?name=bPOZa8_4oHDzYw.png
I hope this isn't supposed to be an attack. People tried to do the same claiming that implementing from a spec was trivial. (Even though the spec has its own set of issues.) That too was a pointless, meaningless attack.
For one, I'm not going to break my back coding while also being under constant attack, for two, I tackle the features level by level as planned, for three, I am doing this by myself so I also need to consider and reevaluate the design and plans as I go, for four, bettet to maintain a simple program especially if it must be secure and trustworthy and understandable, for five, there is absolutely no reason to be proud of creating a behemoth of an application with a god-complex if you cannot control it.
I notice that this one always pops up when there is another lie or deception uncovered. Which are the ones this time?
I'm joking. It's well known that it fails because a few on the top can profit at the cost of everyone else.
Not the case when the light is not accepted again and again.
?name=fNRYoua8DLUI9w.pngThis isn't a proper representation. They attacked for years and years, based on lies and false accusations. There was no reason to. It was likely deliberately evil.
I just decided to tell some truth.
It's all coordinated harassment and abuse, and somehow you are all to blind to see what you're contributing to.
What are you trying to prove? The amount of crap I had to take at work? And the coordinated abuse afterwards?
I didn't think that hand gesture was about bitcoin. ๐
I don't believe that. Too often the "cruel" was very deliberate action on part of evil individuals.
They lied. They deceived. They misrepresented information, mixed up people, events, circumstances, names, actions, anything you can think of.
Why did you post it. I am curious whether there are specific reasons, subtext.