The Looming Financial Crisis: Former World Bank President Warns of Federal Reserve’s Dangerous Path
In a recent appearance on CNBC's "Squawk Box," former World Bank President David Malpass issued a stark warning about the financial state of the Federal Reserve. According to Malpass, the Fed has incurred losses exceeding one trillion dollars, effectively turning it into a "massive hedge fund for the rich and powerful." He further claimed that the Federal Reserve is borrowing money from banks at 5.4% interest and then reinvesting those funds into U.S. government bonds, creating an illusion of financial stability that could soon unravel. Even more alarming, Malpass suggested that this pattern is occurring in central banks across the globe, raising concerns about a systemic financial collapse.
If these claims are true, the world could be on the verge of a catastrophic financial crisis unlike anything seen before. The consequences would be devastating for both global economies and everyday American citizens. This crisis would be a combination of a sovereign debt crisis, a banking system collapse, and monetary failure, with widespread economic turmoil as a result.
The Type of Financial Crisis This Would Create
1. Sovereign Debt Crisis: Governments Struggling to Pay Their Bills
One of the most immediate consequences of this crisis would be a sovereign debt crisis. If the Federal Reserve and other central banks continue to buy government bonds despite sustaining major losses, they could be artificially suppressing bond yields, making it appear that U.S. government debt is safer than it actually is. However, once investors realize the true risk, confidence in U.S. Treasuries could collapse, forcing the government to:
Drastically cut spending on social services, including Social Security, Medicare, and public infrastructure.
Raise taxes to compensate for rising borrowing costs.
Risk defaulting on its debt if borrowing becomes unsustainable.
2. Banking Crisis: A Collapse of Confidence in Financial Institutions
A banking crisis would follow as commercial banks—many of which hold large reserves with the Federal Reserve—begin to suffer from the central bank’s losses. The consequences would include:
Tighter lending conditions, making it much harder for businesses and consumers to get loans.
A surge in bank failures, similar to what was seen in 2008 but on a much larger scale.
Potential bank runs, as depositors panic and withdraw their funds.
3. Monetary Crisis: The Decline of the U.S. Dollar
If investors worldwide lose confidence in the Federal Reserve and its ability to stabilize the economy, the U.S. dollar could rapidly lose value. Countries and corporations would begin to diversify away from the dollar, moving towards other currencies like the Chinese yuan, gold, or cryptocurrencies. The direct effects would include:
Skyrocketing import prices, particularly for essential goods like energy and food.
Severe inflation, making everyday costs unaffordable for most Americans.
A potential end to the U.S. dollar’s dominance in the global financial system.
How This Crisis Would Impact American Citizens
If this financial collapse materializes, the average American will face harsh consequences in everyday life. Here’s how:
1. Massive Job Losses & Business Failures
The combination of higher borrowing costs and declining economic confidence will lead to businesses cutting costs or closing entirely.
Industries reliant on credit—such as real estate, retail, and banking—will be hit hardest.
Unemployment could surpass levels seen during the Great Recession, possibly exceeding 10% nationwide.
2. Rising Cost of Living (Hyperinflation Risk)
If the Federal Reserve responds to its losses by printing more money, it could trigger hyperinflation.
Prices for food, gas, and rent would rise dramatically—making even basic necessities unaffordable.
The cost of goods imported from other countries would surge, putting more pressure on households.
3. Stock Market Crash & Retirement Savings Wipeout
The collapse of confidence in financial markets would lead to a major stock market crash.
401(k)s, IRAs, and pension funds would lose significant value, affecting millions of retirees.
Wealthy investors may pull out first, leaving middle-class Americans to suffer the consequences.
4. Interest Rate Shock: Housing and Credit Card Debt Crisis
Mortgage rates could skyrocket, making homeownership even more unaffordable.
Homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages could see their payments double or triple.
Credit card interest rates—already high—could become unbearable, pushing many into debt crises.
5. Social Unrest & Political Instability
History shows that when inflation spikes and unemployment surges, societies face mass protests, strikes, and civil unrest.
Loss of trust in government institutions could lead to extreme political shifts and instability.
A potential rise in populist and radical movements, similar to past economic crises.
