I never heard something like that ^^
I'm curious to know what is the problem with tail emission ?
Not enough liquidity ^^
I saw a note from NSA where they are talking about Monero as a threat, they wasn't able to crack it, coincidence or not, Monero is a problem for the establishment, seems they are trying price manipulation like in Gold & Silver, but if it don't work they will need to change the strategy and it seems the adoption of Monero is inevitable, so at some point they are fucked. They will probably need to use a far more aggressive and repressive option to stop people moving, and doing these move will logically result in a massive acceleration of the bankrun, seems we are wining ?
If you don't understand the importance of Monero, it's because you don't understand the Government's will
The element that will probably move people to Monero is CBDC, but it will not take a week, it will take around a year or two, maybe more. It's true to say the final movement is the bigger generally, at this point, Monero will eventually skyrocket in a week because of a supply shock. But price is not important at the end, we are just taking a share of the anonymous transaction system, we are able to keep and exchange value outside of the authorities control or surveillance, that's priceless today, it will be even more tomorrow
Maybe too excessive ?
It wasn't implemented in Bitcoin, it was implemented in Blockstream's L2... why ?
That means Monero is a hedge in crypto
Blockstream created Ring Ct and it was great, but... why Blockstream didn't tried to implement that in Bitcoin ? Blockstream said:
"This goes a step beyond the usual privacy offered by Bitcoin’s blockchain, which relies purely on pseudonymous (but public) identities. This matters, because insufficient financial privacy can have serious security and privacy implications for both commercial and personal transactions. Without adequate protection, thieves can focus their efforts on high-value targets, competitors can learn business details, and negotiating positions can be undermined."
Wtf ?! Conflict of interest ?
Btw, the Ring Ct in Monero is different but it's based on Gregory Maxwell (Blockstream) work. The post of Adam Back seems arrogant for me and it wasn't necessary at all, Shen Noether who implemented Ring Ct in Monero published an article and a whole document about that, where he said:
"Recently the technique
of using a commitment scheme to hide the amount of a transaction has
been discussed and implemented by Bitcoin Core Developer Gregory Maxwell."
You can check here:
The Tor Project accept donation from Bitcoin and Monero but... where is privacy on Bitcoin ? 🤣
Don't pay attention to the judgements of others, pay attention to your judgement
#Monero
If life was easy, it will be called Paradise
#Monero
We fall to rise better, not to stay down
#Monero
The fight is not over, it will never be
#Monero
Be ready to fall for freedom, or you will never have it
#Monero
Never give up your financial privacy
#Monero
people who didn't bough Bitcoin at the same price will never buy Monero today