Torrent protocol is battle tested. And who said it had to be web ready ? Why should this be a constraint ?

There would be an obvious question of the data persistence - e.g : how long should I seed - but nothing that seems to be a huge impediment to me

Having some example of a kind of workflow like : I chose a file to share in my client. The client creates a magnet link to be shared through nip-94, seeds the file, and users that want to access the file retrieve it thanks to the magnet url and an embedded torrent client.

Am I missing something obvious here ?

Regarding 1. Why another protocol ? P2P file sharing exist since a long time and are battle tested.

Many nips are not supported in many clients. I don't see this as an argument.

As per the people not wanting nip-94 why not let the clients provide choice to the user to filter out those events ? Nip-94 per se doesn't cost much as it is only file headers which is quite light

I can understand the take regarding nip-95 ( even if I don't have a particular opinion ), but I don't get it about banning nip-94

Isn't nip-94 only about file headers ?

There should be a NIP to ban anyone from the network that support Hawaiian pizza

You know you can ask for note deletion right? 😅

Yeah, I was like "wtf is the relation between Prometheus and nfts ??!"

Non non, on est bien là ! #nostrfr

Unfortunately nope. Best thing (s)he can do afaik is to warn people about it and start fresh

C'est pas moi 🙈

Raclette, definitely obvious raclette on the way

Fuckin' hell. So this what we call multiverse ?

I see Bortzmeyer, I upvote 💜

J'ai déjà du mal a trouver mes yeux, alors des oeufs... :P

Bonjour bonjour ! Et bon appétit bien sûr !

Salut les #nostronautes !

J'espère que vous êtes en forme ! #nostrfr

Ici ça se réveille au son de cloche sans ménagement :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GL56LY6fE0E

How would you qualify it then ?