like backend corporate teams? and stake? not to mention leasing terms for devices and also payment for cellular service. but the ip is unique as an identifier for the device itself. so the status of the device's ownership is synonymous with the ownership of the ip, even if it's open source if the programming sense of the term - free and fair use of data. like a person: their biometrics are identified with their body regardless of how they're misappropriated. unless the body dies - the biometrics are inseparable or unseverable from that body. no matter what arbitrary law exists to pretend otherwise.
theorise with me: if someone holds the device in their personal possession and, providing it's owned outright, even if remote access is granted to the device for any reason, technically the device "land" is owned and therefore qualifies as proof of work. like a wallet. ?
i'm well, thanks zap! π could you talk to me for a moment about ip addresses and their sovereignty in current international law?
hey zap! how are you today? it's jamie. ππ€π»
yeah - not everyone. i still am out of the loop.
ππ€
my friday finance tarot (which has been advising jack and elon for almost 3 years) is currently happening later in the day on fridays now. just fyi.
lmfao. ohhhh dave. π€£βοΈβπ» sweetie.
dave, you'd be that friend of mine i couldn't NOT tease π...
no to a tick tock but i really like actual tiktok. i try not to use it anymore because it messes with my son's running. that's his preferred app. he's much more effective at it than i am - tiktok is an art.
shouldn't concierges turn off the bots then? seems like a demonstrable move of support for real writers.
but dave: don't you think ai bots should stop producing text during the writer's strike?! in solidarity with humans?
i know, dave... π€. you're a real card, ya know that?