Your provocation about Freud is unnecessary. anyway, I have some bikini photos when I post them, I will accompany them with philosophical expressions so that people will not remain ignorant.

Your provocation about Freud is unnecessary. anyway, I have some bikini photos when I post them, I will accompany them with philosophical expressions so that people will not remain ignorant.

I don't believe Freud ever said that all psychosis is rooted in sexual abuse during childhood... or anything close to that.

A displacement mechanism is like projection. Essentially, when you direct your emotions towards a surrogate. Like how you got so extra aggressive towards me. Is it really me, or something else?

I think you're thinking of disassociation. To disconnect from reality.

Which actually makes me think of another book I thought about suggesting. I read it as a kid. It's called you don't know me by Klass. It's about a boy with an abusive father who develops a dissociative disorder and lives in his head. He plays the tuba in school and pretends its a frog. His defense was his overactive imagination. One day he has a breakdown in band class and cries that the frog (his tuba) died. It's fascinating from a psychological standpoint. And relatable to anyone who went through trauma. I haven't read it in like 20 years (i read it whenit was new)... but I still recommend it. I cried.

Anyway....

I'm glad you're using your brain though.

Everything else is pretty good. That is to say, you're not completely wrong.

Also...

Usually people just call it hijacking... when problematic people join an ideology, cause, religion, or whatever.... so on and so forth.

here's an example. it is a girl. let's call her May. May is a minor girl who faced sexual assault at a young age. And based on Freud's psychoanalysis, every psychosis is rooted in childhood sexual abuse.

May's protective displacement mechanism is directing her toward "trouble" and inappropriate behavior to forget her childhood trauma. as she is unable and ready to face her trauma.

May does not know what is happening to him, the protective mechanisms prevent him from seeing reality. she is not ready to accept reality and the survival instinct is stronger than her traumas.

suppose that even this behavior would not be able to give peace because it would simply increase her traumas, so she develops what psychology calls the protective mechanism of isolation or intellectualism. she justifies her behavior in an intellectual way, like the right to her body blah blah blah..

May continues to have emotional illiteracy and instead of facing her problem of seeing reality with pragmatic eyes, a habitat called "feminism" joins, which supports May.

so she supports this ideology within this habitat to justify her actions but not that she doesn't feel less animal and her competitive instincts have died.

so this kind of dogma that she supports makes her feel comfortable.

so I personally do not believe that May is a feminist, but I believe that she is fighting to be accepted by others as she is. I'm repeating it.

to be aware and again to do something because you have empathy and think it is right to do it, without including the ego is something very rare. the essence of feminism is to protect women. Also, the essence of psychiatric institutions is to cure patients with mental problems, but drugs and therapy do not work, they simply make people addicted to drugs and legal poison. Even feminism, even though it basically has the protection of women, the moment it becomes popular, large masses of problematic people join it, it starts to go out of its framework, it loses its purpose and does not heal your wound.

it is the same as with all dogmas, which may in essence seem perfect and beautiful, but when practiced by people they turn into chaos.

Tastes like almonds

High in protein

GrapheneOS is good if you've got to carry one. The point is never to forget that if you're carrying a phone, you're still being tracked, even if you're limiting the damage from app-based threats. It is baked into the design oftheinfrastructure: if you can see the network, the network can see you. And it takes notes.

Now imagine if everybody would do this. Additionally devices could connect as a mobile meshnet.

Don't worry, it's going to get worse.

In a few words, they will always find us in some way if we are a target.

Incredible how we got to this point. 🫤

People really don't realize how utterly dependent modern surveillance is on the idea that everybody is carrying a phone — which is always tracked. Their car has a cellular modem in it — which is always tracked. 99% of investigation is one guy and a search box. If you're not low-hanging fruit, you aren't gonna merit the Eye of Sauron of manual, well-resourced, focused team attention—and if you did, you probably planned ahead for it, right? Because it's not a mystery what would get you on Santa's Naughty List.

Anyway, the point is that even in a big city, the phoneless guy in a "covid" mask is going to be invisible to anything less than that exhaustive manual investigation — at least for a few more years. That may go away once they start networking all the cameras and having AI start trying to match up clothing sets moving from camera to camera, butthat capability is hard to hide, so it'll be in the news. And it won't work that well in places with less camera density and, perhaps, for people who wear the most-common outfits (the visual equivalent of a "shared fingerprint").

Remember: Phones are useful, but dangerous. And the people who will still wear covid masks to the beach are helping to normalize facial obscurity—regardless of their intention. Don't be mean to them. Encourage them to wear them everywhere. For passport photos. In police booking photos. At the customs desk. Family portraits! The sky is the limit—let them push the boundaries so that you don't have to.

nostr:note1dufu3sutqcu4er2pj9k7zmxdf7k23qxn3eskwdr8tp3ffvg7g9qqsv4lrc