70
anonymous
707918de34e2473336eed90ea847f19db4751b7175d893642684a6aaaf4d9cce
I am rude, because I have been treated (unjustly) like utter crap by a lot of people. If you are nice to me, I will very likely be nice to you.

Is anything "politically" neutral?

Stored in public, accessible for AI to train on and recreate?

If it is actually criticism (as opposed to blatant, unjustified, unsubstantial attacks) I see/take it mostly as a negotiation of sorts usually after searching for the understanding, e.g. different priorities, fix of flaw, lack of possibilities, etc. Then you can simply evaluate whether the criticism makes sense.

I do think in many cases it makes sense for someone to start with questions to understand the ideas first, but that often doesn't happen. (Or provide reasoning and/or context to the criticism, to make it useful.) I found it also isn't always immediately obvious which aspects is emphasized with criticism, especially if (too) concise.

Of course, if they attack the person it's not really criticism anyways.

They have been lying about many, many things.

Tell me concretely what you, what anyone's referring to, because with very high likelihood, the choices they claimed I "made" were deception.

Seems to me like the shark will survive this and it's just illusion brought together by small fishies with big ego πŸ˜…πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜ (sometimes I crack myself up)

No, too shallow. This sounds nice at first impression, but if you think about it, I bet everyone has their own "small things" regardless of circumstances.

This quote just triggers you to think about it.

What people don't realize, is that by attacking the wrong person, you also shift the balance towards undesirable situations. You do not affect just one person.

Sorry, don't know that. Why I'm saying "strict" is because it is in everyone's best interest. Specs get more accurate and precise in expressing what they can and cannot so. Servers/relays can be precise/minimal as possible. Clients can be exact and minimal and without excessive error handling.

Stop whining. You all were too entertained by the lies to search for the truth.

Buy land in the middle of the desert. Probably wild buffalos and such there. No further steps to success. πŸ˜‹

"Dumb strict relays, smart strict clients."

Bad implementations are unavoidable given that it's always a work-in-progress. What we should do, is be extremely strict, report/log errors, and at every instance sort things out and fix the error at the root.

Being too lenient makes control flow obnoxious and complicated where it doesn't have/need to be.

This is an interesting quote. It seems to confirm my (albeit shallow) impression.

You forgot to add: "this is a message for peace. Brought to you by ..." πŸ˜‹