Whether it is a real assassination attempt or a false flag, I come to the conclusion that at the minimum some elements within the SS chain of command are likely complicit (it doesn’t mean that all agents are). Although it is true, that if it’s a false flag, the body guards surrounding Trump after the shooting would have to be complicit as well. In the scenario of a false flag, a skilled shooter could have left enough room between Trump and his target but I agree that it remains a risky stunt. What makes the least sense in this scenario would be that the terrorist (probably MKUltra asset) would have had to be conditioned to not shoot Trump. I’m not a MKUltra specialist but I don’t recall any similar occurence.
If the deep state is really after Trump, I think it leaves a lot of loose ends in past psyop such as Qanon but obviously if it’s a real assassination attempt I would have to reconsider the narrative that Trump is also a deep state asset.
I don’t have a definitive opinion on what took place with the #TrumpAssassination attempt but it is very unlikely that this event was allowed to happen because of a negligence of the secret service.
What are the chance that the secret service would have failed to secure the building on which the the shooter was posted? Plus, how can we explain that the counter sniper let the terrorist fired first when he had him in visual minutes before the shooting started? These two facts most likely indicate an intent within the chain of command to let it happened.
Now the question that remains is whether or not the intent was to conduct the assassination of #Trump or to fake an assassination attempt on Trump.
While it seems egregious to entertain the latter, I don’t think we should definitely exclude it yet. Although, I haven’t seen any evidence supporting the « fake assassination » scenario, it wouldn’t be the most complicated #FalseFlag to execute especially when compared to other much larger false flag operations that took place.
The element that would really make me reconsider the possibility of this scenario is if it turned out that a bullet certainly pierced Trump’s ear. Until, we have more information on this element it’s not to be excluded that the terrorist shot at the crowd without actually directly aiming at Trump.
In the scenario where it was a real assassination attempt, the #DeepState totally failed its operation and made their enemy (Trump) stronger.
In the scenario where it was a fake assassination attempt, the execution by the deep state was flawless and Trump’s posture as the enemy of the deeps state is being reinforced (although he’s a deep state asset). There are also many other ways this operation would benefit the deep state. One of which would be to unite the American population behind a strong leader in preparation of a #WW3.
CFTC Chair says 70%-80% of #crypto are not securities (meaning they would be treated as commodities like #Bitcoin or #Ethereum). I would have expected a much lower percentage of crypto to be commodities under the definition introduced in #FIT21 (assuming the Chair used this definition for his assessment). I think the #altcoin summer is about to kick off.
https://watcher.guru/news/cftc-chair-says-70-80-of-cryptocurrencies-are-not-securities
Why to HODL #Bitcoin in self-custody?
- For the price appreciation
- To protect your wealth from governments’ confiscation
Why do you HODL #BTC ETF?
- For the price appreciation
If price goes down there is no reason to keep holding the ETF so I bet this Bitcoin cycle will see a massive flush (probably seeing a lower low than the previous cycle) to force BTC ETF hodlers to capitulate.
#ProofOfPersonhood protocols have properties that could enable borderless Democratic systems which is a design space still to be explored. However, we should be wary of services such as #Worldcoin which are neither open source nor decentralized. Worldcoin says their users can earn a UBI but Worldcoin has launched with a massive premine so it’s a bit of a joke. Also, its hardware is opaque and we don’t know how the biometrics are being handled. There are other alternatives to Worldcoin which are privacy preserving and don’t even require biometrics. One such service is #Idena (https://www.idena.io/). Today, #blockchain compete with governments/banks on the ownership of the money. Tomorrow, PoP blockchain will compete on the handling of identity with government. Our #DigitalID shouldn’t be the property of governments.
Short term, markets move towards traders liquidation. Long term, they move towards hodlers capitulation.
Agreed but when they sell their shares the manager has to sell spot BTC.
