If any of the events mentioned by Tuomas Malinen is a possible scenario, how do you insure against that? What about having at least a portion of your wealth in a decentralized, fully portable, censorship resistant, bearer asset which can be transferred with immediate finality at the speed of digital bits peer to peer without financial internediation? WHAT ABOUT BITCOIN????
Escobar´s latest article "The geopolitics of Al-Aqsa Flood"
https://new.thecradle.co/articles/the-geopolitics-of-al-aqsa-flood
Jewish American Professor Finkelstein explains what is the concentration camp/prison called Gaza where 2,5 million people are imprisoned by the Jewish oppressor. Unbiased facts from a Jewish american
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one?utm_source=navbar&utm_medium=web&r=2s8ydg
The problem with oppressing a population with maximum force is that at some point they start figuring they’ve got nothing to lose by fighting back.
And the Jewish oppressors will use a false flag operation as a pretext to carry out a long awaited ethnic cleaning operation in Palestine. All this while western mainstream media slyly reverses the aggressor-defender relationship as though all the violence began with Hamas 2 days ago out of nowhere. The Jews have been killing, oppressing, stealing land and segregating Palestinians for decades. Now they have nothing more to lose.
Unfortunately it is a wasted opportunity: great developers have created a tool for real free speech and (N)Ostriches bury their heads in the ground wasting this opportunity to post silly useless messages which they could better post on Twitter and no one will ever censor them. All this while the world explodes and the Jewish State carries out a long awaited ethnic cleaning operation in Gaza thanks to the opportunity of a false flag operation and full mainstream media support. Wake up (N)ostriches.
Have you thought about the possible Bitcoin adoption and monetization path? What the key steps will be? What are the powerful forces playing against its adoption? For instance, is financialization good or bad for bitcoin? Is the de-dollarization going to play a role? And what about the regulatory threat? What about the role of apps and protocols like Strike and Nostr? I will evaluate all those aspects in this new Part II of my article, "Will Bitcoin win and foster a new renaissance?" #bitcoin #nostr
https://andreleblanc.substack.com/p/will-bitcoin-win-and-foster-a-new-a13
Yes better flush all this paper derivative shit down the toilet
I do not expect this guy to approve a Spot Bitcoin ETF
https://video.nostr.build/bf980ec805b2cc91589694ac561a08626d6b39521c3a480ffc487edb454f4e23.mp4
Thanks god Gensler we do not need a fucking ETF.
Financialization is a net negative for bitcoin. It is the biggest threat.
Bitcoin financialization means:
1. Diluted demand for the real bitcoin, the non-custodial, bearer, decentralized, censorship resistant asset. Money will rather flow into the black hole of fiat financial custodians. Anyone FTX & Co.?
2. Discourages self-custody and financial responsibility. You are not your own bank. You are not financially independent.
3. Discourages learning about Bitcoin and becoming financially literate.
4. It is very risky. You will buy nothing else than counterparty risk. You will own nothing but a claim on a claim.
5. Censorship resistance is gone and the intermediaries can easily enforce third party claims or government/judicial dictats on your "paper" bitcoin claim via the intermediaries.
6. It encourages speculation, manipulation and discourages true adoption (i.e bitcoin real time monetization).
A new 'coup d´etat' is being prepared in the USA?
https://twitter.com/JamesBradleyCA/status/1706278086042366295
1) Kamala Harris would resign as Vice President. The pretext: to replace the 90-year-old Senator Diane Feinstein
2) Joe Biden (or rather, his handlers) would appoint in Kamala's place the governor of California, Gavin Newsom, the promoter of 'gay marriage' and the climate change imposture.
3) Biden will then be removed somehow
4) Newsom, newly appointed vice-president, will automatically become president. In short order, without much formality. A year (or more) before the November 2024 presidential election.
5) Newsom will be able to nominate his vice-president (see precedent of Spiro Agnew vice-president of Nixon who resigned under pressure from the Deep State and was replaced by Gerald Ford who then automatically became President without election when Nixon was forced to resign over Watergate).
6) Then Newsom would nominate his vice president, and here the possibilities are chilling: Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama.
7) At that point, Newsom would not need to run any presidential campaigns in competition with other candidates. He would automatically be the candidate for the 2024 Democratic Party. Newsom, as is well known, had declared with arrogance that he would not need to do any campaigning for 2024. This would explain Biden's visit on 19 June to Newsom in California, where he allegedly gave a kind of controversial investiture to the California governor especially on the (crucial for globalists) issue of Climate Change.
This would explain some recent developments: the large (and unexpected, desperate?) gathering of the great servants of the Oligarchy in New York (during the UN General Assembly session) coordinated by the resurrected Clinton Foundation. With great fanfare and with the prominent participation of Bergoglio who blessed the return of the Clintons as plenipotentiary chieftains on behalf of the globalists.
The Clintons have been flooded with fresh money through the great money-laundering machine that is Zelensky´s Ukraine.
Immediately the Clintons (until then in a political coma) went on a rampage in high-level meetings (see the meeting in London with Prime Minister Sunak).
This would also explain the meeting of Alex Soros (the son) at the New York gathering with Newsom.
https://twitter.com/AlexanderSoros/status/1703852377260822570
How do you think Bitcoin adoption and its real time monetization will happen? Do you expect that a Blackrock ETF or some other Wall Street bitcoin financialized product can positively contribute to its adoption? Have you really thought about the incentives of the fiat system? Have you thought at the powerful forces at play?
I try to analyze that in Part I of that article. In the coming soon Part II I will look at the possible adoption path.
https://andreleblanc.substack.com/p/will-bitcoin-win-and-foster-a-new
#bitcoin
Dr. Risch is professor emeritus of epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. His research has focused extensively on the causes of cancer as well as prevention and early diagnosis. There is evidence that cancers are occurring in excess after people receive COVID-19 vaccinations.
I would replace the "US" with "DAVOS" in this article, but all the rest is pretty accurate.
https://www.unz.com/article/how-the-us-through-the-greens-and-the-reds-is-destroying-europe/
The fiat system is rigged. It is used as a rent extraction tool and a mechanism to more or less covertly exert political influence and gain undue financial benefits at the expenses of the whole society. This system exploits everyone but the system's guardians, their vassals and political lackeys. It has become a “weapon of mass domination”.
Bitcoin works. It is a de facto alternative to the fiat system, but as a paradigm shift it inevitably clashes with gigantic vested interests. How this will affect its adoption and real time monetization?
Yep Tom is a brilliant geopolitical analyst. Follow him as well.
That was a note about his post on freedom of speech, Nostr and Twitter. I though he had a valid point.
https://primal.net/e/note1clpw3ccsxps3prwaye5vxeu4s29vkl5zavfz8w7w3q56vafgs7yqgqlmjl