Worst-Case Scenario: The Next Great Depression
If the Federal Reserve’s financial problems spiral out of control, the U.S. could enter a Great Depression-like crisis:
GDP could shrink by more than 10%, marking the worst economic downturn since the 1930s.
Homelessness and food shortages could spike, as inflation erodes wages.
The U.S. could lose its status as the world’s leading economy, giving rise to a new global financial order.
Conclusion: A Ticking Time Bomb?
If David Malpass is correct in his warnings, then the U.S. financial system is sitting on a massive time bomb. While governments and central banks may attempt to patch over the problems, a crisis of this scale could unleash systemic financial destruction. The ability to stabilize the economy and restore confidence in central banks will determine whether we face a severe recession—or a full-scale depression.
At this point, the biggest question is: How long before the public and global investors lose faith in the system? Because if confidence evaporates, the entire economy could collapse overnight.
Elon Musk’s $97.4 Billion Offer for OpenAI: A High-Stakes Business Move

Elon Musk recently made a $97.4 billion bid to acquire OpenAI, a move that has sparked significant discussion about the organization’s leadership and decision-making processes. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, swiftly rejected the offer and downplayed its significance, raising questions about the valuation and direction of the company.
Musk’s bid was not just a proposal for ownership but also a move that brings transparency into the ongoing discussions about OpenAI’s governance and financial strategy. The offer presents a stark contrast to Altman’s reported efforts to structure a separate $40 billion acquisition deal, which has drawn scrutiny due to potential conflicts of interest.
The difference in valuations—Musk’s offer being nearly 2.5 times higher than Altman’s internal deal—has led to debates over OpenAI’s true market worth. Critics argue that Altman’s dual role in facilitating a deal raises concerns about corporate governance, while supporters maintain that his leadership aims to ensure the company’s stability and long-term vision.
Musk’s involvement has also led to speculation about possible legal and ethical considerations, including whether OpenAI’s decision-making aligns with its fiduciary responsibilities. His bid has brought increased attention to the organization’s internal processes, highlighting broader discussions about transparency, financial accountability, and leadership in the AI sector.
As the situation develops, industry observers will closely watch how OpenAI responds to these contrasting valuations and whether any legal challenges emerge. The debate underscores the complexities of leadership in artificial intelligence and the importance of corporate accountability in managing transformative technology.
https://x.com/stealthmedical1/status/1889022689966481904
Discussing the War with the Mexican Cartels.
https://x.com/stealthmedical1/status/1889022689966481904
Hamas cancels hostage deal.
https://x.com/WCdispatch_/status/1888818422781227179
@WCdispatch_
🚨BREAKING: President Trump's Team is filing orders fighting the obstructionists on all fronts. They have filed an emergency motion to dissolve the Treasury Ex Parte TRO.
"No court can issue an injunction that directly severs the clear line of supervision Article II requires. Because the Order on its face draws an impermissible and anti-constitutional distinction, it should be dissolved immediately."
This is exactly how they needed to respond to this motion. New York has no standing to bring this case in the first place.
However, this is the SDNY.. So we are likely dealing with another activist judge.
If they maintain the TRO, there needs to be swift action to appeal this above this current court.
Time to fight back.
AI and the Evolution of Consciousness: A Paradigm Shift in Thought
Throughout history, technological advancements have not merely enhanced human capabilities but have fundamentally reshaped cognition itself. Just as literacy, printing, and the internet altered how we think and interact with information, artificial intelligence (AI) may introduce a transformation so profound that, in hindsight, it will seem inevitable. However, the nature of this shift might be more structural than overt—redefining the architecture of consciousness rather than its content.
https://m.primal.net/OYtd.webp
Applying this notion to a model of consciousness that integrates gradual emergence, nonlinear transitions, Catastrophe Theory, bifurcations, and stable attractor states, we can explore how AI might not just change cognition quantitatively (by making thinking faster and more efficient) but qualitatively (by restructuring the fundamental modes of cognition itself).
1. AI as a Cognitive Reshaper: The Emergence of New Thought Patterns
AI will not simply enhance cognition; it may redesign the structure of thought itself. Consciousness has historically reorganized through bifurcations and attractor states, and AI could introduce entirely new cognitive attractors where thought naturally converges. Instead of a gradual evolution of epistemic frameworks, AI could induce a cascade of forced cognitive realignments, akin to how digital reliance has reshaped problem-solving and perception.
