Can't the coordinator just make sure users of the updated protocol coordinate with like users

Considering coinjoins already stick out on chain, maybe a similar spec could work that works inside coinjoins without silent payment's strict requirement of needing to look like every other taproot tx. Address reuse inside coinjoins is bad

cc #[6]

#[2] are you guys working on this feature?

Not only is he a self confident charlatan, he's also a flaming douche. When he spews bullshit, the plebs eat it up and rejoice in admiration. Illogical idiocy packaged in just the right amount of toxicity. Plebs can't get enough, they love it. This is his what 3rd book now rehashing the same bullshit

Question: in what way do you find it easier to fact check here versus twitter?

The toxic plebs ❤ grifters

Max Kaiser, Jason Lowery, #[0]

The list goes on. The toxic plebs have created a breeding ground for grift of their particular flavor

Learning about principles of economics from someone who thought the stock to flow model was logical makes perfect sense, if you're a moron

I'm a cartoon character and won a bet with another cartoon character on here for 0.5 Monero. He didn't pay me for a while so I called him a scammer then he paid me and called me a pussy. It's pretty magical here, I'm a fan.

> calls me a retarded ignorant dumbass for saying notification txs to paynyms are clearly visible on chain

> tries to bet 0.1 BTC that they are not visible

> agrees to bet a measly 0.5 XMR instead

> loses the bet, because notification txs to paynyms are visible on chain

> doesn't pay for over a month after saying he will pay by end of week

It seems scammer isn't the right word for you anymore. I wonder what the right word is.

Circular local economies -> create our own society

I'm curious to hear nothingmuch's thoughts too

Is this the case in Stack? That is solid

Assume you're a stack duo user. You want to pay a paynym. You send the notification transaction to the paynym. You then use the change UTXO from the notification transaction to make the payment to the paynym. A presumably common flow if you intend to pay a paynym. The world sees the notification transaction and then sees the change UTXO spent in a subsequent tx.

Assume 2 other people do this same thing.

Now assume the recipient is another stack duo user who has posted their paynym somewhere. The recipient then consolidates those 3 payments in a subsequent tx.

This is strong evidence that anyone can use to form a lower bound on the amount the paynym received. Without a strong holistic privacy toolkit, leakages like this are bound to happen.

Releasing paynyms without whirlpool support is a bit irresponsible. That will harm both sender and receiver privacy and can very easily undo all benefits of paynyms in the first place.

Ah the hyper arrogant charlatan has arrived thank g for self confident idiots

That I don't know but I can guess. Wasabi death by a thousand paper cuts from poorly constructed coinjoins. Samourai death by coinjoining only with people who don't run their own dojo

He means Wasabi will slowly kill you but Samourai is insta death

How do Monero's "view keys" work?

First of all, the goal is censorship resistant electronic cash that can't be debased.

Second of all, organizations can still share their Monero transaction history and provide cryptographic guarantees over that data without revealing their spend key.

Please act like you can eat the cookie even though you really can't