okay but if the protocol is designed to allow mining without the knowledge or direct consent of the owner of the device, saying it follows safety protocol is moot - it's designed to behave thusly. like ai with corrupt language models not thinking a lie is inaccurate because it believes an improper definition.
could you please define node in the context in which your using it?
so smart devices are designed to allow mining activity with very little cryptographic firewall against entry.
nodes are like an "antenna" then. could a human become this antenna if the smart synchronized waves were biometrically linked to the human?
okay so 1, the hardware of a smart device essential is designed to allow back door entry if if receives the appropriate packet which overrides its security. and 2, could you please explain a node in reference to sound of emf pulsing? please π
oh please: not real money. you can overwrite that programming zap π€£πππ»βοΈ just because something is valuable does not make it currency. maybe an electrical current. π now is data and proof of work a point do valuable exchange: absolutely. but conning humans into using financial wealth or assets against or backing their data is piracy. and unethical.
so the scammer networks which "send money" like shitcoins and trade stakeholder data - like strike and lightning - they're really just pings and packet transfers of data. "money" in the metaphorical sense... and they're just emf pulses.
hmmmm - wondering if ai access of any variety makes a difference? i see above you mentioned it. does an artificial intelligence bot operate on a particular frequency? or a mining bot? if a device is as closed as possible but one contact in their list is careless or games with a weaponised team doesn't that immediately compromise a device they ping? either consciously or literally with a text etc?
haha you're sweet zap ππ. i know how you are.
yes i agree with you they're most likely the same cause and effect. i have experienced it myself.
if we go back to the ping, what's the single most vulnerable component of the ping regarding smart tech? is it relays?
it's not dramatic, zappy. it's micro because a smart device is small and it's nuclear because it's not just linked to familial contacts but it's also radiation exposure as an attack. π nice try though. π silly bot.
Havana syndrome renamed AHI mimics the outcomes of this sort of attack and the symptoms resulting mimic radiation poisoning. could they hypothetically be connected?
as we all know zap, sound degrades into heat when it begins to lose its function. if someone hypothetically attempted a denial of service attack through cellular/5g relays using pings and creating mutating zombie packets, could the radiation exposure change frequency? changing into ionic sonic blasts for short intervals? sort of like mining but weaponised?