GM
It is my birthday 🥳
I am looking forward to dinner at the steakhouse 🥩🍴
GM ☕️⚡️💜 
The mind once enlightened cannot again become dark.
Thomas Paine
Testing Aqua Wallet.
The transition from L-BTC to onchain BTC is only showing the liquid fee, neglecting onchain fees. As a result, the "You will receive" field incorrectly suggested a decrease of just 265 sats for the swap. In reality, the overall reduction was 9,691 sats. Notably, the onchain fees displayed by mempool.space were only 3,959 sats.
Who can explain this discrepancy?
nostr:npub1excellx58e497gan6fcsdnseujkjm7ym5yp3m4rp0ud4j8ss39js2pn72a nostr:npub1ajlrwgfj4yerhqf7ady03h7wmtk2qr3gs7h3sxcx83k05yld36sswpzx3q nostr:npub1jg552aulj07skd6e7y2hu0vl5g8nl5jvfw8jhn6jpjk0vjd0waksvl6n8n
Furthermore, I would appreciate the inclusion of a fourth option, allowing me to manually set the network fees when sending bitcoin on chain. The current "High priority" option appears inaccurate and could lead to an unnecessary overpayment. 
Testing Aqua Wallet.
The transition from L-BTC to onchain BTC is only showing the liquid fee, neglecting onchain fees. As a result, the "You will receive" field incorrectly suggested a decrease of just 265 sats for the swap. In reality, the overall reduction was 9,691 sats. Notably, the onchain fees displayed by mempool.space were only 3,959 sats.
Who can explain this discrepancy?
nostr:npub1excellx58e497gan6fcsdnseujkjm7ym5yp3m4rp0ud4j8ss39js2pn72a nostr:npub1ajlrwgfj4yerhqf7ady03h7wmtk2qr3gs7h3sxcx83k05yld36sswpzx3q nostr:npub1jg552aulj07skd6e7y2hu0vl5g8nl5jvfw8jhn6jpjk0vjd0waksvl6n8n
GM 
That spike 😳 
