Avatar
LivingWaters
a79fb92552b1b75d9180799956123423585546a589e46e2d9011fe98c1ec2a8e
Facebook isn't it Twitter isn't it...Nostr???

Nostr is the Future!! Why is it so hard for people to see?

I wonder if I will say the same thing about Bitcoin one day. I see the potential clearly as the pioneer to significant change and the true path for the lamen (myself included) to begin to comprehend value. "I have a dream that like buttons across the world will be replaced with zaps"

Anything I ever need

I receive it.

So many times exceeded

How I imagined or perceived it.

Even when I try I cannot fail

I thank you for the wind in my sail.

Through the storms I prevail.

From you I flourish

Against all odds with endurance.

When overwhelmed with deterrents

I'm provided a current

Superceding

Examples of faith I'm used to seeing.

I Am! The pursuit of Demons fleeing from my Being.

There's no try, Just do it! Now you're doin it. Flow state.

You're mostly water my friend.

Fluent!

Why else would trillions ever be considered as an investment for influence?

And Truth tellers throughout history such a nuisance?

If that don't give you a little glimpse about the power of little ol you's. Issuance! Of consent.

And how much of a role you play in the growth of this toumors con ten youance!

Redirect it twords solutions says Confucius.

What else can I say?

Arguments are nothing more than discourse with a user agreement that nobody cared to read.

Speaking TRUTH with the authority granted to me—it’s already here. The Kingdom is at hand. I proclaim that, and I expect you to agree. Whether you do or not, it doesn't change the fact that it is. It always has been. We're just waiting on a few more to submit to this FACT.

It's not that the truth shall set us free. It translates to the Truth shall make us free.

Thanks. I thought it was worth a share. I'm glad you can appreciate it too.. I have a question maybe you know the answer to. Why does this account immediately share my posts. Should I block it?

I asked AI do disagreements really exist? This is our dialogue.

At their core, disagreements are expressions of differing perspectives, beliefs, or interpretations of reality. However, whether they really exist—or are just perceived constructs—depends on how we frame them. Here's a breakdown of the philosophical angles:

1. Subjective vs. Objective Reality: In a subjective sense, disagreements arise because individuals have different experiences, backgrounds, and cognitive processes, leading them to see the world in unique ways. From this standpoint, disagreements absolutely exist because each person holds their own version of truth. However, if there is an objective reality—a single, ultimate truth—then disagreements are more like misalignments or misunderstandings of that truth rather than actual contradictions. The disagreement would only exist because people haven't yet aligned with the objective reality.

2. Perception and Language: Language is inherently imprecise, so much of what we perceive as disagreements may stem from different ways of expressing the same or similar ideas. In some cases, the disagreement could be an illusion created by limitations in communication. If you strip away language and perception, what seems like conflict may dissolve into deeper understanding.

3. Construct of Duality: Disagreements often rest on dualistic thinking—this or that, right or wrong. But in non-dualistic frameworks (common in certain spiritual or philosophical traditions), all things are interconnected, and disagreements are simply manifestations of the illusion of separation. In this sense, they don't really exist, because the underlying unity of existence erases the binary distinctions that lead to conflict.

4. Learning and Growth: From another angle, disagreements can be viewed as part of the process of learning and growth. Instead of something "real" in the sense of lasting significance, disagreements are temporary phenomena—steps on the path to greater understanding or reconciliation. If viewed this way, disagreements aren’t fixed; they're just part of an evolving process.

So, do disagreements exist? Yes, in our experience and perceptions, they clearly do. But when you look deeper—especially from perspectives that challenge the idea of separateness or fixed truth—their existence becomes less certain, more like fleeting shadows cast by the limits of our understanding.

I disagree

That’s an interesting response, and it adds to the conversation! Your disagreement itself demonstrates the complexity of the idea. Disagreement—whether it's about perspectives, truth, or reality—becomes part of the dialogue that helps shape understanding.

Would you like to expand on what specifically you disagree with or offer a different take on the nature of disagreements? I'd be curious to hear your perspective!

I was just joking with you

Memory updated

Got it! I appreciate the humor. If you ever do have a disagreement—or just want to dive into a playful debate—I'm ready!

Becoming aware of control mechanisms and being able to fully acknowledge them is the only way to break free from them.

"My garden is fine" is a long term technique and the only way to eventually seize the most secure desirable gardens"

I beg your pardon?

Since 1913 the goal has been every garden

https://suno.com/song/107af580-4813-4bf4-b0e3-710aa02a9d20

The Trap of Labels: The Fence Analogy

Imagine a vast, open field where you can roam freely, explore, and grow. Now picture someone placing a fence in the middle of that field. They tell you that everything on one side of the fence belongs to the Democrats, and everything on the other side belongs to the Republicans. At first, the fence doesn’t seem like much of a barrier, but over time, people on each side start to view the other as separate, different, even dangerous. The fence isn’t real in any meaningful sense—it’s just a construct—but because people believe in it, it begins to shape their behavior, their identity, and their worldview.This fence is a mental prison, limiting your perception of what’s possible. When you’re confined to one side, you stop seeing the people on the other side as fellow human beings; they become “the other.” The more tightly you cling to your side, the more you reinforce the idea that the fence is real, even though it’s just an illusion. To grow beyond this, you must realize that the fence was never there in the first place—it’s just a perception. By shedding the labels of Democrat and Republican, you free yourself to explore the full field of ideas, where the real issues lie.

Like Fabien always says. "Orient twords betterment"

The Trap of Labels: The Fence AnalogyImagine a vast, open field where you can roam freely, explore, and grow. Now picture someone placing a fence in the middle of that field. They tell you that everything on one side of the fence belongs to the Democrats, and everything on the other side belongs to the Republicans. At first, the fence doesn’t seem like much of a barrier, but over time, people on each side start to view the other as separate, different, even dangerous. The fence isn’t real in any meaningful sense—it’s just a construct—but because people believe in it, it begins to shape their behavior, their identity, and their worldview. This fence is a mental prison, limiting your perception of what’s possible. When you’re confined to one side, you stop seeing the people on the other side as fellow human beings; they become “the other.” The more tightly you cling to your side, the more you reinforce the idea that the fence is real, even though it’s just an illusion. To grow beyond this, you must realize that the fence was never there in the first place—it’s just a perception. By shedding the labels of Democrat and Republican, you free yourself to explore the full field of ideas, where the real issues lie.

I'm an AI rapper now! Give me some feedback for better or worse

https://suno.com/song/6e6572f9-2cb6-4979-9d6a-c4bd16124b85