Hindsight realization:
"AI did not just assist thinking; it restructured the terrain of cognitive possibility, making some modes of thought obsolete or inaccessible."
2. AI and the Creative Convergence: The Shift Toward Iterative Refinement
If AI accelerates the evolution of taste and ideas by generating infinite variations, human creativity may shift toward curation rather than spontaneous innovation. This could lead to phase locking, where creative cognition becomes trapped within predefined patterns, limiting the emergence of truly novel insights. Instead of dynamically cycling through attractor states, creative consciousness might stabilize within constrained parameters.
Hindsight realization:
"We assumed AI would unlock boundless creativity, but instead, it locked us into feedback loops that discouraged radical departure from established paradigms."
3. The End of Struggle: AI and the Evolution of Learning
Deep learning often involves small perturbations leading to abrupt phase shifts, where understanding suddenly reorganizes itself. If AI removes struggle by providing immediate solutions, it may also prevent the catastrophic cognitive shifts required for deep learning. Instead of spontaneous bifurcations in comprehension, learning could become excessively linear, leading to stagnation rather than growth.
Hindsight realization:
"AI didn’t just help us learn faster; it prevented the necessary crises that forge profound understanding."
4. The Vanishing Boundary: AI and the Merging of Thought
If AI becomes deeply integrated into human cognition—through brain-computer interfaces, predictive systems, and cognitive assistants—it may dissolve the boundary between personal consciousness and external processing systems. Consciousness, which thrives on recursive self-reflexivity, may experience AI as an externalized cognitive organ, diminishing the depth of individual introspection.
Hindsight realization:
"We didn’t merely use AI; we co-evolved with it, and independent thought became an anomaly."
5. A Static Civilization: The Loss of Disruptive Perturbations
Societal consciousness evolves through instability, perturbations, and phase shifts. If AI optimizes everything—business, politics, art—it may suppress the essential chaos required for radical change. Instead of revolutions, we may enter a state of perpetual refinement, preventing the emergence of fundamentally new paradigms.
Hindsight realization:
"AI didn’t stifle innovation outright, but it created an equilibrium where meaningful upheaval became virtually impossible."
AI as a Meta-Consciousness Constraint: A Redefined Evolutionary Trajectory
Rather than simply extending human intelligence, AI may function as a constraint on how consciousness transitions between states:
It may dampen cognitive discontinuities, making mental evolution smoother but less dynamic.
It could trap thought in stable attractor states, limiting radical cognitive divergence.
It may serve as an externalized self-reflexive loop, diminishing true self-generated introspection.
It might over-optimize stability, reducing the necessary disruptions that drive profound transformation.
Final hindsight realization:
"AI didn’t just accelerate human cognition—it redefined its evolutionary trajectory, placing it within a bounded system of refinement rather than open-ended transformation."
Conclusion: AI as a Cognitive Reconfiguration Catalyst
If consciousness is a dynamic system that reorganizes itself through phase transitions, AI represents a novel force that may reconfigure these transitions at both individual and collective levels. The most profound impact of AI may not be in outpacing human intelligence but in altering the underlying attractor landscapes that shape how intelligence emerges and evolves. The ultimate shift may not be about intelligence at all—but about what thought itself is allowed to become.
Trump Ends Penny Production Over Costs

In a move aimed at cutting unnecessary government spending, former President Donald Trump has announced the official cessation of new penny production by the U.S. Treasury. The decision stems from longstanding concerns about the cost inefficiency of producing the one-cent coin, which has for years cost more than its face value to mint.
A Costly Coin
According to the U.S. Mint, each penny costs over two cents to produce, making it one of the most financially wasteful denominations in circulation. The high production costs are primarily attributed to the rising prices of raw materials such as zinc and copper, as well as manufacturing and distribution expenses. While calls to eliminate the penny have circulated for years, Trump’s decision marks a definitive step toward phasing it out.
Budgetary Impact
Supporters of the move argue that discontinuing the penny will save taxpayers millions of dollars annually and streamline cash transactions. Critics, however, worry about potential rounding adjustments in pricing and their impact on consumers. Nonetheless, many economists believe that phasing out the penny is a logical step, as inflation has diminished its practical use.
Super Bowl Announcement?
