Haha. Thermal vs electrical conductivity difference. But why do they need to say âperfectâ đ
Maybe Iâm wrong, but isnât this a part of your personal security setup that would be better to not share?
In spreadsheet form at least this is very doable.
đ
I agree on every point except the comparison to calculators. đ«
Kinda funny but I wanted to say there is no path for calculators to be able to mine and sell copper and all products with no human involvement, where LLMs do have such a path, but then I realized GPUs can be thought of as just massively parallel calculators.
The thing I donât understand about disagreement on what is and isnât intelligent, is that the conversation seems to be removed from what matters, which is: are these things competing with or enhancing humans in the economy. I think itâs definitely both, but if we are formulating the word âintelligentâ in a way that assumes they wonât outcompete many/most/all humans in the economy, then I think weâre in for a surprise. It turns out that things donât need to be intelligent in the way we are to mine copper, produce desired products, and create a gigantic problem for humans trying to eat.
Porque no los dos
Homo sapiens will never individually translate as many languages as well as GPT4 does today.
If we replace âhumanâ with âhumansâ, then Iâll still say the need that humans have of much more time/resources to accomplish a given task is the reason they long term wonât be hired to do tasks, so in nearly every case it wonât matter that they might be better.
I had the same strong technobabble impression, so I only ever read portions, could totally be wrong, but yeah. And the thing is, bitcoin is censorship resistant lol, so you donât even really need to start mining until your enemies are really unified and control a LOT of the network. Even having profit motivated miners control 1% of the network is probably more than enough đ
But I totally grant the possibility that maybe it sounds insubstantial is because of top secret redactions⊠idk.
IMO he only makes any sense if you assume that bitcoin will be the only widely accepted currency in the future, the threat is other people not mining transactions that are linked to you, so nation states if they canât be anonymous will want miners. I donât think there is any more to his thesis than that.
Aside from the above, I think his whole thing about using bitcoin to secure âcertain control actionsâ and using energy as being better than logic for security just misunderstands how computer security and Bitcoin work.
But Iâd be more than happy to find examples of some computer security thing that disproves that.
Speciate if you must, but save in #bitcoin
nostr:note1c8ryk9sukfsnrk44rn0rnpthc3ua0skd2tc3dlt3n40sn2tvu7xqug7khv
Bitcoin winning users one NGU at a time, winning converts one bear market at a time
Theoretically there would be something that changes if you individually opt out, but what?
Would you agree that burger feel super KYC-free since they both have ahold of an email, maybe Iâm doing it wrong?
I havenât figured out robosats, what is there right flow?
Post collateral with which wallet? Whatâs the right process to sweep to cold storage?


