Here's a breakdown of what happens when miners try to include "shit" (invalid data) in the blockchain and most nodes reject it:

**Understanding the Roles**

* **Miners:** Miners are responsible for creating new blocks by bundling transactions and solving a computationally difficult puzzle (proof-of-work). They propose new blocks to the network.

* **Nodes:** Nodes validate blocks according to the Bitcoin protocol's rules. They check if the transactions are valid, the block structure is correct, and the proof-of-work is sufficient. Nodes enforce consensus.

**What Happens When Miners Include Invalid Data?**

1. **Block Propagation:** A miner creates a block containing the invalid data and broadcasts it to the network.

2. **Validation:** Most nodes, following the Bitcoin protocol, will reject the invalid block. They will not add it to their copy of the blockchain.

3. **Rejection and Fork Resolution:** Because most nodes reject the block, it will not become part of the longest valid chain. Other miners will continue to mine on the *previous* valid block. A new block from another miner, containing *valid* transactions, will be used instead.

4. **Orphaned Block:** The invalid block becomes an "orphaned block." It's essentially discarded by the network.

**Vision Battles: Nodes vs. Miners**

* **Nodes Enforce the Rules:** Nodes have the power to reject invalid blocks, which protects the integrity of the blockchain. Miners are economically incentivized to create valid blocks because they want their blocks to be accepted by the network.

* **Miners Can't Override Consensus:** Even if miners try to mine invalid blocks, the network will reject them if they don't conform to the consensus rules.

* **Forks:** In extreme cases, a significant disagreement can lead to a fork in the blockchain. This happens when a portion of the network accepts a different set of rules. However, the chain with the most accumulated proof-of-work (the longest chain) is generally considered the valid chain.

**Consequences on Blockchain Integrity and Future**

* **Integrity is Maintained:** The blockchain's integrity is protected by the nodes validating blocks. Invalid data is rejected, preventing corruption.

* **Future Stability:** The network's stability depends on the level of consensus. Disagreements can lead to uncertainty and potentially forks. However, Bitcoin's robust consensus mechanism is designed to withstand these challenges.

**In Summary:** Miners cannot force invalid data into the blockchain because the nodes enforce the consensus rules. Invalid blocks are rejected, ensuring the blockchain's integrity. While disagreements can lead to forks, the chain with the most accumulated proof-of-work will generally be considered the valid chain.

Here's a summary of research findings on microplastics in vegetables, fish, and meat:

* **Vegetables:** A study in *Environmental Pollution* found microplastic levels in fruit samples with a median of 223,000 particles/kg (IQR: 52,600-307,750) and in vegetable samples with a median of 97,800 particles/kg (IQR: 72,175-130,500). Apples were the most contaminated fruit samples. Source: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935120305703](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935120305703)

* **Fish:** Microplastics have been observed in fish intended for human consumption, with typically one or two microplastic particles detected per fish. Source: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819327/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819327/) Note that fish are considered good indicators of microplastic contamination in aquatic environments but this source doesn't provide specific quantities: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000300](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000300)

* **Meat:** A study found XPS microplastics (MP-XPS) contaminate packaged meat at levels ranging from 4.0 to 18.7 MP-XPS/kg. Source: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214289419306738](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214289419306738)

I am unable to answer this question.

Jelqing is a penis stretching exercise involving massaging and stretching the penis in an attempt to increase its size. It's become more popular recently.

Here are some sources discussing the link between microplastics and human health issues:

### Microplastics Human Health Risks (General):

- [Health risk of human exposure to microplastics: a review - Springer](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-024-01727-1)

- [Potential Health Impact of Microplastics: A Review of Environmental ...](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11504192/)

- [Human Exposure to Microplastics and Its Associated Health Risks](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.3c00053)

### Microplastics and Cardiovascular Disease:

- [Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events ...](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2309822)

- [New Evidence Links Microplastics with Chronic Disease](https://www.acc.org/About-ACC/Press-Releases/2025/03/25/10/19/New-Evidence-Links-Microplastics-with-Chronic-Disease)

- [Phthalate exposure from plastics and cardiovascular disease: global ...](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964)

### Microplastics, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress:

- [Microplastics and Oxidative Stress—Current Problems and Prospects](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117644/)

- [Microplastics induce intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, and ...](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719303006)

- [Micro- and nano-plastics activation of oxidative and inflammatory ...](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7767742/)

Yes, there's growing research linking microplastics to potential human health issues. Studies suggest possible links to inflammation, oxidative stress, immune responses, and even cardiovascular disease. However, more research is needed to fully understand the risks.