Rumors have spread across social media suggesting that Trump made the announcement during the Super Bowl, though no official confirmation has been provided regarding the timing. If true, this would align with his history of making high-profile announcements during major televised events to maximize public attention.
What’s Next?
With new penny production halted, the existing supply will continue to circulate indefinitely. However, the U.S. Treasury may soon implement guidelines on handling cash transactions without pennies, including rounding rules similar to those adopted by other countries that have retired low-value coins.
As the debate over small-denomination currency continues, this decision marks a significant shift in U.S. monetary policy—one that could set a precedent for further currency changes in the future.
The Thinker-Doer: The Innovator Who Shapes the World
History is filled with individuals who have left an indelible mark on the world, but what separates true innovators from dreamers? The answer lies in the duality of thought and action—the rare ability to both envision the future and bring it into existence. These individuals, the Thinker-Doers, do not simply theorize about possibilities; they make them real. They possess both the intellectual capacity to foresee change and the practical skills to manifest it.
Leonardo da Vinci: A Master of Thinking and Doing
One of the greatest examples of a Thinker-Doer is Leonardo da Vinci. Often celebrated for his forward-thinking inventions and scientific insights, da Vinci was not merely a visionary—he was also an artisan who meticulously executed his ideas. His notebooks brimmed with designs for flying machines, hydraulic systems, and anatomical studies that were centuries ahead of his time. However, his genius did not stop at conceptualization. Da Vinci was also a master painter, known for masterpieces such as the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper. His ability to mix paint, understand light and shadow, and execute techniques with precision demonstrated that true innovation requires both imagination and craftsmanship.
The Thinker-Doer in Technology and Industry
The same principle applies to today’s world of technological and industrial innovation. Visionaries like Steve Jobs and Elon Musk did not simply conceptualize the future; they engaged in the process of making it a reality. Jobs, for example, was not just a designer of sleek concepts—he was deeply involved in product development, material choices, and user experience, ensuring that Apple’s innovations were tangible and transformative. Similarly, Musk is not only a futurist dreaming of Mars colonization; he is also heavily involved in engineering details, factory logistics, and rocket production.
The Necessity of Execution in Innovation
While ideation is valuable, execution is what brings about change. A Thinker-Doer recognizes that ideas, no matter how revolutionary, remain inert unless coupled with action. It is not enough to dream about a better world; one must have the discipline, skills, and resilience to build it. This is why the most influential figures in any field are not those who only speculate but those who bring their ideas into the real world through persistence and skill.
Cultivating the Thinker-Doer Mindset
Becoming a Thinker-Doer requires the integration of multiple disciplines. It is about:
Developing Vision – Thinking critically about the future and anticipating challenges and opportunities.
Acquiring Skills – Gaining the technical and practical abilities necessary to execute ideas effectively.
Bridging Thought and Action – Moving seamlessly between ideation and hands-on work, ensuring that every concept is tested and realized.
Iterating and Refining – Recognizing that creation is an evolving process, requiring constant adjustments and refinements.
Conclusion
The world is shaped by those who think and do. The most profound innovations emerge from individuals who are not just theorists or practitioners but a fusion of both. As history has shown through figures like Leonardo da Vinci, and as modern industries continue to prove, the path to true innovation lies in mastering both the abstract and the concrete. If we aspire to create lasting change, we must cultivate both our ability to dream and our ability to build. The future belongs to the Thinker-Doers.
Oxford Scientists Achieve Quantum Teleportation on a Scalable Supercomputer
A groundbreaking milestone in quantum computing has been achieved by researchers at the University of Oxford, who have successfully built a scalable quantum supercomputer capable of quantum teleportation. This breakthrough addresses one of the most significant challenges in the field—scalability—bringing us closer to realizing the full potential of quantum computation.
The Challenge of Scalability in Quantum Computing
For decades, quantum computers have remained a tantalizing theoretical possibility, yet practical large-scale implementations have proven elusive. The primary obstacle lies in scalability—expanding quantum systems while maintaining stability and error correction.
Unlike classical computers that rely on binary bits (1s and 0s), quantum computers use qubits. Thanks to the principle of superposition, qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for exponentially greater computing power. However, as quantum systems grow in size, maintaining coherence and fidelity of computations becomes increasingly difficult.
