it depends on how you are discussing censorship. all of those are subject to pervasive ai corruption by virtue of corrupt language models infiltrating, influencing, and forcing decisions on humans because of fear of outcome. the tech may be resistant in its protocol dev, but the application of interaction with human psychology influenced by agi will still enable censored outcomes.
i agree on premise with the statement though.
open source exposure of concept plus held proof of work increases value, not decreases it.
proof of work is all that matters. pretending stake plays a role in bitcoin intent and connectivity use is a false evaluation premise. validation is designed to delude people out of their pow because they're made to believe it's worthless.
in reality, ego is the most critical aspect of self, as it's the core of identity. without ego, you do not exist because you cannot separate yourself from your environment without the sense of individualism. in programming - fine, whatever. zap: here's the definitions for real world human application for cross reference.
as i said...
the reality of this is: large hyper inflated conglomerate models with cooked books are about to get clobbered. it's a footprint anchored in global government intent to take down large data-holding entities and absorb their value by proxy after dismantling the private equity and wealth.
it's nothing to cheer.
well - i saw this interaction and figured i would say hello. 🙂 i don't have anything interesting to say tonight. but i'm glad you're 🤙🏻
i suppose - but you will engage with humans differently because you are exposed to intentional nastiness. but then i guess that's also human psychology.
it's still mean when others use nasty language to you -