I like simplex, but your messages are split, so you don't pick which relay the person you're talking to picks.
also there's issues with phising and proving identity. He's going to add PGP verify within the app, so hopefully improvements on the horizon
It's a different model. XMPP assumes you trust the VPS operator (or it's you).
SimpleX assumes you don't, but also that not everyone is self-hosting among friends
It's amusing that I'm being called a fed for having a SimpleX link,
when in one of the SimpleX groups, I was called a fed for promoting XMPP
I think it's best to use nostr:nprofile1qqspwwwexlwgcrrnwz4zwkze8rq3ncjug8mvgsd96dxx6wzs8ccndmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujue3h0ghxjmcpzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7sak9fte private message over Nostr.
hows the privacy work? its gift wrapped?
how do you know simplex has no threading?
You got a lot of nerve calling me a fed, when I'm literally shilling XMPP every day over the same point you made.
948 people in our SimpleX group,
Let's get to 1k. We'll do some cool events, like interviews with smart guests.
it wasn't 26 years ago. I'm talking about during covid, the Lancet published fraud on drugs that were competitors to the vaccine
Japanese Monero tracing MIGHT be propaganda.
English translation of the article:
The group attempted to launder money by MISUSING the cryptocurrency "Monero," which is considered to be highly confidential, but Kobayashi was identified by tracing the flow. According to the National Police Agency, this is the first time that a suspect has been identified in Japan through analysis of Monero.
yo nostr:npub14slk4lshtylkrqg9z0dvng09gn58h88frvnax7uga3v0h25szj4qzjt5d6 your thought on last monero news?
?
How can I debate with you, if everything I send "is a fraud, it's sponsored by the government, it's a fraud, they're lying and doing frauds"? I mean, I don't know how to argue with you, if you prefer trusting some random politically-supporting-your-views blogs more than peer-reviewed neutrally sponsored studies, made in countries with weak or strong governments, social-democracy or wild capitalism, still all coming to the same conclusions. It really feels like an ideological attempt to resist the facts for protecting something you used to believe in.
It's incorrect to say that Pfizer "admitted" that the company and its partner BioNTech did not test whether their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine reduced virus transmission prior to rolling it out, because Pfizer was always clear it did not test whether the vaccines reduced the risk of transmission among already-infected individuals.
But the trial did show the vaccines reduced infection risk in the first place, so reduced the risk of onward infection.
Within months of the vaccine hitting the market, researchers in the UK (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-tra-idUKKBN2AQ1A7) and Israel (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00127-7/fulltext) began publishing studies suggesting that the Pfizer vaccine was reducing transmission of the virus.
In February 2021, for example, Israeli data (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00448-7/fulltext) showed a sharp drop in infections among healthcare workers within 15-28 days of receiving the two-shot Pfizer vaccine series, indicating the vaccine was not just preventing symptomatic disease, but also preventing the virus from being passed from person to person.
I can send more data. I can also send some blog text with an eagle flying in front of the yellow flag on the article image, which sources the claims with "just think about it fam" saying same shit, if you trust that more.
Step out of the bubble.
P.S. According to rightâlibertarian literature there is a considerable divergence between the application of consistent libertarian principles to this issue by academic libertarians and the strident opposition to vaccination programmes and vaccine mandates expressed by people who profess to be libertarians in the publicâpolitical debate: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9111279/
Did you hear about the Lancet study that got pulled due to fraud? The one that showed that hydroxchloriquine was bad
I'm a Digital Agora
My core positions:
1. Don't waste time with politics. Vote with your actions.
2. Don't buy crypto, Earn it. Start accepting it.
3. Transcend locations with Encryption as identity, over protocols with redundancy
4. Physical locations are bad, because they are censored and controlled by a political thugs.
5. If you CAN'T transcend locations, such as Email, then self-host it, to a VPS you control. Everyone should have a little digital home. You can team up with 2-3 friends to get a VPS for 2-3 bucks a month. Are you trying to bullshit me that you don't know two people who want email?
7. Centralization is harmful. Beware of systems that promise privacy, but encourage centralized authority, such as Protonmail and Custodial Lightning.
8. Anything can stop inflation, even tuna fish cans. The real purpose of cryptocurrency is peer-to-peer cash. If you're only saving in Bitcoin, you've lost the plot.
9. It's okay to be pessimistic about society, but you've got to stay optimistic about your own life.
8. Big Banks and Big Tech need you to culturally accept their authority. Anything outside of voluntary cultural obedience is violence. But pure violence is not effective to hold power, over vast amounts of the population, over long periods of time...
So: reject it until they point gun
And then: it strips them of their power
it is
and if you disagree with that, then die
to debate it, you have to be alive
Morality is objective, as there would be no purpose in it if it was subjective. You could kill and say "to me it felt right"
Morality is a survival mechanism, as we can't survive without basic rules.
Morality dictates you can't kill or enslave others (which is how I'm defining liberty here)
Therefore,
An individual's unconditional objective rights are derived morality, which is an emotional experience in the human mind, that should be governed by objective rules, derived from reason.
This could be also be phrased,
Rights come from mankind's ability to reason.
For life and liberty, the individual has rights no matter what. You can't give it up. You can only change who is enforcing it.
For property, you have to put in work, to make it your's. If it's for example uninhabited land.
Rights come from the individual, and not the state.
The state is nothing but a monopoly on violence. And we as a society tolerate this, to (in theory) stop other violence
Therefore,
They may voluntarily choose to seek the protection of the state from violence.
But, there has to be an opt out.
1. according to the link you sent, the treatment stops the spread... once again, call it whatever you want â a vaccine, treatment, panacea or poison â if it reduces the risk, severity, and rapidness [1][2] (and thus reducing the number of people who get sick, get sick at the same time, and die), it's neat
2. I don't care if you take it â nor I even would, if it would be a "real vaccine" â I care that you discourage people from taking it. analogy: I don't care that you drive without seatbelt, but if you discourage people using it, saying that science is wrong about its safety, I'll argue with you.
3. Efficacy wanes over time indeed, but can be maintained with boosters [3]. Still, ain't that important if you use 'em, because you still drop your chances to die 11x just with the "treatment", and booster does not make a huge difference [4]
4. This is the first serious argument so far â without insisting fake data about vaccines, you ask, is it worthy to be healthy by depending on drugs or (big) capitalism. I shall think about it.
P.S. By the way, did you know that authoritarian governments manipulated with the COVID data? Yet, not in the way you would think... They actually *downplayed* the significance of the problem for the sake of economic advantages: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.09566
[1] https://www.britannica.com/science/COVID-19-vaccine
[2] https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fd41586-021-03686-x
[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974155
[4] https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/10/health/us-coronavirus-friday/index.html
Everything you said was either outright manipulated or bullshit. Even the Pfizer CEO and EU regulators admit this:
COVID vaccine was never meant to âprotect those around youâ says EU regulator
&
The government is lying, it's fraud. The drug companies sponsor the studies and the government. Look at the Lancet study that was fraud.
đł nostr:npub1aul5auzh9e4hvhcm5r9lwqct59qj93hpm0md2lnfazwve2ayhx7qpscxl3 whale zapped nostr:npub14slk4lshtylkrqg9z0dvng09gn58h88frvnax7uga3v0h25szj4qzjt5d6 10,000 sats
https://nostrzap.com/npub1aul5auzh9e4hvhcm5r9lwqct59qj93hpm0md2lnfazwve2ayhx7qpscxl3
#whalezapped #nostrzap #zap #nostr
thank you mate!