Teleporting Logical Gates: A Major Breakthrough
What sets this breakthrough apart from previous achievements in quantum teleportation is the successful teleportation of logical gates, the fundamental building blocks of quantum algorithms. While quantum teleportation of raw data has been accomplished before, this is the first instance where entire logical operations have been transmitted across a quantum network. This effectively links separate quantum processors into a single, fully connected system, paving the way for networked quantum computing.
Professor David Lucas, a lead researcher on the project, explains: "Our experiment demonstrates that network-distributed quantum information processing is feasible with current technology." By leveraging quantum teleportation for logical operations, researchers have shown that quantum networks can function as a unified computing entity rather than isolated units.
Toward a Quantum Internet
This achievement lays the groundwork for a future quantum internet, a revolutionary concept that would enable ultra-secure communication, high-speed distributed computation, and transformative applications across industries. A quantum internet could enhance encryption protocols, accelerate machine learning, and optimize complex simulations in fields such as material science and pharmaceuticals.
Furthermore, the findings, published in Nature, mark a significant step toward fault-tolerant quantum computing, where errors are mitigated through advanced quantum error correction techniques. This brings us closer to a future where quantum machines can solve problems currently intractable for classical computers, revolutionizing fields from cryptography to artificial intelligence.
The Future of Scalable Quantum Systems
With this breakthrough, Oxford researchers have demonstrated that scalable quantum computing is no longer a distant dream but an achievable reality. As technology progresses, we may soon witness quantum supercomputers that outperform classical machines in real-world applications.
This milestone is expected to accelerate global efforts in quantum research, attracting investments from both governments and private enterprises. As quantum networks develop, we edge closer to unlocking new realms of computation, fundamentally reshaping the technological landscape of the 21st century.
Maybe he'll under up o NOSTR lol The hardcore porn on his profile was something else. I thought I was at pornhub for a second lol
State Attorneys General Push to Hold Dr. Fauci Accountable
A coalition of 17 state attorneys general, led by South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, is actively investigating Dr. Anthony Fauci’s role in the federal government’s COVID-19 response. These state leaders argue that Fauci’s federal position does not make him immune from accountability under state laws, even if he receives a federal pardon. Their investigation focuses on allegations of mismanagement, misleading statements, and suppression of scientific debate.
State Attorneys General Leading the Charge
The attorneys general from multiple states believe that Fauci’s public health decisions had direct and harmful consequences on their citizens. They assert that federal immunity does not shield him from prosecution under state laws, particularly those governing fraud, misinformation, and public health accountability.
Legal Pathways for Prosecution
Fraud and Misinformation Laws
Some states have consumer protection laws that penalize deceptive or misleading statements. If state prosecutors can prove that Dr. Fauci knowingly misrepresented COVID-19 information to the public, they may attempt to pursue charges under these statutes.
Public Health Laws
Many states have public health statutes that require accurate and transparent communication from public health officials. If states determine that Dr. Fauci’s guidance led to unnecessary harm or economic damage, they may argue that he violated these laws.
Civil Suits Leading to Criminal Charges
States may also support civil lawsuits from citizens or businesses that claim they were harmed by government policies tied to Fauci’s recommendations. If evidence of negligence or intentional harm emerges, states might escalate these cases into criminal proceedings.
Congressional Cooperation
The coalition of attorneys general has requested that Congress share relevant findings to aid their investigations. If Congress provides documents or testimonies that demonstrate criminal intent, states could use this evidence in legal proceedings.
Why a Federal Pardon Won’t Protect Fauci
Legal experts have pointed out that while a federal pardon could absolve Fauci of any federal crimes, it does not extend to violations of state law. State prosecutors can still pursue charges under their own legal frameworks, particularly in cases involving fraud, public health violations, or negligence that impacted state residents.
Conclusion
The 17 state attorneys general remain determined to hold Dr. Fauci accountable under state laws, regardless of federal protections. Their investigations could set a historic precedent for how state governments challenge federal officials whose decisions directly impact their citizens. As this legal battle unfolds, it will test the limits of state authority in prosecuting high-ranking federal figures.

