Bitcoin filters be like

The fee argument is really a misunderstanding of bitcoin, bitcoin winning means fees are/will be high.

Onchain will not be for coffee, onchain will not be for everyone.

Specially multisig...

nostr:note1mly29pcshjfll2t7p09j0t6azppwmxr908fdesadyq9yx3errxjq4ghann

Transactor or miner.

Transaction or miner

Only economic nodes matter.

Isn't it nativity to believe in "no strings attached" funding?

my opinions don’t change if i learn what happened in some random convo. Bitcoin doesn’t care.

we need a healthy open source Bitcoin community. period. no matter what. Bitcoin won’t succeed without one. even if we want to ossify, Bitcoin Core 26.0 won’t last us centuries to come. open source projects need open source devs and an open source community.

we should focus on no strings attached funding for devs. the community has worked tirelessly to set this up with things like OpenSats, Brink, HRF, Chaincode, etc. to enable that effortlessly for us and the devs.

we as Bitcoiners should want devs to build whatever they think is best. engineers are the artists of the digital world. the smartest most forward thinkers in the room. we want to enable them. they aren’t ever a threat, don’t mistaken them for one. why? because the only way Bitcoin can change is if we, the network, run their code. let them create. we the network, the people, decide what gets adopted.

if someone builds something terrible, we won’t run it. that’s happened many times before. see Segwit2x, BitcoinCash, etc.

often times engineers strike moments of brilliance in Bitcoin. a very famous example is Segwit and how we got Lightning. nobody thought Segwit was possible technically. was never clear if or when we’d ever get Lightning. a few open source engineers named Luke and Eric found a brilliant solution. we adopted it. we now have Lightning being enabled by Coinbase. let engineers create art. fund and support them.

wanna ossify Bitcoin? run Core 26 forever and never update. no problem. don’t wanna fund devs? no problem. we don’t need to agree on these things. however, if you want the entire network to agree with you, you need to go out and advocate for consensus around your vision. that’s just how bitcoin works. the network moves as one, not from a meeting or self elected group.

bitcoin is a distributed network. it progresses through distributed consensus. the network will act in its own best interest, not based on anything else. fund the best engineers to protect and advance the one chance we have at reinventing money for humanity. adopt what we want, reject what we don’t. if there’s anything we need to work on every cycle with new entrants is public discourse and how to arrive at consensus as a distributed network.

also, everyone should breathe. it’s all love and gonna be ok. Bitcoin was designed to not care and last through anything 🙂

nostr:note129fcpjqxnrvrm9rzv6cmj2fu0qfatmwzh5a0nrq54alej8t9ht8qgd47wp

THIS IS NOT CONTROVERSIAL.

IF PEOPLE STOPPED SIMPING AND ASKED SAYLOR HIS OPINION HE WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO NOT SUPPORT OPEN SOURCE DEVS.

HE HAS ACTIVELY KILLED DEALS TO SUPPORT DEVS. HE IS PROUD OF IT. HE IS WRONG AND EVERYONE IS TO AFRAID TO SAY SHIT.

it’s ARK.

nostr:note1d8mrknfp3crf58ce7ue64qmtrunmfd5lsj0m29tjejcc6gfwqfeqhldhck

OPEN SOURCE CONTRIBUTORS SAID THEY WERE HAVING TROUBLE FINDING RELIABLE NO STRINGS ATTACHED SUPPORT FOR THEIR WORK.

Why?

Higher fees have been driven by spam and not by adoption. Also, #Bitcoin adoption will have little chance to increase if friction (spam and fees) does not subside.

#Bitcoin adoption > spam adoption

NEXT BLOCK FEE RIGHT NOW IS 13 SATS PER VBYTE LMFAO.

IT IS GONNA GET A LOT MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THAT AS BILLIONS BEGIN USING BITCOIN SIR. BUCKLE UP.