tactics.
Re-traumatization: For victims, being attacked and discredited can worsen the emotional harm already caused by the initial wrongdoing.
Contexts Where DARVO is Commonly Seen
DARVO can manifest in various situations, particularly where power imbalances exist. Some common contexts include:
Abusive Relationships: Abusers use DARVO to gaslight their victims, erode their confidence, and deflect attention away from their harmful behaviors.
Workplace Harassment: Accusations of misconduct are often met with DARVO responses to protect careers and reputations.
Public Allegations: High-profile individuals accused of misconduct may employ DARVO in media statements, turning public opinion against their accusers.
Recognizing DARVO and Responding to It
To counteract DARVO, it is essential to understand its tactics and prepare accordingly. Here are some strategies for recognizing and addressing DARVO:
Stay Grounded in the Facts: Stick to the evidence and resist the urge to be drawn into emotional or credibility battles.
Document Everything: Collect records, messages, and other evidence that supports your claims. Documentation can be a powerful tool against DARVO tactics.
Seek Support: Engage trusted individuals or professionals who can validate your experience and provide emotional and legal support.
Call Out the Behavior: When safe to do so, label DARVO tactics for what they are. Naming the manipulation can help others recognize the pattern and refocus on the truth.
Moving Forward: The Power of Awareness
Understanding DARVO is a crucial step toward addressing and dismantling manipulative behaviors. By identifying the pattern and refusing to be silenced, victims can reclaim their voices and demand accountability. On a broader level, fostering awareness of DARVO helps create a culture where manipulation is recognized and rejected, paving the way for justice and healing.
Manipulation thrives in darkness, but awareness is the first step toward shining a light on the truth. Recognizing DARVO empowers individuals and communities to resist its insidious effects and champion fairness, accountability, and support for victims. https://m.primal.net/Nkub.webp
The Hidden Secrets of Bashar al-Assad: A Game of Survival in Moscow
Bashar al-Assad, the embattled Syrian leader, is reportedly living in Moscow under the protection of Vladimir Putin and the Russian state. This arrangement raises significant questions about the motivations behind his asylum and the precarious balancing act between Russia, Syria, and Assad himself.
The Web of Rumors
There’s no shortage of speculation surrounding Assad’s presence in Russia. Reports suggest that Asma Assad, his wife, is seriously ill and yearning to leave her exile behind. Born and raised in London, Asma’s privileged past contrasts starkly with her role as the First Lady of a regime accused of brutal atrocities. Some believe she now regrets her position and hopes to escape, potentially portraying herself as a victim of circumstance.
Meanwhile, another thread of rumors paints a picture of greed and opportunism. KGB personnel responsible for the Assad family’s security are allegedly siphoning off the fortune Bashar brought with him—said to include literal tons of cash and gold. With protection in a dangerous country like Russia costing a premium, it’s not surprising that some officers may be enriching themselves at Assad’s expense, possibly eyeing future mansions in luxury hotspots like the south of France or Miami.
Yet another rumor suggests Bashar’s health is faltering. Claims of food poisoning have surfaced, a reminder that exile in a foreign land is far from safe, even for someone under the Kremlin’s watchful eye.
The Underlying Facts
Behind the swirling rumors, some critical facts have emerged. The new leadership in Syria is pushing for Bashar and Asma Assad’s return to face trial and possible execution. Assad’s presence in Moscow appears to be a thorny issue for Russia, with the future of its military bases in Syria reportedly tied to negotiations with the new Syrian government. Assad’s extradition may be the price Russia has to pay to retain its strategic foothold in the region.
Despite the dangers he faces, Bashar remains alive, fueling speculation about his survival tactics. In the volatile world of exiled dictators, where mysterious poisonings and fatal "accidents" are not uncommon, Assad’s continued existence suggests he holds powerful leverage.
The Secrets That Keep Assad Alive
The most intriguing question is: what secrets does Bashar al-Assad hold that make him indispensable to the Russians? Speculation points to several possibilities:
Evidence of Russian complicity in chemical attacks on civilians during the Syrian civil war.
Knowledge of covert torture programs and clandestine operations supported by Russian agents.
Details about the use of Syrian military bases for drug and weapons trafficking.
Intelligence on operations designed to undermine Western nations.
Such secrets could pose catastrophic consequences for Russia if they were to become public. Assad may be using this knowledge as a shield, ensuring his survival in an environment where his existence is otherwise a liability.
A Precarious Game
Bashar al-Assad’s position in Moscow represents a high-stakes game of survival and diplomacy. On one side, Syria’s new government is demanding justice. On the other, Russia is navigating its strategic interests in the region while grappling with the risks posed by Assad’s potential revelations.
For now, Assad’s life hangs in the balance, sustained by the weight of the secrets he carries. Yet history has shown that even the most well-guarded secrets have a way of emerging. Whether this truth will set Assad free—or seal his fate—remains to be seen. 
Where do you get Monero nowadays?
Come learn about the Red/Green Alliance.
How the Communists & Islamists are working together to destroy western civilization.
The Pivot to Asia: Realigning American Focus to Face the Rising Dragon
For decades, the United States has struggled to balance its global strategic priorities, often at the expense of long-term planning. The thesis of Kurt Campbell’s The Pivot: The Future of American Statecraft in Asia underscores the urgent need for the U.S. to shift its focus to the Asia-Pacific region. However, a series of historical missteps and ongoing challenges have delayed this necessary realignment, leaving the U.S. vulnerable to China’s rise and its ongoing campaign of Unrestricted Warfare against American interests.