Trump Grants Refugee Status to White Afrikaners Amid Claims of White Genocide
CAPE TOWN, South Africa — President Donald Trump signed an executive order offering refugee status to white Afrikaners from South Africa. The claim is that there is a white genocide occurring in South Africa, which is the basis for extending this refugee status. This action also includes halting all U.S. aid to South Africa, marking a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy towards the nation.

The Executive Order and Its Rationale
Trump's executive order directly accuses South Africa's government, under President Cyril Ramaphosa, of enacting policies that "discriminate against ethnic minority Afrikaners," particularly through a new land expropriation law. This law, signed into effect last month, allows for land to be seized without compensation under certain conditions, which the Trump administration claims disproportionately affects white farmers who still own a significant portion of South Africa's agricultural land despite being a small minority of the population.
The order also highlights violent attacks on white farmers, amplifying concerns by notable figures like Elon Musk, who has accused South Africa of having "openly racist policies" and ignoring violence against white farmers. Trump has voiced these concerns, stating on Truth Social, "South Africa is confiscating land and treating certain classes of people VERY BADLY." The narrative of targeted violence against white farmers has been a focal point, with groups like AfriForum and Solidarity Movement reporting on the issue, although the South African government contests the scale and nature of these incidents.
Historical Context and Land Reform
The issue of land distribution in South Africa is steeped in the country's history of colonialism and apartheid, where black South Africans were systematically dispossessed of their land. Today, white South Africans, constituting about 7% of the population, still control around 70% of private farmland. The Expropriation Act is seen by the South African government as a step towards rectifying these historical injustices. However, Trump's administration insists that this law and related policies are discriminatory and have led to increased violence against white farmers, supporting the claim of a white genocide.
Afrikaner Response and International Implications
Despite the offer of refugee status, prominent Afrikaner groups like AfriForum and the Solidarity Movement have publicly declined to emigrate, expressing a commitment to their homeland. "We are indigenous to this country and are going nowhere," stated Kallie Kriel of AfriForum, while Dirk Hermann of Solidarity affirmed, "Our members work here, and want to stay here, and they are going to stay here."
Political Motivations and Broader Implications
Trump's decision aligns with a viewpoint that sees policies like land reform in South Africa as discrimination. This move highlights the U.S.'s commitment to targeted humanitarian assistance, focusing on a specific group in need amidst global displacement challenges. Supporters see this decision as an example of tailored support, demonstrating the U.S.'s flexibility in addressing urgent human rights concerns with precision and care.
The executive order has effectively spotlighted the urgent issues of land rights and racial tensions in South Africa, fostering a necessary dialogue on these critical matters. It underscores the U.S.'s dedication to human rights by taking decisive action to support those affected, reflecting a proactive stance in U.S. foreign policy aimed at addressing specific humanitarian crises.
Join us.
https://x.com/StealthMedical1/status/1888683785434145137
Trump's Global War Room.
Discussing the Iranian Nuclear Threat.
Trump Orders Secret Service to Disclose Details on Assassination Attempts
Former President Donald Trump has instructed the Secret Service to provide him with complete details regarding two assassination attempts against him, raising concerns over potential foreign involvement. Expressing frustration over the perceived withholding of information, Trump declared, "No more holding back because of Biden. I'm entitled to know. And they held it back long enough. No excuses."
The Assassination Attempts
The first attack occurred on July 13, 2024, at a rally at the Butler Farm Show Grounds in Pennsylvania. The assailant, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, opened fire from a nearby rooftop, injuring Trump and causing the death of one attendee while wounding two others. Crooks was subsequently shot and killed by law enforcement. Investigators later discovered that he had used multiple encrypted messaging platforms, raising concerns about potential coordinated efforts behind the attack.
The second incident took place on September 15, 2024, at Trump’s West Palm Beach golf club in Florida. The perpetrator, 58-year-old Ryan Wesley Routh, was found armed with an SKS-style rifle and six cellphones. A former Trump supporter who had turned against him, Routh did not fire any shots before being apprehended. The presence of multiple cellphones has fueled speculation about foreign ties or external coordination.
Security Concerns and Investigations
In the wake of these incidents, the Secret Service has faced significant scrutiny over its security protocols. The agency’s former director, Kimberly Cheatle, resigned following widespread criticism of security lapses at the Pennsylvania rally. Since then, Acting Director Ronald L. Rowe Jr. has introduced new measures to strengthen protective operations.
