Avatar
joeVan
7214d84a777a3c1bdf205458a39ecfdc8e6f51294ec1e1a2ebb5d948bd5ebcfb
股市窃贼,btc是啥?

现在就是平衡,加息多少就是一次赌博,我认为美国经济也是冰火两重天,从中国大陆跑调的资金一部分会流入,但产业是回不去的,另外高科技因为美国创新的活力是持续存在,影响不大,所以以目前屌丝人数更多的现状看,加息释放了降低通胀的压力,屌丝一票更重要,所以大选前加息幅度不可小看。

以后值钱,再说现在葱跌价,我的赌牌还没开,等开大小赢了,一定加电击,一定把你击昏过去

坏蛋,用这玩意24小时管着,神马数据分析全来了,最后结果不会好,尤其我这种摸鱼行为会被禁止,这就没意思了,太没劲

我是这么看,数据中心未来就是工业时代的电厂,谁都离不了,后面屁民放个屁都要给云缴钱,每一笔支付,也要缴钱,这可是肥缺啊,年轻点我都想钻进去,那可就是老鼠掉入米缸里喽

20颗大葱,略表鼓励

Replying to Avatar gsovereignty

How to reply to a PoS shitcoiner:

PoS has been around for thousands of years, it's nothing new. Government money is proof of stake, as are company shares.

Egyptians, Romans, and Chinese were using this 2000+ years ago. Italian city states perfected it 800 years ago. Stake based systems are not new.

Using stake to solve the Byzantine General's Problem is also not new. Cypherpunks have been working on this shit since the late 80s.

The cypherpunks on the mailing list (that Satoshi sent the white paper to for peer review) are literally the people who created the *entire body cryptographic of work* used by proof of stake coins today (stake based byzantine fault tolerance). They are well aware of the fundamental limitations of stake based BFT because they are ones who came up with it in the first place...

If Bitcoin was proof of stake *you would never have heared of it* because it wouldn't have survived 5 minutes of peer review by any real cryptographers.

Time-based difficulty-adjusted PoW *is* the breakthrough and is the *only* reason you and anyone has ever heard of a "blockchain".

The failure modes of stake based BFT are well known, and it fails *every time* for a number of reasons, but if you are betting on a shitcoin to increase in value then the failure mode will probably involve the fact that stakeholders have an incentive to increase the supply to benefit from the cantillion effect.

Mathematical fact: you cannot deploy external capital to defend a system that is secured by internal history (stake). This is why stake based BFT does *not* secure against attack by a state or central bank, which means *anything* secured by PoS MUST comply with governments.

Bitcoin's value proposition is that Bitcoin let's you do things that bankers and governments *don't want you to do*. If bankers and governmensts can nuke your shitcoin, then you do what they say or they nuke it.

What's the value proposition beyond CBDCs if your shitcoin ultimately has to comply with governments and bankers?

You cannot out-stake a bad actor who has aquired sufficient stake to fuck with the system, your only option is to fork them out. Then it becomes a competition between charismatic personalities convincing the market to follow their authority (their fork) instead of the other guy.

So how do you solve the problem of removing a bad actor without requiring some form of authority? Read the Bitcoin white paper. Satoshi knew exactly how stake based systems fail, that's *exactly* why he used proof of work instead.

Thanks,I got it,ETH is shit coin ,I will sell it

我说的凶不是指心眼坏,和善良不冲突,是属于两个范畴,褒义讲是杀伐果断,不拖泥带水的意思。可能我的表达有误,包涵

even this is true ,how can Chinese gov control the price to 5k?sell all the coin?they can only control for a while,cannot forever,

巴拉巴西成功定律,关于信息传播,需要强节点,也就是当一个信息在传播时候,开始是顶点,然后迅速消失,这点跟你的感觉一致

累死了也没保存下来,换了iris,plebstr也不行。老了,心尚年轻

你把那个被封的小动画发上来我再说,嘿嘿

Replying to Avatar gsovereignty

A lot of people in the Bitcoin space are underestimating China and the Chinese government.

China is long Bitcoin. They have more Bitcoin than the US government. They also have far more power generation capacity, and asic production capacity. Over a 4 year timescale they are able to direct multiple orders of magnitude more energy at sha256 than the rest of the world combined.

In the United States, the Cantillion Pyramid is privately owned, by people who have no allegance to the USA. In China, it's under domestic control, by people who truley believe in their own civilization and want it to exist in another 5000 years.

Remember the China mining FUD? That ended when China "banned" mining. They understand that hashpower needs to be spread out.

Remember the 329 times that China has banned Bitcoin? Those are actually bans on weak hands, and shitcoins, not Bitcoin itself. Chinese aren't stupid, they are just as intelligent as anyone else. Chinese who actually understand Bitcoin don't use domestic exchanges and have never been affected by any of the bans. This is intentional.

Hong Kong lawmakers were going to follow the US KYC/AML stuff and ban retail from buying Bitcoin. Guess what, everyone pushing that idea fell silent in relative unison. Someone higher up is calling the shots and wants to use HK as some kind of proving ground.

I have heard from a trusted source in the CSDN that the eCNY wallet has commented out lines of code that call LNURL endpoints and some API that serves bitcoin block headers, transaction depths, and address balances.

According to them, the plan is that Bitcoin will be used for foreign trade alongisde USD. Domestically, the CCP is not going to let go of currency controls. But manufacturers etc will be able to convert between RMB and Bitcoin.

Foreign companies will be able to pay manufacturers with Bitcoin through the eCNY wallet. The PBOC will automatically buy this Bitcoin and issue the manufacturer with freshly printed RMB. This is also how it worked with USD in the past - the CCP is taking a leaf from Deng Xiaoping's playbook.

The eCNY wallet itself will be banned in Western nations. But it doesn't matter, because you can hook into this system with any Lightning or normal Bitcoin wallet. This system is how China gets access to hostile markets. They are taking advantage of the fact that Bitcoin is black market money, a sewer rat that cannot die.

So what is China going to do with all this Bitcoin? I wonder if Russia accepting Bitcoin for oil and gas has anything to do with it.

China gov hold lots ofbtc?Idont believe they can

一杯热水,一杯冰水,把肿胀部位轮流放进去,效果到时候上来汇报下。

没疯,是你疯了