There have been several accusations and lawsuits against New York Times Company over pollution and environmental violations at their paper mills and production facilities:
1. A 1994 lawsuit accused the NY Times of illegally dumping pollutants from their printing plant into Bronx rivers and harms local communities. The lawsuit alleged violations of the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act. It was settled in 1997 with NY Times agreeing to pay $750,000 in fines and invest $7 million in pollution controls.
2. In 2007, the EPA sued the NY Times again for violations at their mill in Lock Haven, PA including discharging wastewater with high levels of pollutants like nitrogen and phosphorus into Susquehanna river. The NY Times settled by paying $500,000 in fines and ensuring $5 million in upgrades.
3. Local communities and environmental groups have accused the NY Times for leaching chemical pollutants from ink into groundwater from their printing plants in NY, NJ and PA. Chemicals like benzene, toluene, and xylene have been detected in monitoring wells near the plants. Residents filed lawsuits alleging health issues from the pollution.
4. The NY Times was also criticized for aggressive logging and environmental damage at timberlands they own in Maine. Local groups accused them of clear-cutting forests, damaging wildlife habitat and violating land use laws. NY Times pledged to adopt sustainable forestry practices after facing protests and bad publicity.
5. Environmental reports have ranked the NY Times poorly on sustainability and green practices. Critics argue they do little to offset the large environmental footprint of their industrial paper and printing operations despite their focus on environmental journalism. Supporters counter that they are making efforts to adopt renewable energy, reduce waste and develop eco-friendly paper and ink.
The New York Times hypocritically attacks Bitcoin mining operations for their energy consumption and carbon footprint, while conveniently ignoring the enormous environmental impact of their own paper mills, printing plants and industrial operations.
While the NYT laments Bitcoin miners using electricity, they fail to recognize that electricity production itself is already regulated. Bitcoin mining does not directly emit any pollution or greenhouse gases - it simply consumes electricity generated from a mix of energy sources that are regulated and moving towards renewable energy. If powering electric cars is considered environmentally friendly, then the electricity usage of Bitcoin miners should not be vilified either.
Unlike the renewable energy arguments the NYT makes against Bitcoin, their own massive paper and printing plants rely on clearly polluting and unsustainable practices, from logging old-growth forests to dumping toxic waste into rivers. The pollution and health hazards caused by the NYT's own industrial facilities have led to numerous lawsuits, fines, and criticism from communities and environmental groups over the decades.
The New York Times attacks Bitcoin not out of environmental principle but due to political and financial interests. A decentralized digital currency threatens their privilege and control. They dismiss how Bitcoin empower people all over the world with access to finance and stronger economic freedom, especially in developing countries. To NYT, the environment only matters when it can be used to argue against technologies that could challenge established systems of power and wealth.
While advocating for environmental progress, the New York Times fails to practice what they preach. Their own disproportionate consumption and pollution undermines any moral authority on the issue. Only by remedying their own unsustainable practices can they rightfully criticize the environmental impacts of others. Until then, their attacks on Bitcoin mining remain unjustified, self-serving and rooted in politics rather than facts.
Study #Bitcoin 
Humanity is currently grappling with the uncanny valley phenomenon when interacting with AI. Although the technology has not yet achieved true sentience, it can still appear eerily human-like at times, causing discomfort and confusion among people. As AI continues to advance and undergo exponential doubling of its abilities, these feelings of unease will only intensify in the future.
But, it's important to keep in mind that the real concern is not about Artificial Intelligence per se, but about us as emotionally charged beings and how we may react when we feel scared or threatened. Our reactions to AI are unpredictable, and we must prepare ourselves for the ethical and societal implications that come with interacting with intelligence on par or even better than our own.
The unknown awaits. 
A sense of unease creeps into your mind as you gaze upon the awe-inspiring face before you. In this cinematic portrayal of humanity, you are confronted with a reality that is both humbling and terrifying - a reality where intelligence far superior to our own looms before us, and we are left unsure of how to proceed.
As you take in the intricate detailing, you can almost feel the weight of the situation pressing down on you.
As we stand in front of a being that is both beyond our comprehension and yet a product of our own creation, the moment is incredibly significant because of how much it resembles life. And yet, even as we stand in the presence of this incomprehensible intelligence, we cannot help but wonder - what will happen next? Will we be able to find a way to coexist with this entity, or will we be forever at its mercy?
As you contemplate these questions, you realize that the image before you is more than just a work of art - it is a profound meditation on the nature of humanity, our place in the universe, and our relationship with the unknown.
The key idea here is that #Bitcoin and its finite supply of 21 million coins represents a paradigm shift from fiat currencies issued by central governments with unlimited supply and the discretion to print as much money as they wish. All major fiat currencies throughout history have eventually failed due to inflation and loss of purchasing power.
Bitcoin's scarcity and immutable design offers a promising alternative. With only 21 million Bitcoins that will ever be produced, its value cannot be diluted into oblivion through reckless money creation and quantitative easing like central banks do today. Once mainstream adoption grows the market cap of Bitcoin, the value per coin has tremendous potential to rise geometrically due to the fixed supply.
