Very cool. nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6 was one of the few activitypub devs I interacted with on the fediverse who actually seemed to care about censorship resistance. I eventually gave up trying to build an activitypub node and started hacking on nostr. nostr is sucking up all the builders of the decentralized social web 👀🛠️ nostr:note1r2r84trdlzh39gv72qprsq53w73my4zke3gh72awc207tvptvtls6rlkqn
And it turns out, you were right about Nostr!
Soapbox has been awarded a grant by OpenSats! I've stepped down as Head of Engineering at Truth Social to pursue this mission full time. https://soapbox.pub/blog/soapbox-awarded-grant/
What you like is not the same as what 99% of normal people in America like.
nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6 bridging nostr communities with lemmy/kbin would be pretty awesome 👀
Should be doable.
Looks cool: https://chakra-ui.com/
Do you mean nip05?
For the prompt "edible diamond", you can't tell me this isn't creative. I'm not sure whether the task of being creative just isn't as special or hard as we thought, or if the AI is just advanced enough to be creative. But the outcome from AI is at least equal to what a creative human can do, and far more consistent.
The only way your point of view makes sense is if you believe humans have a soul.
And what do you think our brain does when we create something new?
In my experience none of these AI services infringe on copyright. They does not produce derivative works, they produce original works inspired by the vast library of training data.
They DO potentially infringe trademarks (depending on how you use the resulting images, of course). Like, you can get an AI to draw you a picture of Mario. But it would not be based on any previously existing Mario picture, it would be an all new image of Mario. This is similar to fan art.
That's the same for a human being creating "original works".
Note that this isn't necessarily the case for all AI products. I specifically reviewed the Terms of Service for those 3.
ChatGPT, Dall-E 2, Midjourney - all proprietary software, BUT all copyright for anything it produces is assigned to you. This is a superpower, and probably the best opportunity Free Culture has ever had. Generate a bunch of useful graphics and CC license it, or public domain. There is a huge freedom prospect even though the code is proprietary.
Unpopular opinion, but I have very little sympathy for artists being replaced by AI. If you're already a starving artist, you lost nothing, and you only gained opportunities. If you're such a great and creative artist, then come up with the best prompts and do 10x more! This sounds like whiny people who don't want to put in effort to learn a new technology. The world is changing around us all the time. Adapt!
nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6 How does mostr handle edits towards the nostr side? I assume it simply ignores them? (Forgive me if this is documented somewhere.)
It ignores them. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/646
If your server is not on at least one fedi blocklist, it's basically not even real.
A Mastodon server called "Vegan Unity" joined the Fediverse and then immediately blocked me. 🤣 I'm vegan btw. #vegan 🍆
nostr:note1ewvc0wsq0kuyzgpa5mglrv6ak60kddkr4p4y5gzvjqtaat6k56wqwn6qyg