GRATEFUL FOR YOU MY FRIEND 🧡#GRATEFULCHAIN

FYI, A SLOW MOTION RUN IS CALLED A WALK. WE ARE EXPERIENCING A GLOBAL BANK WALK.

I read these books to reach this conclusion. Maybe if you read the same books you will not use the word hopium anymore.

Human Action - Ludwig von Mises

Anatomy of the state - M Rothbard

The law - F Bastiat

Broken Money- Lyn Alden

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism - Robert P. Murphy

Principles of Economics - S. Ammous

Early Austrian economics - Israel Kirzner

Check your financial privilege - A Gladstein

The theory of money and credit - L von Mises

Keynes Hayek - Nicholas Wapshott

Bitcoin is Venice - A Farrington & S Meyers

A history of money and banking in the usa - MN Rothbard

The Revolution - Ron Paul

The history of money - Jack Weatherford

Democracy: the god that failed - HH Hoppe

Economics in one lesson - Henry Hazlitt

The 7th property - Eric Yakes

When money dies - Adam Fergusson

The price of tomorrow - Jeff Booth

The bitcoin standard - Saifedean Ammous

The fiat standard - Saifedean Ammous

21 lessons - der Gigi

Principles for dealing with the changing world order - Ray Dalio

Layered money - Nik Bhatia

Economics for real people - Gene Callahan

The black swan - NN Taleb

Superforecasting - Tetlock & Gardner

The sovereign individual - Davidson & Rees-Mogg

The bullish case for bitcoin - Vijay Boyapati

Rules for radicals - SD Alinsky

As a landlord, yes, this is what inflation has done to us. Our ability to provide reasonably priced housing is increasingly out of reach.

I want a tenant who will pay in Bitcoin. That would be the best.

Same nostr:note1t8q8e6wj3a5pkt0830ckm43e4nd07vn7etv5uwxfryrxy82fnyusljpc6v

I have to respect their privacy

Depend on their privacy policy

FWIW, I think deletions on Nostr are a "meh" idea and edits are a bad idea. Consider the following:

- It's an additional layer of complexity. Nostr should arguably be simpler and it's already more complex in some ways centralized platforms are not.

- Different relays will disagree on whether to accept the edit or the delete event, so the original note may stay available. It may also become apparently unavailable and then available again in the future. Someone could send the old version to relays you don't use.

- Unlike some specific features like articles, zaps and whatever one can think of, it only makes sense if consistently implemented, but that's something we can only assume to be true of NIP-01.

- It makes retrieving a note less efficient. You now need to wait a response from all relays, just in case one of them has a deletion or a modification the first one to reply doesn't have.

- There is value in having modifications, but there is also value in having platforms that don't allow modifications, IMO, where an ID truly identifies a specific piece of text and nothing else. Now that Twitter allows modifications, Nostr can use the fact that it doesn't to diversify itself so as to convince users to use both (otherwise the network effect plays against Nostr).

On centralized platforms which allow modifications, users sometimes write a post with the plan of modifying it later. On Nostr that would be a bad pattern, however and I think the modification features can lead to bad usage of Nostr and, therefore, a bad user experience.

Ultimately it will prevail if clients and relays implement it and fail otherwise, but I'm not in favor of it.

I was invited to a bdsm party 👀

😂🤣

🧐 i wonder if me verifying through nip05 changed things

It says service to this lightning address is not available.