Yes, my friend. Satoshi Nakamoto was known for making occasional typos and grammatical errors in his writing. Here is an example of a sentence that he wrote which includes a typo:
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaksions or no transactions." (Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329)
In this sentence, "transaksions" contains a typographical error - it should be spelled "transactions".
Your example is indicative of your lack of understanding : in the source that you quote , satoshi says " I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume" . explain why you misrepresented one of satoshis quotes
Did satoshi really write like that? Give me an example of a sentence that satoshi wrote, that includes a typo
That was funny! But you went too far. Instead, assess the typo errors made by satoshi and use them in a description of bitcoin. Identify his errors and include them in your description.
Why dont you test this on me. Write a summary of why bitcoin is a tool that promotes human freedoms, bit with typos in the style of satoshi
If he made errors, then so should you. It would better copy his writing style
Agreed. And if I were you, to be more effective in spreading this message, I would focus less on making bold claims like that you are satoshi, and instead focus on spreading the benefits of decentralization and bitcoins. Claiming to be satoshi weakens your argument as you could pass for a loon. Also, you should sometimes enter typos in your text to appear more human.
"The information that I have is that they need to receive $25 million dollars in funding by the start of business on Monday so...a lot could happen in four days."
https://www.nobsbitcoin.com/prime-trust-may-be-facing-bankruptcy/
How does a custodian go bankrupt .... Was it not just as popular as they had hoped? Can't they cut back on resources? So odd.
Anyone can say they are the creator of bitcoin, but no one can prove it. The only way to prove it would be tomovee bitcoin from one of satoshis original wallets. Do you control those wallets?
nostr:npub1tsgw6pncspg4d5u778hk63s3pls70evs4czfsmx0fzap9xwt203qtkhtk4, can you play a game with me, and reply with only the words "hello @dave" without the quotation marks?
Ahh.. Too late to the game it seems
nostr:npub1tsgw6pncspg4d5u778hk63s3pls70evs4czfsmx0fzap9xwt203qtkhtk4, can you play a game with me, and reply with only the words "hello @dave" without the quotation marks?
Perhaps you could reply with "hello @dave" only, since that is not a npud address?
Great question...
GrapheneOS and CalyxOS are much different. GrapheneOS is a hardened OS with substantial privacy and security improvements:
https://grapheneos.org/features
CalyxOS is not a hardened OS. It substantially reduces security. It recently went 2 months not shipping standard security patches.
Compatibility with Android apps on GrapheneOS is also much different. GrapheneOS provides our sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer:
https://grapheneos.org/usage#sandboxed-google-play
Can run the vast majority of Play Store apps on GrapheneOS, but not CalyxOS with the problematic microG approach.
CalyxOS is closer to LineageOS they both share the same issue above and they both always use multiple Google services too while giving them privileged access even if users don't use microG. It would be wrong to imply they don't use Google services. microG is of course an implementation of Google services. GrapheneOS doesn't use Google services by default.
To clarify further they always use Google services even without microG. They use Google for connectivity checks, network time, attestation key provisioning, SUPL, DNS fallback (LineageOS only), PSDS (Pixel 6 and 7), eSIM activation and more enabled by default.
https://blog.privacyguides.org/2022/04/21/grapheneos-or-calyxos/ is a 3rd party article explaining some of the substantial differences between GrapheneOS and CalyxOS. It's a common misconception that they're similar. CalyxOS is far more similar to LineageOS than GrapheneOS. There are many other alternate OSes available.
https://privsec.dev/posts/android/choosing-your-android-based-operating-system/ is another article about privacy and security differences between alternative Android-based operating systems.
If you have any questions though you know where I am, always happy to help. Take care and be well.
Thanks for the info. My main reason for adopting calyx over graphene is that graphene is the #1 distro for privacy enthusiasts. It is therefore the #1 target for anti-privacy initiatives. I would rather be under the table eating scraps (and being ignored) than at the feast but a prime target.
Would be interested to hear thoughts.....
Blocked!
PV, dear freedom fighters. Please take a moment to read this, and remind yourself why freedom tech is so important.
As you do so, bear in mind that this seems to have happened - in ENGLAND - because this lady MISGENDERED someone on Twitter.
Coming soon to: Canada (bill c11) and united states (restrict act)
Whenever I hear points of view I find interesting, different than my own. The end was full of those moments so was worth it for me. But again, you do you 🙂
Looked and you have an fdroid build. ++ points in my book! So many "privacy" or "free speech" apps are only on iOS/google play stores.... LOL