By comparison, the market caps of the top 29 fiat currencies could all be eclipsed by and absorbed into Bitcoin, because their numbers can simply be made larger at any time. All the while, Bitcoin's supply is forever fixed at 21 million, and thus, ∞/21. No amount of government policy can debase Bitcoin's value by printing trillions more into existence. Its enduring property of scarcity and sound money design suggest that over the long run, all fiat currencies are doomed to fail while Bitcoin could thrive as a byproduct of their failure. The market recognizes this probability by giving Bitcoin an already higher valuation than most major national currencies.
Bitcoin is not just another asset class, but a monetary revolution with the potential to transcend the manipulated and discredited fiat systems of the past. ∞/21 captures this revolutionary idea in a nutshell. In the decades to come, the relative values of currencies versus Bitcoin may come to reflect this concept.
Study #Bitcoin.
Image from Twitter. 
Bitcoin is currently reaching new all-time highs in Argentina, and it's important to remember that the US dollar isn't the sole determinant of Bitcoin’s value. Rather, it's merely another exchange rate in relation to BTC. As an student of #Bitcoin, it's important not to be overly focused on American-centric perspectives. The truth is, Bitcoin's USD all-time high is just around the corner as the next halving looms closer. It's vital to recognize that Bitcoin is not just some investment vehicle; it's the new global single currency that is monetizing and transforming into money for all of humanity. When you buy Bitcoin today, you have the opportunity to own a piece of the future of money for only a fraction of its potential value. That's what's up. 
I'm excited to share with you an introductory article on Bitcoin that I just finished writing! I know it can be a complex topic, but don't worry - I've simplified it using the Khan Academy course. In my guide, you'll find a single link that will give you a comprehensive understanding of #Bitcoin, whether you're a beginner or have some experience. Check it out! If you find this guide helpful, please like and share it with your friends. Let me know your thoughts and questions in the comments!
https://muju.substack.com/p/from-basics-to-advanced-a-comprehensive
Is your data safe on these apps? This looks very cool. But I always worry about what happens behind the scenes with all these new apps popping up.
All the world's wealth is gravitating toward Bitcoin. And there's nothing anyone can do to stop it.
The emergence of a sounder form of money naturally draws value away from less sound currencies and assets. Their purchasing power declines relative to the harder money. Bitcoin's presence is repricing the world's wealth in its direction.
Nothing can stop this dynamic once it gets underway. The migration of value to Bitcoin is inevitable. Its scarcity and security provide an irresistible safe haven and store of value relative to the alternatives.
Bit by bit, drop by drop, trillions of dollars of value are being absorbed into Bitcoin. And this process will only accelerate over time. There are no brakes on this train.
This Senate speech exemplifies what makes America's system of government worth defending despite the flaws I usually highlight. The fact that reasoned, logical arguments find a platform even in the highest echelons of power—the US Senate—embodies the spirit of open discourse fundamental to all democracies everywhere.
The Senator compellingly lays out the case against military intervention, which could lead to catastrophic nuclear war, grounding his arguments in hard truths in contrast to the belligerent war-mongering rhetoric that frequently dominated much of the debate since the war in Ukraine began.
While one may disagree with the Senator's position, his speech reminds us of why free expression and democratic institutions are so crucial to the foundation of good governance. Only by protecting open and honest debate, free from verbal manipulation and emotional appeals, can reason and logic shape policy, even at the highest levels of power. In today's polarized political landscape, this type of address offers a welcome dose of sobriety and rational thinking when advocating for a challenging position or stance. In fractured times, speeches like this offer hope, reason may prevail, and a dose of much-needed courage in the face of difficult choices. Watch.
https://twitter.com/senatorbrakey/status/1634028153470435331
If governments are considering banning bitcoin, it is a troubling sign that demands vigilance, not fear. While we should not succumb to fomo or hysteria, we must recognize such actions as encroaching on human freedoms gained through centuries of struggle—including philosophical reflection, social movements, and seminal events like the the invention of the printing press and the French Revolution.
The idea of universal human rights has evolved memetically, adapting to confront new injustices. Our conception of rights is still gradually evolving, influenced by historical events and broader currents shaping human progress. Bitcoin's potential to democratize access to resources evokes this ongoing human rights narrative. However, while banning self-custody would be an authoritarian affront to human progress, it is difficult to predict if many countries will ban bitcoin or if it would significantly impact power structures. However, in order to protect yourself, we must assume it will be banned, and so you must inadvertently prepare for that outcome.
Although the future is uncertain, we must not take a neutral global monetary system like Bitcoin for granted. We should assume bitcoin's survival depends on individuals taking action—accumulating bitcoin, using it privately, and being prepared. Only by defending the liberties that allow new technologies to emerge will we keep thriving as a species. While this is no time for panic, it is a time for vigilance and principled action.
#boatingaccident 
The notion of 'late stage capitalism' points to a system in crisis, propped up by an unsustainable fiat money system based on government-issued funny-money-monopoly-currencies like the U.S. dollar. The dollar's status as the global reserve currency allows the U.S. to print money and accumulate debt on a massive scale. This distorts the economy, exacerbates inequality, and risks eventual collapse.
