When I don't want to be involved in the blunders of the people, my desire to rule grows. The arrogance that my personal decision is superior to that of the people.
Even though I pretend to be smart, I can’t hide my stupidity from myself. Everyone is like this, right? If not, it’s a complete idiot.
I got off topic.
If there is trust between people, there is neither leadership nor following. After cooling down my mind, I see the weakening of democracy as the weakening of trust between people.
Trust is neither worship nor blind belief, it comes with responsibility. If the consequences of someone's actions are accompanied by resentment or praise, there is no trust. Is it trust to celebrate someone's decision to jump off a cliff? Trust is not about throwing out the end.
Ah, When I try to grasp what trust is, it scatters! It's important.
However, I feel that trust is difficult for me. I still can't overcome my fear of being betrayed.
They must be doing the best in the world, so I will too. I want to think like that. I think that's where democracy begins.
When I don't want to be involved in the blunders of the people, my desire to rule grows. The arrogance that my personal decision is superior to that of the people.
Even though I pretend to be smart, I can’t hide my stupidity from myself. Everyone is like this, right? If not, it’s a complete idiot.
I got off topic.
If there is trust between people, there is neither leadership nor following. After cooling down my mind, I see the weakening of democracy as the weakening of trust between people.
Trust is neither worship nor blind belief, it comes with responsibility. If the consequences of someone's actions are accompanied by resentment or praise, there is no trust. Is it trust to celebrate someone's decision to jump off a cliff? Trust is not about throwing out the end.
Ah, When I try to grasp what trust is, it scatters! It's important.
However, I feel that trust is difficult for me. I still can't overcome my fear of being betrayed.
They must be doing the best in the world, so I will too. I want to think like that. I think that's where democracy begins.
If every red blood cell was intelligent, would life support work better than if it wasn't?
Red blood cells may wonder why they work and what they work for.
Life support is neglected while they agonize, and it will be stopped depending on their answer. So don't demand intelligence from red blood cells.
Authority and people come to mind.
Democracy was not like this when it was founded.
People have disappointed it many times.
For example, suppose there is a survey result that says, “Approximately 60% of whites view other races as inferior.” How do people perceive whites based on this data? 60% of people may view whites as dangerous.
In this way, I think that the repetition of crudely associating an attribute with a quality has led to violation of personality.
This phenomenon may be easier to observe for gender than for race.
Humans are intelligent creatures, but them dislike things complicated. Still, when there is a need to face complexity, humans are satisfied with quantification and stop thinking.
Humans flee to numbers due to the difficulty of the route to the true meaning of words. Numbers seem more obvious than other letters, but they have context.
Human thinking has looseness that unconsciously assumes that Π is 3. The system continues to distort with ignored numbers.
It's hard to represent perfect integers. There are deviations that cannot be measured by eyes or equipment. Similarly, humans can't just follow the mold of stereotypes. Even if they desperately imitate.
Needless to say, I am one of the humans.
When I was a child, an adult said, when humans die, they become stars in the night sky. No way. If I could be a star, I want to be now. The body will eventually decay, and at that time the soul will also be taken away. If I could be the soul of a star, I'd be able to keep thinking quietly without chores until I get bored. Ah, the Sun may look noisy because it's shining, but to me, it looks like it's standing quietly at a distance from its surroundings.
I wouldn't be lonely if I didn't have the heart, but I wonder if I can think without my burning heart.
Hey, is there a soul in order to move the body, or is there a body in order for the soul to feel?
While thinking about such a this, I also think that the starry sky may actually be wallpaper, and the universe may be the name of the box. If the wall is absurdly far away, can I recognize it as a wall?
If you don't want to fund the "creator's" living expenses, mind the seller's advertising costs.
Such a troublesome time has come?
Will companies afraid of loss shy away from the platform?
Will some users leave from the platform if the quality of the ads is low?
Whatever the case, the platform will no longer sound tones of revolution.
Due to its name change, the achievement is no longer trampled.
The presence of the Sun is strong, but no one sees the true form of the Sun.
No.
The Sun is unable to be seen by anyone.
It’s too brilliant for the eyes of conscious beings.
However, the Sun doesn't know loneliness because it has no heart.
I think I share the value of choosing solitude with people who belong to philosophy. But that doesn't make loneliness less painful.
If the sun is too hot for living things, the sun can't do anything about it. Because of the sun is the sun.
The sun has no heart. So it may be looked cold.
North wind, cool me down.
If the north wind and the sun fought in the scorching desert, the outcome might be different from the story.
Well, human history is also like that.
If scientists find out the heat of the air that seems to melt everything is
due to my burning heart, would the world kill me?
Anger at power is irritation at its incompetence. Anger at democracy is hatred at the people who choose incompetent leaders. But if I really hate people, I'd enjoy democracy making blunders. This anger is like the annoyance when a child doesn't listen to me and tries to touch a hot pot.
If there is a good leader, I will gladly follow it. Is there such a person? Even God, the perfect being imagined by human beings, is flawed.
God can only be performed on a stage with only actors, cannot exist in diversity.
People who want attention are not attractive. Even they are vaguely aware of it. They interact with each other to be seen in return.
Interaction between humans is often a lonely act of trying to fill the void of their minds with attention from others.
Platforms overflowing with old babies.
Constantly searching for attention that didn't get enough as child.
Will society move forward with these fragile minds, or will it seek healing?
Healing? Can this be healed
Platforms heal or widen the wound?
When stable people leave the platform, what's left behind?
Does dialogue made by machines of knowledge heal people?
Humans who live by depriving the cultivators of their bread, trample the cultivators for their lack of bread. The cultivators gave up on living, the selfish humans trampled the cultivators even further, and their momentum finally destroyed even ground. Everything is going to fall down.
Human attempt to maintain ‘their world’ destroys their world.
Who the fuck would need weapons to destroy human world.
Humans kill themselves. Humans repeat small-scale self-destruction even in social life. It's like a microcosm.
Should I be sad?
I don't see a religious heaven, but I do see a definite heaven after human death.
before the planet evaporates with the Sun
People tend to prefer sentences that are simple and don't require them to think.
Lowering brain to be understood by people seems silly, but Einstein said it was necessary.
Actions that increase the intelligence of the public.
Of all the talents humans can have, I admire them the most too.
Followers are not friends of influencers. They use influencers as a cover to attack people they hate, or as an umbrella to keep them out of attack. When the crowd is denounced, they push influencers into the public eye, sneak out
and the idiots find new idols.
This kind of idiot makes democracy its worst form.
One of my favourite posts about the cartoon dog with glasses is the one where he gave an example of superpower: "The smell of farts reaches far away"
in society where most people define power as something beneficial only to themselves to conquer others,
the flexibility of thought to point out an evil of a random superpower
for example
if
my liking start with "this person might break down the wall of the system" and end selfishly with "the person seems to have approached the wall to stroke it".
i would not be a desirable person in a relationship