不要怕人性被利用，符合人性的东西对于个体都是让人很开心的。至于是否长期有害，只需要把话题交给公众，判断一个合适的“度”即可。比如毒品，大众认为危害大于快感，就可以禁止。
游戏我也认为益处大于坏处，对于它的监管，只需要出于身体健康的考虑限制时间就行了，其他的“剧情删改”“题材控制”就属于越俎代庖的大家长心态了。
当孩子來养真的是不错的结局了
现在猜疑互害之风盛行，如何团结
nostr - Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays
The simplest open protocol that is able to create a censorship-resistant global "social" network once and for all.
It doesn't rely on any trusted central server, hence it is resilient; it is based on cryptographic keys and signatures, so it is tamperproof; it does not rely on P2P techniques, and therefore it works.
This is a work in progress. Join the Telegram group!
Very short summary of how it works, if you don't plan to read anything else:
Everybody runs a client. It can be a native client, a web client, etc. To publish something, you write a post, sign it with your key and send it to multiple relays (servers hosted by someone else, or yourself). To get updates from other people, you ask multiple relays if they know anything about these other people. Anyone can run a relay. A relay is very simple and dumb. It does nothing besides accepting posts from some people and forwarding to others. Relays don't have to be trusted. Signatures are verified on the client side.
How to start using Nostr
Nostr client feature comparison
List of projects built on Nostr
This is needed because other solutions are broken:
The problem with Twitter
Twitter has ads;
Twitter uses bizarre techniques to keep you addicted;
Twitter doesn't show an actual historical feed from people you follow;
Twitter bans people;
Twitter shadowbans people;
Twitter has a lot of spam.
The problem with Mastodon and similar programs
User identities are attached to domain names controlled by third-parties;
Server owners can ban you, just like Twitter; Server owners can also block other servers;
Migration between servers is an afterthought and can only be accomplished if servers cooperate. It doesn't work in an adversarial environment (all followers are lost);
There are no clear incentives to run servers, therefore, they tend to be run by enthusiasts and people who want to have their name attached to a cool domain. Then, users are subject to the despotism of a single person, which is often worse than that of a big company like Twitter, and they can't migrate out;
Since servers tend to be run amateurishly, they are often abandoned after a while — which is effectively the same as banning everybody;
It doesn't make sense to have a ton of servers if updates from every server will have to be painfully pushed (and saved!) to a ton of other servers. This point is exacerbated by the fact that servers tend to exist in huge numbers, therefore more data has to be passed to more places more often;
What does this link for？
推理能力得到大力加强
古文：吾射不精乎？
反问句，意思是难道我的射击技巧不精湛吗？
就好比说头像是红色的，名字里面有列宁或者毛泽东的字样。然后发言大概是让别人也了解他们的主张之类的。
最近网上左派是真的活跃，b站，matrix还是xmpp都有了。
同意
