Avatar
volition
8ca245879378bd9cc2b3e3032f9c9d73f1ec8461218ce8c3bc806a78085a52c2
Life is the standard by which to judge good and evil | Objectivist

SV40 or simian vacuolating virus 40 (a monkey virus) maybe the cause of #turbocancer.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/sHueA1Bmxd9N/

Pregnant women especially should avoid the EUA COVID-19 vaccination boosters.

https://www.brighteon.com/ae727600-85e8-4674-b574-1d0dedb83fc6

It government regulation stopping them from just doing it, ensuring one can.

There is really no other way. Bitcoin is real money.

It’s what money represents - energy.

In a society where almost everybody agrees with what you wrote, of course hardly anyone is going to care about anyone's flip flops.

What I see around me is a lost, decaying society. My hope was that so-called "low-time-preference" Bitcoiners would try their best to reverse this deadly trend.

Clothing: If I approach someone while I'm wearing a potato sack and flip flops (zero proof of work), I'm just disrespecting them and showing how unimportant they are to me.

Language: Words matter. The words on your cup mean something. The way we use words can, whether we like it or not and whether we're trying to be funny or not, corrupt our brains: https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/obscenities-are-symptoms-of-weak-minds/ (He's talking more in the context of anger/swearing, but I think a similar message holds in general.)

It's worth mentioning that this subjectivist mentality, that things (including arts and language) are not objective, is a part of the deadly, post-modern philosophy that plagues modern universities and is a big reason why people come out of there with corrupt brains incapable of rational thinking. (It's also the exact opposite of Ayn Rand's objectivist philosophy, in case anyone is interested. I'm not saying Rand is some prophet and right about everything; I just happen to agree with her on this.)

Bitcoin is about self-reliance, respecting property, aligned with individualist philosophy, so this should ultimately lead to stronger morals and higher standards in society that will become apparent in its art over time.

It might take time to take hold and clothing may well advance with technology so will not be quite the same, but no need to become disheartened.

Politicians, or the people, need to be less altruistic to end these immoral practices that only prolong and incentivize the suffering.

Feminism achieved its goals with equal rights. At that point with no more purpose, it should have dissolved. It did not, probably because by that stage it had become its own entity and so it looked for something new to be relevant, to stay in existence.

The same has occurred with Greenpeace. It achieved its goals many years ago.

Fair question, have never crossed that line, asked the question.

Instead always just thought of it as personal choice and that their economic situation played a major role, observing that rich women typically do not work but middle class and poor women do, whilst women on the benefit also do not work being paid by the taxpayer.

Has crossed my mind that lower income couples whilst paying for children of those on the benefit may not be having children themselves because they do not earn enough.

I agree “society” should not pay, that welfare in effect is immoral.

I do however pity those in that situation.

If it is not about economics (where two incomes are needed), then each to their own.

I have met women that think staying home is boring, a complete anathema to other women I have met who stay home.