The Legacy of Distraction: The Middle East Quagmire
Under the George W. Bush administration, America became deeply entrenched in the Middle East following the events of 9/11. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, while addressing immediate threats, diverted critical resources, attention, and diplomatic bandwidth away from Asia. During this period, China was quietly building its economic, military, and geopolitical power, capitalizing on the U.S. distraction to position itself as a global competitor. The Middle East quagmire consumed American leadership, leaving strategic opportunities in Asia unaddressed.
Obama’s Missed Opportunity
The Obama administration recognized the need for a pivot to Asia and introduced policies aimed at rebalancing U.S. priorities. However, despite promises to extract the U.S. from the Middle East, progress was slow. The enduring conflicts and half-measures left America entangled in the region, unable to fully realign its focus. This prolonged delay gave China additional time to fortify its influence through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), expanding its economic reach and creating debt dependencies across the developing world.
Trump’s Realignment Efforts
President Trump’s administration marked a significant shift toward disentangling the U.S. from the Middle East. Efforts to reduce troop deployments and broker peace agreements indicated a strategic intent to reallocate resources toward countering China. However, Trump’s single term in office cut this strategy short, leaving the U.S. without the momentum needed for a full pivot. The reliance on the Biden administration to complete the withdrawal led to a chaotic and ill-prepared pullout from Afghanistan, further destabilizing the region and tarnishing America’s global credibility.
Biden’s Disastrous Middle East Policy
Under President Biden, the Middle East has spiraled further into chaos. The botched Afghanistan withdrawal created a power vacuum, emboldening adversaries like Iran and non-state actors. Biden’s administration has also been criticized for actively providing funds to Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism, and indirectly supporting groups like ISIS, further fueling chaos and making the Middle East more dangerous. These actions not only embolden adversaries but also demonstrate a reckless disregard for the safety of American allies and interests. Furthermore, the administration’s decision to withhold weapons shipments that Israel has already paid for is an egregious betrayal of one of America’s closest allies. This move not only undermines Israel’s defense capabilities but sends a damaging message to other U.S. arms purchasers, including South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, that the United States cannot be relied upon to honor its commitments.
This withholding of weapons shipments not only weakens Israel’s ability to defend itself but also sends a troubling message to other countries that purchase U.S. arms, such as South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. If the U.S. is seen as unreliable with Israel, nations may seek to develop their own defense industries or turn to alternative suppliers, reducing American influence in global arms markets.
China, opportunistic as ever, has sought to expand its influence in the region through economic investments and diplomatic overtures. Biden’s missteps have forced the U.S. to rely heavily on allies like Israel to stabilize the region. As the Middle East becomes increasingly unstable, the imperative for the U.S. to extricate itself and focus on the Asia-Pacific grows even stronger.
The Rising Dragon: China’s Unrestricted Warfare
While the U.S. has been mired in Middle Eastern conflicts, China has waged an aggressive campaign of Unrestricted Warfare against the United States. This strategy, outlined in a 1999 Chinese military publication, employs non-traditional methods to weaken adversaries. Tactics include:
Economic Subversion: Using trade imbalances, intellectual property theft, and predatory lending to undermine American economic power.
Information Warfare: Spreading propaganda, manipulating social media narratives, and influencing U.S. institutions to sow division and distrust.
Diplomatic Encirclement: Establishing partnerships and footholds in regions like Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East to isolate the U.S. on the global stage.
Military Expansion: Building artificial islands in the South China Sea, increasing naval capabilities, and modernizing its military to challenge U.S. dominance in the Pacific.
The Pivot: A Strategic Blueprint
Kurt Campbell’s The Pivot provides a roadmap for how the U.S. can counter China’s rise and secure its position in the Asia-Pacific. The book’s thesis emphasizes:
Economic Engagement: Strengthening trade agreements and building economic partnerships with Asian nations to counter China’s dominance.
Security Alliances: Reinforcing ties with allies like Japan, South Korea, and Australia while expanding partnerships with emerging powers like India.
Diplomatic Leadership: Investing in regional institutions like ASEAN to promote multilateral cooperation and a rules-based order.
Soft Power and Values: Promoting democracy, human rights, and American cultural influence to counter authoritarianism and win hearts and minds in the region.
Trump’s Second-Term Mandate
With Donald Trump’s second term set to begin on January 20th, his administration faces the monumental task of realigning U.S. foreign policy to address the challenges posed by China's rise. This effort will require bold leadership and strategic foresight to undo years of missteps and distractions. His agenda will include:
This involves supplying Israel with the necessary support to handle regional threats while strengthening alliances in the Asia-Pacific to stand against China. Key allies in the region include Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and India.
Decoupling from China: Reducing economic dependencies, securing supply chains, and investing in domestic industries.
Strategic Focus: Implementing the principles outlined in The Pivot to strengthen America’s position in the Indo-Pacific and counter China’s expansionist ambitions.
Relying on Allies: Partnering with Israel to stabilize the Middle East and ensure that American resources can be redirected toward the Asia-Pacific. This involves supplying Israel with the necessary support to handle regional threats while strengthening alliances in the Asia-Pacific to stand against China. Key allies in the region include Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and India.
Conclusion
The lessons of the past two decades highlight the consequences of strategic distraction. As the U.S. extracts itself from the Middle East and realigns its priorities, the Asia-Pacific must become the central focus of American statecraft. The rising dragon will not wait, and America’s ability to counter China’s Unrestricted Warfare will define the global balance of power in the 21st century. By embracing the strategies outlined in The Pivot, the U.S. can secure its leadership role and ensure a free and prosperous future in the Indo-Pacific.
Join us for Starship flight 7
https://x.com/stealthmedical1/status/1879827297588720028
Join the discussion about the status of the ceasefire agreement.