Many see the #Bitcoin ETF as being bullish for the price of #BTC because of the potential to increase capital inflow but an unknown is what type of holders will BTC ETF buyers be? It’s doubtful if they will have the same « HODLER » mentality than non-ETF buyers. When you buy the Bitcoin ETF, you only buy it for one and only reason which is to see a return on your investment, you don’t buy it to use it as a medium of exchange or self-custody your assets. Hence, if the price action doesn’t play out well there is not much reason to keep holding the ETF. Bitcoin ETF buyers probably have weaker hands. This may results in a shift of Bitcoin price action.
This #Bitcoin cycle is either going to be the greatest of all cycles or the worst of all.
#BTC
The risk of positioning #Bitcoin as a store of value only is that market downturns can trigger a loss of confidence in the belief that #BTC is actually a strong store of value. This happens at each cycle and Bitcoiners have learnt to factor the high volatility in the store of value narrative. However the core assumption that keeps this narrative alive is that the price of Bitcoin goes higher with each cycle and that every cycle correction put on a higher high. However what would happen if Bitcoin was to fail to make a higher high in a cycle uptrend or would put on a lower low in a cycle correction? Wouldn’t the « store of value » narrative be seriously undermined? In this case, what would be left for Bitcoin to sustain the demand and keep the hodlers from getting scared?
How would you react if it appears evident that Bitcoin fails to put on a higher high or put on a lower low in a cycle? Would you still consider Bitcoin as a store of value?
Then I think you missed the course of events. Unfortunately, I don’t really have the energy and time to go more in-depth on that so you’ll have to do more research. Also, a question I’ve never seen answered is: how can we explain the involvement of #Trump in the Qproofs without coming to the conclusions that Trump fooled people by participating in the #Qanon #Psyop?
#Qanon is an intelligence agency #psyop aimed at controlling and discrediting the #pizzagate narrative that emerged from the Podesta’s emails published by #Wikileaks. I don’t see how #McAfee would anything to do with this.
I guess I don’t really understand what you mean by « government services and products ». Governments usually don’t produce anything. Instead they set the rules within which the society is permitted to function. Are you suggesting that bills and regulations should be optional or am I misunderstanding the point?
I think some fundamental rights must be guaranteed regardless of what the majority wants and that’s usually the purpose of a Constitution, however when it comes to pass bills and policies it’s unclear to me what would be a better system than a majority system. The problem though is that bills aren’t currently passed by the majority. Electing representatives through majority voting isn’t the same as majority voting of bills. Representatives are too easily corrupted and/or mislead the voters regarding their intentions. Most of what is passed, the majority doesn’t actually want. We need more direct #democracy and/or random selection of representatives.
I don’t know what the “Democratic Elite” is panicking about. Don’t they want a technocratic society? In order to have it, you first need to destroy the current democratic structure. #Biden and #Trump serve this purpose perfectly. If that’s really the best options a democratic society results in then it certainly makes the case for a technocratic society runs by an #AI.
#democracy #technocracy nostr:note1p8w7cfkjcgxa282cf4tgmpv807zp5txmh9v89qmlva5h4cu8n7uqwlfe9g
The main culprit to blame for this horrendous #debate aren’t even the protagonists but the mockingbird media which intentionally dumb-down the discussion. They hate #democracy and don’t want you to have one, so they make a mockery of it with the aim that people will lose hope. Democratic governance is still the best model we have to date to take decisions at the societal level but we need to revamp it seriously. The alternative they want is a #technocracy. No thank you.
The learning from this #debate is that our democracies are confiscated by the mockingbird media. They arbitrarily choose the candidates and dumb-down the discussion with petty subjects. If we still want to live a in a democratic society in a few years we’re going to need a new toolbox.
Did you know that World Economic Forum is also involved in covering-up #AncientHistory? Indeed, the #GobekliTepe archeological site is under management of the #WEF and its excavation has remained at 5% since 2017.
#History #Archeology