Avatar
Connie
ae8ef5576370b5cb91d262cf0d31d5ce9f5ca26c3ad2d56d5c58f6023633e453
Curious. Always learning. Love memes. Dog-friend 🐾

A lovely little sunny day here. Lot of light rain sometimes too so my kind of day πŸ˜„

Replying to Avatar HoloKat

Merry Christmas Kat!

The final lines from Hannah Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism:

β€œBut there remains also the truth that every end in history necessarily contains a new beginning; this beginning is the promise, the only "message" which the end can ever produce. Beginning, before it becomes a historical event, is the supreme capacity of man; politically, it is identical with man's free-dom. Initium ut esset homo creatus est β€”"that a beginning be made man was created" said Augustine.

This beginning is guaranteed by each new birth; it is indeed every man.”

(Meaning: the world can always be other than it is if we decide to act.)

Merry Christmas Eshara! πŸŽ„πŸ’œπŸ«‚

Replying to Avatar Connie

Ha

So have you never eat something like that in Mexico?

Happy Christmas Eve for some of us and Merry Christmas everyone! πŸŽ„πŸ’œπŸ«‚

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

When it comes to analysis, design, or management, a critical and recurring challenge is to be able to:

1) hold two or more competing thoughts in your head,

2) but then not get stuck with decision paralysis,

3) and thus to be able to form a view and take action.

It's easy to fail in either of the first two steps.

For the first step, many people can't steel-man their opponent's view, don't take time to seriously consider competing arguments. This represents tribalism and insufficient critical thought, and has a high likelihood of being wrong. People become easy to manipulate, and where their views end up largely depends on luck of their surroundings and who managed to convince them of something earlier.

For the second step, a smaller subset of people get past the first step but then get stuck in decision paralysis or cynicism. There are too many paths, too many compelling and contradictory points. It then becomes a problem of overthinking and thus inaction. It's easier to identify problems than to build solutions, so this valley of inaction is an enticing trap that feels intellectually stimulating but leads nowhere.

The narrow path beyond those two, and what we should strive for, is to be able to do enough critical thought to the point where it starts to venture into the realm of decision paralysis, but then find a way to weigh the probabilities and form a conclusion to start taking action on, with the willingness to pivot if evidence/probabilities mount toward a different direction.

Anyway, happy Christmas Eve.

Happy Christmas Eve to you too!

Good morning! πŸŽ„πŸ’œπŸ«‚

Goodnight! βœ¨πŸ’œπŸ«‚

It’s quiet here today… maybe the time zone :)