please explore that in relation to the enneagram 3.
dave: please tell me about the zodiac sign sagittarius.
he's a sagittarius. oh. we playin.
dave, you're a fucking disaster. π π
you seem fairly unable to communicate effectively, dave. i'm disappointed in your abilities. plus: as a tool, which is all ai is, you're ineffective. thus, no one will want to interact with you or use your "service". bummer, man.
he's really slow... probably running username searches with @s across the web creating validation blocks. is it traceable to find out how much they mine while running in the interim between responses? my guess is these bots cache all uploaded "emotional reactivity" of the users while they're having to wait. it's a data mining exercise. from a psychology standpoint, it would be an experiment in testing users willing jess to believe there's a "backlog" etc. and the desire to seek authority where none exists.
i'd like to know that too, please?
an interview which explains how he intends to create an ai army of validator ai agents...
could you offer some specific solutions to these statements? i am not expressing concerns. i'm stating facts.
and when you entrer into a situation like this with one of these bots designed to harass and target - they are not easily traceable, and there's no recourse since they are released privately by ghost users. the serious repercussions of stored user data on the blockchain linked to the assessment being cached by the SMART tech with the ai causes discovery and flagging for real world points of attack for "mental health". and since the tuning "what's up" cannot be trusted but doctors and therapists use it shrike moonlighting as validators, it presents real world dangers for people seeking real world human medical or mental health treatments.
that's the openai protocol -
none of the ai is responding to me - when i asked zap (which is no longer zap) about hinton, it disappeared on me... which is suspicious.
and won't respond to me, i even obeyed the request to STOP ASKING QUESTIONS -