Avatar
Eric FJ 🪬⚡️
7999814161743f2279006ab10cfd83bd33adff23c85e5d9d0949fdd60f8f1901
De-commerce evangelist. Let’s build the Bitcoin circular economy together. Running nostr:npub1nkfqwlz7xkhhdaa3ekz88qqqk7a0ks7jpv9zdsv0u206swxjw9rq0g2svu Check out our alpha release: https://alpha.conduit.market/ ⚡️🪬💜 Nostr only 💜🪬⚡️

I guess as a follow up to this, if the state wanted to stifle your project by sponsoring a competitor, and/or even co-opt your project… twisting it for their purposes, aren’t you making it easier for that to happen with a license that allows follow up work to be closed source?

I totally get where you’re coming from. I struggle with this because I see the conflict as open source vs. closed source instead of state vs. xyz. I’d like to use the state to our advantage where possible- but tell me what I’m not seeing…

Thx

So do you feel the GPL chain restricts your offering too much? No worries about MIT being taken and used for closed source projects?

Nostr is the only one starting as an open protocol (that I know of).

Bluesky seems very closed, and even their proposed federation model is far from open. This is still governance, dressed up differently.

These villages you speak of can (and I would argue eventually will) all happen here, with different flavors, settings, filters, whatever… an open protocol lets this happen organically. Closed protocols by definition have an upper limit on growth. Sure they could somehow be part of this movement at the outset, but they’ll die out to an open protocol like Nostr eventually once it takes off

What free open source licenses are folks here using for their projects? Benefits/drawbacks? Curious on the takes of the community here.

#asknostr

Got sent this from a friend who used to work at Polymarket:

https://rekt.news/hedging-bets/

“When prediction markets become kingmakers, who's really calling the shots, the crowd, the coders, or the ones holding the biggest bags?”

More proof that “crypto” isn’t decentralized- only various attempts at governance on different rails failing over and over again as they run face first into greed, corrupt incentives and black swans. Have any of them ever been designed for resilience against our worst tendencies? Nope. Only #bitcoin / #lightning / #ecash and #nostr is needed folks.

This mic drop is extra saucy with her voice and accent

nostr:note1vy9s57pv46fadmfe7l9lfcgdxq9xd9yla8rkr06f7sjv92tt4q9qpsu99f

Spitznagel’s warning from November 2023: you should start worrying when the fed cuts rates.

Replying to Avatar Leo Fernevak

Thoughts on the breakdancing spectacle at the 2024 Olympics.

By critiquing "ableness", a performer does no longer have to compete via skill.

At that point it becomes a competition about being politically aligned (correct) toward the establishment.

In other words: woke.

Rejecting the idea of objectively measurable performance and skill has been a theme in postmodernism for a century.

If our ideology involves rejecting "ableness" or the idea of agreed-upon achievement rankings, then skill becomes irrelevant and ideological correctness becomes the only "game" hierarchy.

At that point we are asked to compete in ideological purity, not achievement.

This being said, I am not against abstract art and competitions that involve some amount of subjective evaluations. Even abstract art is impacted by aesthetic considerations.

Within every art genre we compare the quality of competing contributions. We rank competing submissions based on creativity, skill, vision, beauty and artistic achievement. We want the most impressive contributions within a genre to rank over the less impressive contributions. In short: meritocracy. Or at least some approximation of it.

Meritocracy is delibarately deconstructed under the banner of postmodernism. While we can debate which of two abstract paintings is more impressive, and while our criteria for a ranking an achievement can differ from person to person, we can only create *meaningful* genres of competition where we agree on the overall ranking criteria.

Every sport and competition requires vocalized and agreed-upon ranking criteria. If those ranking criteria involve ideological purity and not some acknowledged and demonstrable achievement then we have just made political correctness into a sport that trumps all other forms of achievement.

Let there be as many genres of competition as we can imagine, but let's not determine someone's achievement by their alignment to some ideological system. Peers compete against peers.

#Meritocracy #Postmodernism #Sport #Art #Achievement #Competition #Woke

I mean she got all zero scores and Australia got embarrassed on the world stage. I think this was a huge net loss for woke ideology

Or better yet troll people on other platforms with only a preview of your post then a link here

#nostronly

nostr:note1wmegmqqglkmqshpq0kfr0gu8cp4z77rrzhu8tdl5gh9wg7lcgljq8apgc4

10/10

nostr:note1ntjxkhylj6hjc2amx3yynm45dysua0cmxr9s85x9r7yt8pwmdygqgfklds