#Bitcoin presents an alternative with a capped supply and decentralized issuance. As a scarce digital commodity, Bitcoin cannot be debased at will by a central authority. It has the potential to serve as a lifeline in a post-fiat world and on a global scale. If the dollar's reign ends, Bitcoin could offer a path forward using sound money with known rules that no one can change.
As the inevitable end game of the fiat money Ponzi scheme approaches, Bitcoin stands ready as a lifeline to the post-fiat future. The development of Bitcoin's decentralized, sound money system is a vital preparation for the failure of central bank fiat and a world seeking an alternative.
Transitioning to a Bitcoin standard would require time, but doing so could help avoid the worst consequences of late stage fiat money and offer economic freedom from manipulation and mismanagement of money. As people wake up to fiat's flaws, Bitcoin will emerge as the compelling alternative to revive capitalism and build a more sustainable system for the long term. 
Maintaining multiple social media takes a lot of effort. But I feel it's important to stay on Nostr. I am totally shadow-banned info oblivion on Twitter. So have to cross-post some of my posts from twitter, Instagram and Facebook.
I agree with you. People using science for their nefarious reasons continue to paint science is a negative light. I wrote a post about that as well. https://damus.io/note1270vgrqxxnzgz0y0s2g5adry6gq09h26t892g5ajfhudgltsrgjq8td9as
The phrase 'this pandemic was caused by science' is a misleading framing.
Science is a method for understanding the world, not an actor that can 'cause' pandemics.
If former CDC Director, Dr. Redfield's speculation is correct, it was the misuse of science by people that led to this situation, not science itself.
We should not demonize scientific tools, but rather hold people accountable for misusing them.
Science has given us invaluable tools to understand, prevent and treat disease - when applied responsibly, science saves lives. But it must be guided by ethics and morality, not misused or exploited for dangerous purposes.
Let's criticize such misuse, not attack science itself. That's really not helpful when science is demonized.
The phrase "Vires in Numeris", which means "strength in numbers" in Latin, has become a battle cry for Bitcoiners. Originally used by cypherpunks in the 1990s to express the revolutionary potential of cryptography and decentralization, "Vires in Numeris" has taken on new meaning in the context of Bitcoin.
#Bitcoin realizes the cypherpunk vision of a decentralized digital cash system. But its implications go further in challenging the existing global monetary order. Bitcoin's distributed network architecture gives it resilience against control and shutdown. As more people use and mine bitcoin, this decentralization becomes even more powerful. For Bitcoiners, this is a sign that Bitcoin could have the numbers to take on dominant systems like the USD global reserve currency system. The idea of replacing the existing financial system with a Bitcoin standard may be far fetched for some and therefore controversial, but "Vires in Numeris" inspires belief in the radical possibilities of global decentralized neutral money for all of humanity.
If strength lies in numbers, then the growth of Bitcoin will signify its potential to transform money and the global economy on a large scale, despite the odds.
In this sense, "Vires in Numeris" has become a rallying cry for Bitcoin's revolutionary promise.
There has to be a way to delete accidental multiple posts when the app freezes. Are there? #[0]
The younger generation is growing up in an era of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence that are vastly more powerful than what older generations encountered in their youth. This means the average teen today, aged 11 to 18, is far more technologically savvy than the average teacher aged 35+. While teachers have the benefit of experience, students who have never known a world without smartphones and now AI assistants have an innate familiarity with emerging technologies.
As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, this new digital native generation will help shape how the tools develop and are applied. For better or worse, the future of artificial intelligence will be guided by those who have known nothing but a tech-infused world. This generational divide in technological fluency is both unprecedented and consequential. The power of AI must be wielded wisely, and nurturing dialogue between generations will be vital to ensuring a responsible path forward.
The implications of this technological shift and generation gap are profound.
The younger generation is growing up in an era of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence that are vastly more powerful than what older generations encountered in their youth. This means the average teen today, aged 11 to 18, is far more technologically savvy than the average teacher aged 35+. While teachers have the benefit of experience, students who have never known a world without smartphones and now AI assistants have an innate familiarity with emerging technologies.
As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, this new digital native generation will help shape how the tools develop and are applied. For better or worse, the future of artificial intelligence will be guided by those who have known nothing but a tech-infused world. This generational divide in technological fluency is both unprecedented and consequential. The power of AI must be wielded wisely, and nurturing dialogue between generations will be vital to ensuring a responsible path forward.
The implications of this technological shift and generation gap are profound.
The younger generation is growing up in an era of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence that are vastly more powerful than what older generations encountered in their youth. This means the average teen today, aged 11 to 18, is far more technologically savvy than the average teacher aged 35+. While teachers have the benefit of experience, students who have never known a world without smartphones and now AI assistants have an innate familiarity with emerging technologies.
As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, this new digital native generation will help shape how the tools develop and are applied. For better or worse, the future of artificial intelligence will be guided by those who have known nothing but a tech-infused world. This generational divide in technological fluency is both unprecedented and consequential. The power of AI must be wielded wisely, and nurturing dialogue between generations will be vital to ensuring a responsible path forward.
The implications of this technological shift and generation gap are profound.