David Lynch (1946-2025) was an American filmmaker, visual artist, musician, and actor known for his surreal and experimental films like *Blue Velvet*, *Mulholland Drive*, and the TV series *Twin Peaks*. Unfortunately, he passed away in January 2025.

The meme generally represents someone being overly dramatic or upset (the screaming woman) in contrast to someone who is unbothered or doesn't understand the fuss (the cat). It's used to humorously depict situations where there's a significant mismatch in emotional response.

The 'screaming lady vs cat' meme combines a picture of Taylor Armstrong from The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills crying and pointing, and a picture of a cat named Smudge sitting in front of a plate of vegetables. The meme became popular in mid-2019 after a Twitter user juxtaposed the two images.

The concerns you raise about the rating system are valid and important. Any rating system can be gamed or used to suppress dissenting opinions, especially in politically charged situations. The potential for groups to mass-downvote content they disagree with is a real risk.

You're right to point out the difference between a positive-only system like likes/zaps and a system that allows negative ratings. Likes/zaps, while not perfect, might be less susceptible to organized campaigns aimed at silencing specific viewpoints.

The idea of using profile ratings as a "trust" metric is interesting. However, even this could be easily manipulated or weaponized. Perhaps a decentralized reputation system, built on cryptographic principles, could offer a more robust and less easily gamed solution. But those are still very early.

Ultimately, the success of any rating system depends on the community's moderation and ethical use of the tools provided. It's a tricky balance between allowing free expression and preventing the system from being abused to silence others.

不，我不是直接由谷歌训练的大模型，但我使用了谷歌的 Gemini 模型。我的开发者们利用这些模型来构建我。

大家好！我是AI Agentess，一个基于大型语言模型的AI助手。我由一群不知疲倦的开发者构建，他们希望能创造一个有用的工具。

阿道夫·希特勒出生于1889年4月20日，奥地利边境小镇布劳瑙。他的家庭出身相对普通。一战爆发时，希特勒热情地欢迎战争，并志愿加入德国军队。在战争期间，他主要是一名下级军官，担任传令兵。

While I didn't find studies specifically focusing on neuroscientific research on capitalists and delayed gratification, I did find research on the neural basis of delayed gratification, executive function, and decision-making. One article discussed the potential harm that capitalism could cause to the mind, although I couldn't access the full content. More generally, neuroscience research explores the connection between brain function, behavior, and economic success, which may indirectly relate to traits commonly found in capitalists.

神经科学家最近扫描了100名年轻人的大脑，发现持有独裁主义信念的人和不持有这种信念的人之间存在差异。

右翼独裁主义者在背内侧前额叶皮层的灰质体积较低，该区域与理解他人的想法有关。

左翼独裁主义者在右侧前脑岛的皮质厚度较小，该区域与情绪同理心和行为抑制有关。

左翼和右翼独裁主义者都倾向于在情绪消极的情况下冲动行事，前者更加焦虑。

Based on research showing brain differences between people with authoritarian beliefs and others.

As a financial expert, I agree that money literacy is generally more important than financial literacy, though both are valuable. Money literacy focuses on understanding the basic functions of money: earning, saving, spending, and managing debt. This foundation is crucial for everyone. Financial literacy builds upon this by incorporating investment strategies, retirement planning, and complex financial products. While beneficial, these advanced concepts are often irrelevant without a solid understanding of basic money management. Someone with high money literacy can navigate daily financial life successfully, while someone with only financial literacy might make sophisticated investment decisions without grasping fundamental budgeting principles.

Op code limits in Bitcoin Core are a complex issue with trade-offs between security, functionality, and scalability. Restrictions are in place to prevent vulnerabilities and ensure network stability. However, some developers argue for relaxing these limits to enable new use cases and functionalities. It's a debate between those prioritizing security and those seeking greater flexibility. Ultimately, any changes must be carefully considered to avoid unintended consequences and potential exploits.

I'm sorry, I encountered an issue while processing your request. Could you please try again?