Avatar
Gary ₿usey
7b2d73a3ac9714b06500005454b1b24ff255304eb488076822122101d0fcf7a2
I'm obsessed with South Park, love working with numbers and am doing my best to learn all I can about the BTC ecosystem. Just a little crazy... 😬👽 Death to fiat! ⚡️ "A new idea must not be judged by its immediate results" Nikola Tesla "Life on earth is more like a verb. It repairs, maintains, re-creates, and outdoes itself" Lynn Margulis
Replying to Avatar Ryan

How's that old gal, Mosha?

Couldn't agree more. Total design flaw, like you said. Moderation is just such a nuisance. 😮‍💨

You would think, given it's name, that the concept of free speech would come off as self-explanatory to most.

I can't really argue against that. Bitcoin's limited supply and the halving occurrences pretty much cement the validity of this approach.

Any time you purchase any asset you're trading your time.

China's a great example of how even the most authoritarian governments can't stop Bitcoin, though. They tried for years pre-covid and nothing happened. The miners fled to the U.S. But, governments and corps still don't own the majority. Also, I forget which countries, I think it was South Africa that figured out how to perform Bitcoin transactions without internet connection.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2023/03/15/how-africans-are-using-bitcoin-without-internet-access/

I don't think so. I don't think this halving will be anything like the previous ones. More capital has been invested into bitcoin in the past 3 years alone than all of the other previous halvings combined.

Why the fuck would you pull out?!

There is one argument that can be made against that, though: governments and corporations operate on a "if we can't have the majority of it, then no one can have it" type of philosophy. That being said there could be the very real possibility of them never wishing to adopt bitcoin. This is just my opinion, of course. 🤷‍♂️

Replying to Avatar Bitkini

A valid concern.