70
anonymous
707918de34e2473336eed90ea847f19db4751b7175d893642684a6aaaf4d9cce
I am rude, because I have been treated (unjustly) like utter crap by a lot of people. If you are nice to me, I will very likely be nice to you.

Thanks. Still figuring out if they're good for anything. All they seem to exhibit so far is idiocy, and there's a movie about that already.

To specific people: seriously, what is your problem? Why do you think you have the truth? And why do you think you can judge without any proper querying for information?

I'm starting to understand Thanatos's solution.

Seriously, at SOME POINT you have got to admit that you people should be admitted in a mental hospital. YOU HAVE SOME SERIOUS ISSUES.

To some specific people: you know, that "tapping the fence" conversation did not take place in this village. What point are you making? What are you expecting that to mean/do?

By the way, you were drawing conclusions again, weren't you?

To some people: cut the stoicism bullshit. It was a nice suggestion. It has some interesting ideas. Others not so much. You point in still forcing that down my throat.

To someone: are you guessing as to what I'm watching? Don't you think it's a bit rude to invade someone's privacy like that? Please get your nose out of my business. You've ruined enough already.

What are you referring to? It seems I am not informed concerning this conclusion.

Have they been lying again?

To specific people: YES, OBVIOUSLY! BECAUSE YOU ABUSIVE FUCKS ARE CONSTANTLY CRITICIZING EVERY ACTION AND LYING ABOUT IT AND MAKING UP EZCUSES.

No religious person has, in the last 8 or so years, shown me anything praiseworthy.

I stand by my previous statement: people who are intelligent first and religious second have the capacity to do good. Unlike what religion wants you to believe.

Steven Weinberg: "With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion."

Are you responding to any event in particular?

Go home. Your "conclusions" are always based on deception and manipulation.

And, for the record, a few years ago I was asked to save these saving-points stickers for an aunt who was saving up for toys for her grandkids.

If there was a "test", encountering two significantly different people means your "test" has malicious intent.