70
anonymous
707918de34e2473336eed90ea847f19db4751b7175d893642684a6aaaf4d9cce
I am rude, because I have been treated (unjustly) like utter crap by a lot of people. If you are nice to me, I will very likely be nice to you.

Don't trust. Verify. Support. Build a community with me. Ask questions if you don't understand. Try to invalidate my answers such that we know that either you or me (or both) are wrong.

Sure. I get it. Going per "threatlevel", according to the earlier plan. It's been working for a while. I mentioned before. I've just been absolutely flooded with attacks. Is it that strange that sometimes things are a bit too much, given the absolutely insane amount of undefined, unclear, inexplicable crap that has been going on?

Replying to Avatar Dimi

But it exists. I just haven't tested on prod. That's the point is it? To see that it functions?

I was sleeping. Have they just now been spreading more lies?

How do you do that if there is no communication and they avoid you?

Opt-out usually means you're in by default, right?

For a moment I thought this was a weirdly dressed up Q from Star Trek. 😅

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

I think it's time to address an elephant in the room. This is the little bit I know.

One hint came from nostr:nevent1qqsrakarxarhval5f20arurxapt99qn0nwt69kp50hzpuvf3v74kuwqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7q3quwjejfyn8j0e7t0cx3ys2h4nsk83fq8a6rz7mw2a7z97mnfwvcjqxpqqqqqqzv72wty

But there is something else that's actually more applicable. It may be a subcategory of the above, namely 'anchoring'.

I don't know much about it. From what I understand, it is a way to connect otherwise unrelated (emotional) responses when they happen to occur together often, and in particular when they occur together with a strong (emotional) response.

I've noticed that for the last 8 or so years, there has been a constant flood of harassment and abuse together with lies and false accusations. So it's very likely that this incorrectly connects (emotional) responses. So going by those responses alone to uncover the "truth" means you can essentially uncover any "truth" you want, particularly if you consider a "hidden agenda", given there has been at least 6 years of "playground" for unjustified harassment and abuse, and many, many false accusations.

So, from my understanding, this means "the water" is extremely muddied and untrustworthy, because there clearly has been a lot of manipulation going on.

I think coordination doesn't have the undertone of all working together towards the one goal as is (seems to be) the case with collusion(?)

Replying to Avatar Tiago G

That's easy. It's not primarily about ownership. It's about the availability of resources and capabilities. And lacking a better, more reliable, more trustworthy alternatives, i.e. it's the best we got, I would cripple or handicap myself therefore blocking my ability to contribute in the way I can meaningfully contribute.

So, yeah, this is a somewhat shallow perspective. This would've been a lot more meaningful in Aurelius's time. I get his ideas. I just think it's a simplification that isn't always reachable/feasible in our society.

Maybe, if under controlled conditions. NOT WHEN THERE ARE CONSTANT MESSAGES ATTACKS AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS. It's abuse and manipulation.

Sarcasm doesn't work well with text if no smileys are added.