Avatar
mark tyler
9baed03137d214b3e833059a93eb71cf4e5c6b3225ff7cd1057595f606088434
Bitcoin & đŸ«‚ Oh and dimly trying to think through interesting issues. I think that I don’t have a right to force you to do anything other than not harm me or others. Seems like most people I interact with in the real world disagree with this statement. To be fair.. the devil is in definition of “harm”.

Haha. Thermal vs electrical conductivity difference. But why do they need to say “perfect” 😂

The thing I don’t understand about disagreement on what is and isn’t intelligent, is that the conversation seems to be removed from what matters, which is: are these things competing with or enhancing humans in the economy. I think it’s definitely both, but if we are formulating the word “intelligent” in a way that assumes they won’t outcompete many/most/all humans in the economy, then I think we’re in for a surprise. It turns out that things don’t need to be intelligent in the way we are to mine copper, produce desired products, and create a gigantic problem for humans trying to eat.

Replying to Avatar Stephan Rinbaum

Indeed. Hence why I detest the term "artificial intelligence", at least as it applies to what is being promulgated as such today. These "AI" bots are nothing more than a megaphone for those who program it - the bot doesn't "think", instead it simply arranges the information given to it in a readable fashion, much like an electronic calculator performs mathematical calculations. Both "AI" and the calculator provide output only under very strict rules. The difference of course is that calculators use widely accepted mathematical rules to provide the output, while "AI" uses whatever whimsical notions are provided to it as "rules" by its programmers. The "Gemini" embarrassment underscroes this truth.

"AI" can be useful, as a calculator is. It performs its duties far faster than any human can, but it does not perform any duty that could not be performed by a human, given infinite amounts of time and energy.

My own belief is that "AI" has been given its moniker intentionally to provide it some sort of respect from those foolish enough to believe the Wizard from Oz. It will be used to disseminate unpopular edicts ("well, that's what the "AI" says we have to do") and to take blame for unpopular events ("we only did what the "AI" told us to do). Now that those in power have, interntionally or not, given up media control to brqainwash the masses (well, some of the masses), "AI" will be presented as the next "unbiased deliverer of the truth", which is the exact opposite of what it is.

Homo sapiens will never individually translate as many languages as well as GPT4 does today.

If we replace “human” with “humans”, then I’ll still say the need that humans have of much more time/resources to accomplish a given task is the reason they long term won’t be hired to do tasks, so in nearly every case it won’t matter that they might be better.

Replying to Avatar Joel Walbert

I’m pretty good at thinking for myself. It’s the being right part I struggle with 😂

I had the same strong technobabble impression, so I only ever read portions, could totally be wrong, but yeah. And the thing is, bitcoin is censorship resistant lol, so you don’t even really need to start mining until your enemies are really unified and control a LOT of the network. Even having profit motivated miners control 1% of the network is probably more than enough 😂

But I totally grant the possibility that maybe it sounds insubstantial is because of top secret redactions
 idk.

IMO he only makes any sense if you assume that bitcoin will be the only widely accepted currency in the future, the threat is other people not mining transactions that are linked to you, so nation states if they can’t be anonymous will want miners. I don’t think there is any more to his thesis than that.

Aside from the above, I think his whole thing about using bitcoin to secure “certain control actions” and using energy as being better than logic for security just misunderstands how computer security and Bitcoin work.

But I’d be more than happy to find examples of some computer security thing that disproves that.

Speciate if you must, but save in #bitcoin

nostr:note1c8ryk9sukfsnrk44rn0rnpthc3ua0skd2tc3dlt3n40sn2tvu7xqug7khv

Would you agree that burger feel super KYC-free since they both have ahold of an email, maybe I’m doing it wrong?

I haven’t figured out robosats, what is there right flow?

Post collateral with which wallet? What’s the right process to sweep to cold storage?