Fxxx all politicians🖕 nostr:note15299l5hr54k9vkrqglph0a5fegfat2a9gqwl549yxnqvuk95gp6qfe97vl

Plz, no zap on this tweet!

갑자기 궁금한점이 생겻는데요,

공항 엑스레이에 종이에 적은 글자나 플레이트에 새긴 글자는 안보이나요?

비트코인 니모닉 들고 해외이동시 공항애서 엑스레이로 검사를 하게된다면 이단계에서 니모닉이 다 노출되지 않을까 하고 갑자기 떠올랏습니다 ㅎㅎ

"Liquid is useful" is the current step for few few few #Bitcoin -ers😅

Bitcoiners: CBDC is evil! They can freeze your money!

Also Bitcoiners: USDT is useful.

Also USDT: We can freeze your money too...

#meme #memestr #nostrmemes #memes 817,460 🤙💜

GM. You can’t withdraw Bitcoin from exchange in Singapore…

I’ve spent a lot of hours analyzing “crypto” and keeping up with the fads, and to this day I still cannot find a problem that I have, and that it can solve.

Bitcoin solves my hard globally-portable savings problem. I don’t see better money than this. And that’s a big problem to solve.

Stablecoins solve some developing market intermediate-term money problems in very inflationary environments as a bridging tool while Bitcoin is still volatile. Okay. That’s big for now.

Digital collectibles are fine. I mean, I have cardboard Magic the Gathering cards worth thousands of dollars. So you buy an ape NFT and get membership to an exclusive ape club (which is like all dudes, nearly entirely devoid of women) and can show your status by displaying your supposedly elite avatar. I do see how there is a nonzero recurring interest in this sort of digital elitist collectible thing. But it doesn’t solve any of my problems or seem to be relevant on the macro scale. A niche thing that doesn’t appeal to me. Like, Pokémon might make a billion dollars but it won’t make a macro-scale trillion dollars.

DeFi is mainly about trading and leveraging worthless tokens. In a world where there are much more real-world tokens involved (eg tokenized Apple stock or whatever), then maybe there is more of a use for that. But until then it’s mainly a circular Ponzi. And even then, that industry is limited.

So almost 15 years into this industry, there have been a handful of interesting experiments, but barely anything other than bitcoin and stablecoins interests me at scale.

Beyond that, it is just things that they can empower.

Nostr, for example, doesn’t need a blockchain. There is no reason to go to the expense to maintain a global state. It certainly is empowered from the fact that Bitcoin and Lightning exist (new good money allows for new good technologies), so it’s a tangential technology.

The vast majority of “crypto” projects either don’t solve a problem, or just solve a smaller niche interest.

I like that picture, even if I only know 4 of them, Max, Adam, Jack, young glasses guy🤣

Do you know whom the rest of??

But it won't though and here is why:

The issuer of the stable coin needs to collect $1 USD to issue $1 in stable coins. They keep that dollar in the bank. If the FIAT system wasn't a corrupt bunch of bullshit that additional demand and holding would help perpetuate the USD. But FIAT is a corrupt bunch of bullshit so when they put that $1 in the bank the bank lends out .95. So there is no actual holding of those dollars because the bank doesn't have your money or theirs. They just loan it right back out actual creating more dollars in the process.

This is the correct answer.