Draw the line really fast.

The spikes + cracked window seem like a deterrent to keep children inside. I don't see how this would be for environmental reasons, especially in the summer. I also can't believe that it's illegal for the British to open their window all the way. I'm guessing it's a rule for rental properties, which is hilarious.

Uh... my guess is it's a child lock to stop children from falling out?

I've heard it called summer and winter mode. And yeah, you have it right, hot air rises, cool air sinks. Switching it to "winter mode" in the summer is retarded, the point of the fan is to move air around, encouraging evaporation from your skin, keeping you cooler.

Yes. Alex is the biggest retard on the planet.

I would prefer characters not to give me stuff just because I'm the main character. Like how in the first pokemon game, the only way to get surf is to find a guy's dentures. I get that him just giving it to me effectively changes nothing, but it's fun trying to figure out what this mumbling retard wants.

Mary Sue MC is one of the worst parts of modern gaming. Just being given stuff isn't fun, why don't game devs get that?

President of Gabongo, Mr.Bongo doing the Conga in the Congo.

That's nothing new.

So now there are literal spear chuckers running around San Antonio, Tx.

https://i.poastcdn.org/9b039a99585f09edfddb4997d165535b69b33ac355f6f452c971f3a60a8d2268.mp4

"Five sugars in the pepsi"

>Coke

>Four sugars

You have to, it's the only way to catch them all.

I need an AI to combine both images, and make the person in the final result an anime girl.

Well, that's good to know then!

Me too.

>Gets a 30 year loan.

>"What the fuck?! Why is this taking 30 years to pay off. What the fuck!!!"

It's crazy how hard it is to explain to them that that in a global free market, companies will always move to where ever labor is cheapest.

Gayest pokemon.

Hmm.

First, I don't think momentum is conserved by portals (it is conserved relative to the portals, but not globally). Momentum is a vector quantity, meaning it's dependent on direction. Objects exit portals relative to the normal vector of the second portal. So momentum can be conserved depending on the arrangement, but it can also be "reflected" or rotate the momentum vector 180 degrees to itself before it entered the portal. However, since no momentum seems to be transferred to the portal or the surface it's on (think throwing a rubber ball against a brick wall, a little momentum is transferred to the wall to reflect it), it seems that momentum isn't conserved.

The thing that does seem to be conserved is "speed" (but not kinetic energy). The question now is "speed relative to what?" I think it's impossible to say for certain, there are a lot of arguments to be made either way, but I think the easiest answer is "your speed relative to the first portal you enter". So in this case, I believe the people would fly out of the second portal when hit by the portal on the train.

Another example to think about is a portal in a falling elevator. While it's in free-fall, how would someone exit the portal? I don't think they'd be shot out of the portal if they exited it, so portals likely conserve your speed relative to the portal you enter.

In this example you could also make a spaceship that runs off free energy engine, hence energy isn't conserved either. The spring mass is tossed to the front of the ship, hits the wall and bounces off (transferring a little of it's momentum). It then travels back relative to portal 1 with a speed greater than it's initial speed. Exists portal two, adding even more momentum (since it's moving faster), it bounces off again, and repeats the process.

Unless portals and the things that goes through them consume energy from the gun, portals violate conservation of momentum and energy.