Bitcoin going to the Moon for a treasure hunt, 62 bitcoin in a physical wallet.
(And we're already developing the technology to go up there and grab them!)
https://www.space.com/bitcoin-treasure-hunt-moon-lunar-rover
We can take this kind of situations philosophically only so much.
At some point freedom technologies become a necessity.
Imagine a technology capable of giving any civilian the ability to protect their home and family from any bomb launched at them.
Sounds like science fiction, but we are working on the essentials part of it.
Please consider joining us. No "changing the world" will be greater than this one.
Bitcoin and nostr are only tools. You need a lot more tools. Physical infrastructure, for instance.
We need decentralized satellite constellations.
#DecentralizeSpace
Thank you so much!
(Not speaking for Gravimatrix as a whole, just the personal opinion of some of us.)
This is speculation, of course, but here we go.
Year one: successful independent replications around the world.
Year five: small private companies offer cheap satellite constellations and space tourism.
Year ten: mass production of field propulsion vehicles begins. Adoption is resisted by authorities but ultimately becomes unstoppable.
Year twenty: first independent private colonies on the Moon and Mars. Asteroid mining fever.
Year twenty five: lunar coffee becomes extremely popular.
Year thirty: cost of life drops to zero, mass migration to new on- and off-planet colonies begins. Neo-conservationism, "geo-restoration."
Year one hundred: after seven decades of social experiments Terrans are finally ready to go out and explore the galaxy. Scientific bonanza boosts spiritual growth. "Need to know more."
Yes!
Breaking away in an interoperative way is possible. See for instance El Salvador. Not a total divorce yet. It is gradual and interoperative. It comes in waves. Setbacks are expected.
The spiritual laggards tend to self-destruction, as far as we can see. They are followers, not leaders. And their leaders want their destruction. It is a sad situation, and there's little we can do about it. We can only offer forgiveness and mitigation.
Yeast and flour. The majority is only temporary. Gradually then suddenly.
Your fisherman analogy is great. It'll begin like a rumor. We will let the world talk, react, hate. Meanwhile the best minds will join us relentlessly. All of a sudden you'll have entire economies flourishing thanks to irregular Field Propulsion based transportation and communications operated by small groups. They will seek for legitimacy. Small governments will see the advantages, they will grant legitimacy to those groups.
The first country to openly adopt #FieldPropulsion will dominate #decentralized #space exploration, exponentially increasing its sovereignty and independence. The field will be leveled, abusive authority will be eroded.
The Internet was not enough.
Free Open Source Software was not enough.
3D printing is not enough.
Bitcoin is good, but it is not going to be enough.
To change the world we need more technological revolutions!
#FieldPropulsion
#UnlimitedEnergy
#DecentralizeSpace
nostr:npub146k0pn8qz82wjujm2suxj8rd27tvt230gth622pmq97fcdhq8x9syfqx6l Are you also a futurist or are you just into propulsion #tech?
We got technology that has the potential to become #FieldPropulsion.
Field Propulsion has the potential to change everything, beyond our imagination.
It will happen, one way or another, eventually it happens.
But there are two things that prevent reality from becoming a better than sci-fi utopia.
The first issue is cognitive impairment of the human race. It's a complex issue, people suffer from cognitive dissonance a lot nowadays. An example: if you search for "quantum observer" on Wikipedia you will find an article that suggests (without saying it explicitly) that a conscious being observing a quantum phenomenon does not affect it unless he or she is using a physical measurement instrument to interact with it. This is untrue, but they won't accept reality because it contradicts their materialistic view of the Universe. This is only an example, but this behavior can be found at many levels across the board.
The second issue is the necessity of doing this technological upgrade in waves because of slow spiritual evolution of the human race. See for instance the case of the massive adoption of Nikola Tesla's alternating current, along with the airplane around the same years. What happened next?... We need to go slow, we can't stop, but we can't go too fast either.