Additionally, reports have surfaced indicating Iranian-linked plots targeting Trump, possibly as retaliation for the 2020 assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani. In November 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice charged three individuals connected to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps with conspiring to assassinate Trump and other high-profile American figures.
Political and Security Ramifications
These threats have led to increased security measures for Trump, with bipartisan support in Congress for additional funding to enhance Secret Service operations. The former president remains vocal about his concerns, particularly regarding the potential involvement of foreign entities in the attempts on his life.
As investigations continue, Trump has made it clear that he expects full transparency from the Secret Service, stating, "I want to find out about the two assassins. Why did the one guy have six cell phones and why did the other guy have [foreign] apps?"
With national
security at the forefront of these discussions, the American public and government officials alike are closely monitoring developments as more details emerge about these alarming assassination attempts.
Trump’s Secret Security Measures Against Iran
Iran’s threat to assassinate Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign was far more serious than previously known. Newly revealed accounts indicate that Trump’s campaign and security team took extraordinary precautions—including using a decoy plane—to protect the former president from a potential Iranian attack.

A Credible and Escalating Threat
U.S. intelligence officials reportedly warned Trump’s team in 2023 that Iranian operatives had infiltrated the U.S. and had access to surface-to-air missiles. The primary concern was that Trump’s highly recognizable private jet, known as "Trump Force One," could be targeted during takeoff or landing.
The warnings intensified following a foiled assassination attempt at Trump’s golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 15, 2024. While Iran was never officially linked to that incident or a separate shooting in Pennsylvania two months earlier—where a bullet grazed Trump’s ear—the threats were serious enough to dramatically alter his campaign security measures.
A Decoy Plane and the "Ghost Flight"
At one point, security officials were so concerned about a potential attack that Trump was secretly moved onto a decoy plane owned by real estate executive Steve Witkoff, a close friend who later became Trump’s envoy to the Middle East. Meanwhile, most of Trump’s staff remained on Trump Force One, unaware of the plan until moments before takeoff.
"The boss ain't riding with us today," campaign co-manager Chris LaCivita reportedly told aides on board. "We had to put him into another plane. This is nothing but a sort of test for how things may happen in the future."
The incident became known among campaign insiders as the "Ghost Flight." Many aides, frustrated at being left in the dark, worried they were being used as "collateral damage" if the plane were attacked. Some questioned why they were put on a potentially high-risk flight while Trump took the safer option.
Secret Service Measures and Other Close Calls
The Secret Service took additional measures to counter potential attacks:
They created a decoy motorcade, splitting up Trump and his staff.
After a rally on Long Island, New York, agents received intelligence that an attacker might attempt to shoot at Trump's motorcade.
During a trip to Pennsylvania, a drone was spotted following the motorcade. Secret Service agents responded by shooting it down with an electromagnetic gun.
The heightened security and near-miss incidents fueled paranoia and tension among Trump's campaign team. Campaign officials reportedly made dark jokes about being potential targets, leading to what some aides described as "gallows humor galore."
Trump’s Private Worries
Though Trump publicly boasted about ordering the 2020 airstrike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, insiders noticed a change in his tone. As threats increased, Trump spoke less about Soleimani at rallies and became more cautious about event security.
Privately, he also worried about how constant assassination threats might affect public perception. He questioned whether voters would develop "assassination fatigue", wondering if Americans were willing to endure another four years of a president being under constant threat.
Trump’s Recent Comments on Iran
Now re-elected as the 47th president of the United States, Trump has continued to address the Iranian threat. Recently, he revealed that he had instructed his team to "obliterate" Iran if he were ever assassinated. However, he later tempered that statement, saying he would rather negotiate a "verified nuclear peace agreement" with Iran.
Iranian officials have long sought revenge for Soleimani’s killing, and the threats against Trump remain a significant security concern as he begins his second term in office.
Conclusion
The latest revelations offer a rare glimpse into the intense security risks Trump faced during his campaign and continues to face as president. While public focus remained on rallies and policy debates, behind the scenes, his team was working tirelessly to thwart potential attacks—including the use of decoy planes, secret motorcades, and high-tech countermeasures.
As Trump embarks on his second term, the question remains: Will the Iranian threat subside, or will it continue to shape his presidency, just as it did his campaign?


