Lol .. 90 percent of world still uses Windows !

ben is 100% right here

What people think holding is: Drunken typo meme: rallying cry to to attain Lamborghinis.

What hodling really is: Test from god/ancient rite: only those who stomach chaos long enough get invited to design the next global order.

I have avoided inflammatory language for the last 2 years and tried to remain a cooler head despite how passionately I've disagreed with Core.

But it's undeniable now. Bitcoin Core is overtly malicious and attempting to destroy the one chance we get at breaking away from fiat.

Yes. Too many think that ideas are valuable. They aren't. Ideas are abundant and free. Execution is scarce and valuable.

Can someone explain how Ross is not on any relays but clearly is getting reach and able to interact?

Dumb phones are like leftist governments telling what you can and cannot do.

Most of you say "I've learned so much vibe coding" and that's great. What you mean though is like learning physics by watching YouTube videos. What I mean is learning physics by going through hell, solving problems night over night and losing sleep and hope, thinking that you will fail, and then having the aha moment that nothing else can give you than sustained hard core pain.

Nothing can do the learning for you and your brain's capacity is limited. Experiencing that limit and being comfortable with it is what makes you a great coder / mathematician / physicist imo.

Do people really live like this?

nostr:note17zhfq0hv3aec8c29z6f7l5g6jqhs9fgq68h6jlxa9jpk6ag0e4fsglpwuh

I still don't understand how a chat bot could be called or could spawn "AI" let alone "AGI".

I think it's clear we can have ever better machines (which is all these are) and that they could be so sophisticated that they could trick a human into thinking they are intelligent, but they still lack even the very basics of intelligence.

> People naturally try to compare Agent-1 to humans, but it has a very different skill profile. It knows more facts than any human, knows practically every programming language, and can solve well-specified coding problems extremely quickly. On the other hand, Agent-1 is bad at even simple long-horizon tasks, like beating video games it hasn’t played before.

I think that sums it up. It's not going to get magically better at doing things it has never done before. Whereas a hamster or a human can approach a new task and intuit how to complete it. A machine that stamps out square widgets is not going to suddenly stamp out circle widgets. Yes, you can have a second machine that stamps out the parts the first machine would need to make circles, and have a third machine switch out the parts. That's very very efficient, will replace jobs, but it's not intelligence. It's just turtles all the way down.

It is called technology progress.

We all have to use it as a useful tool and not a weapon.

Even if some will use it as weapon we will have to use it as a shield.

It is human that are creating this, so it is up to us to make it the best way.