What we find interesting is that thanks to issue number 1 we can address issue number 2 semi-openly because nobody is going to believe what they're not ready to believe. Isn't that an interesting paradox?
We got a window of opportunity to build infrastructure that will allow us to create a sort of open underground elite of leaders for a progressive but steady worldwide spiritual and technological upgrade. Very similar to what happened and keeps happening with Bitcoin. And just like with Bitcoin, a liberty oriented mind is a must, that's why we're here.
Another interesting paradox, now that we're talking about futurism, is that —if we succeed— money will be, for the most part, no longer necessary. Including Bitcoin!
Everything that's wrong with centralized space exploration in one headline.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-67022619
#DecentralizeSpace #DecentralizedSpace
What would you do if you had #FieldPropulsion?
Yes, it could be, but you also need physical infrastructure.
We must have the ability to launch satellites to low orbit.
Rockets are too expensive, dangerous and complicated. We need something better.
They should invest in #FieldPropulsion
More promises! Let's build them now! Support our project.
https://www.forbes.com.au/news/innovation/nasa-houses-on-moon-2040/
50 years without touching the life of the average human.
Decentralization is the only way to democratize space exploration.
We can do it with #FieldPropulsion, help us spread the message!
Field Propulsion fixes this.
#FieldPropulsion #DecentralizeSpace #DecentralizedSpace
nostr:npub146k0pn8qz82wjujm2suxj8rd27tvt230gth622pmq97fcdhq8x9syfqx6l I read your "About" page and I felt like we have shared perspectives. Right up until it said "It must come from Humanity as a whole."
That is an objective impossibility and an inherently wrong minded way of looking at the world. Transformational, paradigm shifting break-throughs have always come from either an individual or a small group. On this planet, the conditions only ever improve and the world of opportunity is only ever expanded by the few, while the many violently oppose and resolve to claw their way back into the dirt dwelling ways of nature and mindlessness, any lover of creational venture and progress in tow.
Failure to understand that you are NOT the majority and that the majority DESPISES any kind of futuristic values or display of ability to manipulate matter according to the will of a Self - and schemes against it - will destroy your project. This is in fact the problem with libertarian endeavors - the assumption that everyone is "really" a libertarian "deep down" and would contribute positively to the movement if not somehow brainwashed. It is an inability to acknowledge that we are the few and adopt forth-flowing worldviews and tactics. It is an inability to act in one's own interest and value set.
While you are right about the need to decentralize the research and development of futuristic systems, it is BECAUSE of "humanity" - collective and universal mindedness - that you cannot progress though highly public or visible channels. You are having the problem of limitation and stagnation because you are not allowed to do anything without the permission, good feelings, and "safety" of the collective, yet dissidents insist on a commitment to the interests of the collective.
Break out of this universal crap and adopt the attitude of war and rebellion. Build the community of those you can trust and work seriously despite collective disapproval. Humanity and their natural desires and affinities or evolutionary conditions are the enemy.
Thank you. Much appreciated comment.
Yes, it is hard, it is that hard. I'm glad you understand, it's hard finding people who understand the situation as it is.
Look at what's happening today with electric cars, we could say that there is an opportunity for fulfillment of the promise of Free Energy from the 80's and 90's. This is not a coincidence. It's the result of the sacrifice and work of thousands of innovators, enthusiasts and scientists through the last decades. John Bedini comes to mind.
I know it doesn't look too promising now but think about it for a second. What prevents anyone now from using free-energy devices (like the Kapanadze device, or Testatika, for example) to charge their electric vehicles? EV's are everywhere nowadays.
At first it is going to happen in an underground sort of way. But it's gonna happen eventually, and it is going to be massive.
So this Free Energy stuff is soon to become "the past", not "the future" anymore. We want to stay one step ahead.
Take a look at APEC for example
We're not the only group working on stuff like this. Chekurkov in Russia, Undefined Technologies in Florida, etc. It's happening. Field propulsion is coming, one way or another, and we don't want to miss the boat.
Hard FOMO.