That’s interesting because I heard multiple shots. Was anyone else injured?
How did the gun get passed event security? nostr:note1uz3q7xs024trw68lemz705u36qp9axkme0vwu9f2qcde2xh6s5sq4hmtu0
nostr:note10htrd06g7syrc4cgx5sd3ua45cqh6xk92lqhxqh3tpyp7pkfxstsw5r7m5
nostr:note12j499e2dn7wmxek0h9d6ql2ezx60zauemu6k3davajs8mslpj5fq3juwwf
Look at his ear. It’s clearly intact.
Let’s wait to find out about the shooter. How many shots were heard? No one else was injured? What firearm has been recovered? Did the shooter attempt to use a handgun from that distance *in the crowd*? Or was it a rifle, again *in the crowd*? How was it passed in through security?
LOL. You and I are on exactly the same page today:
nostr:note10htrd06g7syrc4cgx5sd3ua45cqh6xk92lqhxqh3tpyp7pkfxstsw5r7m5
Got it. So “target” in front of the word abortion means ban it. But that same word in front of contraception *directly after it in the same sentence* is… ambiguous? Get real.
Ain’t no way they would allow him him expose that much skin after a real assassination attempt.
How could they know the shooter was already down?
How could they know there weren’t multiple shooters?
Yup. I just thought the same thing. It’s all a show.
nostr:note1n48dfem0h73dcdl40v6p7dy786ld86mk9u8e0n5eml0j0mrhpuhsj5hhv8
LOL.
What do you think “target” means?
Are you sure? Ear appears fine. Looks more like a blood pack to me. Used all the time in the WWE.
Clearly, you are not good at reading:
He’s distancing himself from the leaders/members of Project 2025, many of whom he has know directly and continuously for years. It’s not surprise since he says a lot of things that aren’t true. That’s evident at this point.
Let’s set “Trans sports” aside.
Are you saying that banning contraception is a “moderate” position?
Okay, so based on what the article says, can you properly explain why you think the Heritage Foundation is “not affiliated with Trump in anyway”?
Did you read the article?
Yes or no.
What’s there to lol about? Unless, do you think the Heritage Foundation is simply “Center Right”?
Did you read the article, or are you just shitposting based on the headline?
While some high time preference people are cheering for Trump to pump their bags, People Magazine is out here doing actual journalism about what a second term will look like.
For anyone who doesn’t subscribe to Christian Nationalism, it’s bleak:
https://people.com/what-is-project-2025-inside-far-right-plan-trump-presidency-8622964
nostr:npub164q45vfa8prpl7f63stsl9qm9n22v6julkasjdqxjc8kevchsj0sp42rl3
Okay, hold on. It’s certainly not great when a someone is cut off from using a service/tool they rely on, and points to the necessity of decentralized communication options.
It is also POSSIBLE that these people WERE violating Microsoft’s TOS in a variety of ways. But, more importantly, do we even know how many people have been allegedly cut off? How many people has the BBC interviewed for this story? I read the article (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cger582weplo) and it doesn’t even say how many people are affected! It could be 3 people making an accusation for all we know, and the BBC is running with it because it’ll get engagement.
To jump with both feet into accusing (((them))) of working in the background to pressure the corporation is simply conspiratorial, brain worm bullshit. Don’t do it.
Also note, from this article, “The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza says more than 38,000 people have been killed in the war.” Why are they still publishing that number when Hamas, itself, has revised that number down by 50% last month?
You guys, seriously. The tragedy of this conflict is already bad enough without spreading lies and making shit up.
nostr:note1jmku8kkfvynrwm65laznc2u236rudjg35kttyj5c2t9zn63ly3pse8v8xdIt’s hard to calculate how much I fucking love Nostr-version-Lyn.
Normal-version-Lyn is also quite awesome, too.
My kingdom for a type of popcorn that does not get stuck in one’s teeth and gums.
