What's this about? What happened?
You're on a roll, aren't you? 😂 Makes me wonder why you haven't yet updated your pfp to match. 🤔😋
Actually, if this is a response to a current event, then you're prly being deceived.
So, basically reverse roles of public key and private key for signing/verification?
Prly good decision. I looked it up. Need to listen to it but never heard of it. 😅😆😂
I don't agree, per se. But too many presentations and tutorials, etc are too superficial. Superficial to the point that you can't extend your capacity for reasoning about something. Sure, practical experience is nice, but it is often too shallow and narrow(ly focused).
For example, https://dannyvanheumen.nl/post/engineering-the-unified-oop-paradigm/ is written based on a significant amount of theoretical knowledge obtained from in-depth presentations and blog-posts, in addition to practical experience in (let's call it) boring, messy business code-base, and my ability to make serious ("experimental" but not that much) changes in an open-source project.
Most people will probably dismiss the post as bullshit, but only because they do not really understand the breadth of the mess and confusion. Incidentally, I know Kotlin coerces some better practices by how they define functions and such.
Also, people who claim I don't have any practical experience are lying and misrepresenting what I have said. Most of the attacks are based on twisted words and misrepresented situations by malicious people who have apparently decided to lie about *everything* they possibly can in an attempt to steal everything away and ruin everything they can possibly manage. Too many people are/were invested in the lies.
I don't agree, per se. But too many presentations and tutorials, etc are too superficial. Superficial to the point that you can't extend your capacity for reasoning about something. Sure, practical experience is nice, but it is often too shallow and narrow(ly focused).
For example, https://dannyvanheumen.nl/post/engineering-the-unified-oop-paradigm/ is written based on a significant amount of theoretical knowledge obtained from in-depth presentations and blog-posts, in addition to practical experience in (let's call it) boring, messy business code-base, and my ability to make serious ("experimental" but not that much) changes in an open-source project.
Most people will probably dismiss the post as bullshit, but only because they do not really understand the breadth of the mess and confusion. Incidentally, I know Kotlin coerces some better practices by how they define functions and such.
If you wonder, but "how do you know?" Well, I've got attacked over numerous issues that I had sibsequently explained in more detail. Instead they had taken just the "yes"/"no" and put it in a different context with twisted meaning.
Also, this is dangerous assumption. I've had to deal with malicious parties who used an answer to a benign question, reframed it and added/changed context and then countered with this. That is not about "dumb normie". That's malicious behavior.
A lesson for normies and a reminder for us. https://video.nostr.build/77095988b5ceab83c4859a8b53968a865bbc01cc55c7c5d0494cb73e8aea01c6.mp4
I guess this is part of it, but .. come on .. this is just extremely sad.
Is it the freedom or is it the capacity for logical thinking and critical thinking?