Why genuine users would even think of trying Nostr if it becomes another one spammed network? Same as X, just that noone is using, except of few nerds.

I like the idea, interesting to think about. Simple enough to get widespread adoption:

If you have "proof of stake" in a BTC wallet, lets say 100ksat, then sign your npub with the wallet private key and post the pubkey and signed message to your profile, then if someone steals your nostr nsec you can sign a new npub with the same wallet, then your identity follows your cold sats rather than an nsec that has to be hot.

If you want to shut down your profile, just spend the sats to another wallet.

If an identity misbehaves, you can ban the wallet address so they can't just create a new npub and keep spamming you. If they move their funds to a new wallet, well then they just paid a transaction fee to create a new identity.

Now your client and/or relay can set a "minimum identity stake" so you only are talking to people that are serious.

I laid out my reasons in this recent thread. Somehow you missed out on it.

As for the nostrpedia ah that's too much effort feel free to do it yourself.

nostr:note1zp6kj383zwsdvap3uhdv7c23tyvxdvg2s770thme7zhxey6qa03qqsqwec

He needs to get Satoshi affirming surgery then.

You don't have to constantly rethink it, as I wrote you can create some software UI on your end that automates this. Like a rules engine. Example: Automatically re-post all notes with a certain hashtag until the rules gets manually canceled. However that's something that's strictly on your (sending) client end and don't need to concern the relays or receiving clients.

As for replies in threads, the sending (posting) client sets the expiration date but it's up to the relays and receiving clients to interpret it. It's more like a hint than a mandate. We can't mandate deletion anyways we've had that discussion. So a relay could keep expired notes around if they're required for thread integrity, but receiving clients should highlight the fact they're expired e.g. by graying out.

We need to arrive at some set of conventions across the ecosystem.

I'm in favor. Let the controversy begin!!!

nostr:note19ks72mztjnuqj0rmc6036at2d3k43etlev2y8fvna4k7c3ltph5slxfr2p

Thx!

Fair enough! You make a good point. I guess Citadels and international waters will have to do for now. 🫡💯

Looking forward to being in true Bitcoin land. 💯🙏🏽

Bitcoin?

RE: Big Data and State invasion of privacy, overreach, manipulation, and population control.

There is a fast approaching point of no return. Resist. Unite. Amplify the voices of those who have been silenced. Take a stand. Fight for your rights. Rebel while you still can.

#cybersecgirl #freedomofspeech #privacy

What countries besides El Salvador should plebs consider moving to?

I don't wanna pay taxes and I want clean food and water without any chemicals or any of that synthetic garbage.

The basics

It's because it's a free relay. Probably not the only relay that stuff is being uploaded to.

Nostr is not affiliate-scammed to death like bitcoin is, making it a better vehicle for onboarding normies.

Spam and illegal content get in, but they can't get out.

Input from unknown sources gets stalled in a moderation queue and not served back out (except to authorized users of the relay, they can see it). So if someone replies to you, you immediately see it, but others watching the conversation don't see it until it passes moderation.

This means I can moderate "lazily", I don't have to be on edge ready to quickly take something down.