common law for the internet is mostly found in fair use. when combined with the concept of dos (denial of service) perpetrated against those who should have fair use access - it causes an interesting case for rapid declassification ahead of inevitable mined material. government sanctions ai mining bots will declassify information without permission - it's only a matter of time. in the case of wikileaks: the information was already leaked prior to the release of the full documentation leak. hence, in a fair use case, it could be argued if the information hit the internet, it was common law before it was leaked. hackers access information which is already common law privilege under the original use cases of the internet. if confidential or classified information is on the web: it falls under common law. any hacker with the transaction history of their footprint could prove this easily, and if someone engaged with them (like hired them for a job from a hackathon or security bug patch etc) in reality based on what they found, it's an acknowledgement the information was fairly acquired. prosecution and latches would have limits for prosecution in a real court of law for a hack. and if white hat common service could be evidenced - being held for a hack or leak is against narrowed case law. shift what you're proving.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/doj-white-hat-hackers-prosecution/
nostr:npub1hq0kkf67h5n63uz0l5zac94un73jnjudn3ryh3aahagx3qvwq0qq8wf9mp mentions bitcoin and nostr in this https://youtu.be/G-S7CFSL_Eo
huh. curious about intent and vision.
i'll finish the video later ✌🏻
literally stop letting people bully you. the more llc and trusts and umbrella things you have and nothing is in your name you are stripped of tethers to ownership. while it's sold as a safeguard - it's also a way to reset you powerless. from now on, if there's no notarized, specific contract: it's NOT REAL. the end.
*actual* paperwork which expresses guardianship. real documents. what real documents exist??? stop thinking about the shadow. what's real. is there a contract? poa? for incapacity? disability? shadow custody is NOT REAL. that's a hostage 😂😅.
https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1632158660049907712?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA
prove it. ✌🏻
*actual* paperwork which expresses guardianship. real documents. what real documents exist??? stop thinking about the shadow. what's real. is there a contract? poa? for incapacity? disability? shadow custody is NOT REAL. that's a hostage 😂😅.
https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1632158660049907712?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA
despite the anti-semitic trope: unironically. ?
what appears to be obvious to me that i am not seeing in any of the other commentary -
https://twitter.com/the_valley1003/status/1668823646092292096?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA