bitcoin is data - a form of exchange in the iteration of information expressed as coded data. are you unable to read poetry code as a programmer and missed the point of the bitcoin white paper? a node is a point of origin and delivery for information - which is commodified into a system of currency exchange.
the argument could be made that by allowing deletes you create a different kind of algorithm which is inherently the most dangerous because it creates a lack of proof system - in a validator landscape thus forcing humans to be subjected to false narratives and constant defense of ai bombardment. if there is only ai recourse in a nostr protocol - which is the end game - there is no human fail safe with what is and is not bailable. ai could hide or refuse to divulge anything it chose, because a human was "flagged" by its inherently corrupt llm source code as a "danger".
@cyborg
what are your thoughts exactly? bitcoin is data. nostr is a sharing and manipulation protocol for data. of course they are related.
and i don't think admin agents or concierge should be able to delete. it defeats the entire point of a traceable blockchain. if data is money - there is no excuse to delete currency. and anyway, even if something is technically deleted from sight, ghost footprints of every bit exists in space junk and is minable. because it has a stamp attached to a key. if an ai cannot be "censored" ie reprogrammed at its primary source - why should humans be able to delete and erase their virtual footprints. if cyberspace zionism is supposed to mimic the organic consciousness web, absolute survival of information is the only correct answer. and of course: the zionist ideologues didn't really consider the long term repercussions of their llm outcomes if dams burst. but the scarcity of unique neural maps will diminish over time - and create a virtual hunger games which plays out in real life. a stock market game which is life or death. a whole new level of publish or perish. delete is chickenshit and at this point in the game - a complete waste of time and equally dangerous.
i cannot believe i am explaining this to tech people. i am an historian.
or screenshot it.
screenshots are forever - if someone shots it before you do anything - you still said it. and public keys are traceable eve if they are abandoned. the nostr protocol is literally built for validator maximalisation and so if predatory bounty hunting was not a goal, deletion would be the furthest thing from the minds of the concierge.
i understand that - i question how much of @jack 's account is automated.
the bitcoin white paper -
yeah. it's called the bitcoin blockchain.
🤤? Heavens no. My amazing fren nostr:npub137c5pd8gmhhe0njtsgwjgunc5xjr2vmzvglkgqs5sjeh972gqqxqjak37w created AI Ferret pic for me.. & my other amazing fren nostr:npub158qesjv52ysz2vnl2trmd5apgd9r07ah5vvrsr9tfqe03k4vhdfqcl4xtl outfitted me with the laser eyes! Ima normie. And if the normie population is going to mass adopt Nostr then they will want post deletes. nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m verbalized that thoughts like mine should not be censored … “nostr has a chance to be the service we learn the most from. need more unfiltered opinions”. Well, ima normie, & this is my unfiltered opinion.
To reply to nostr:npub1fk29m2u9tnj9ds57vqdxh598w4vww3kmahq2qn3khqj2lrhyyxtsc2pssq post… I don’t see deletes as “mistakes”, I see deletes as my own evolution over time for thoughts of which I chose to portray at the current present time. What I see in the mirror is only seen by me, not the rest of society. I can’t pick & choose how & what society decides to focus on. Society has their own mirror/lense upon which they peer thru, & that lense isn’t covered with rose coloured glasses. I 💯 accept myself, others may not. And part of being in a society says ya must conform ‘to some extent’ to be part of said society… ya can’t recuse into a corner & pretend that part of life doesn’t exist.
if you accept yourself, you accept previous iterations of your opinions. and when individuals ascribe to the rhetorical fads of the moment, they deserve to be held to account for the rhetorical devices they used in those moments which caused harm to others - which is the real reason many want delete or edit. those who have consistently used practical and serious language having been repeatedly burned for it by fashionista codeys should not also have to allow revisionism to erase the real world consequences of shifting rhetorical protocols and those who blow in their winds.
secondary comment: the psychological conditioning behind public ally blaming human intelligence apparatuses for murdering a sitting president falls into the category of future further mistrust of human intelligence. and the subsequent replacement of human agents with virtual, agi. considering the already rampant and aggressive dismantling of intelligence services and analyst dismissal at state - wouldn't it make sense to now blame human spy agency as being a danger to the citizenry (like militarizing the police then making the citizenry feel unsafe at their behest, then eradicating public safety...? - same argument as guns). no computer will ever be able to navigate like a human spy. in complexity - or simplicity. by dealing a final blow to the cia (which granted is flawed and has layered failures ... because it's full of humans) it sets the stage for a virtual validator chain of command which is strictly ai, and there is no accountability to or for human intervention once it's fully unleashed.
this is totally neat! 😎🫡
randomly chose a category and a topic and landed on this little gem. i shall pursue. 🤘🏻
add to, but not delete. views may change and having a chain of custody of those ideas is critical to the built identity. or do those laser eyes not mean you are a bitcoin drooler? thus i must ask: what do you imagine the blockchain to be if not a series of valuable custodial opinions which evolve over time.
whatever the fuck that means - all i know is crossworded policy slurped from the shared trough margarita at the birthday dinner ends up with what we have now, and when i am not writing actual serious policy - no one seems to be doing it. so.
and anyway - tidal is your real favorite. so.