I got claustrophobic just watching the virtual tour. 😂
At the candle that gets us to $150k people will start asking “wHaT iS hApPeNiNg!?” Most will ape in near $250k which is probably close to this cycle’s peak.
Pain. Bitcoin is constant pain. 
The cool thing about golf is that the embedded creativity and optionality means you never master it, even if you play your best round. There is always a shot you could have done differently, played the wind differently, hit a putt differently, chose iron instead of driver off the tee.
And you play against yourself - other people too, sure - but mostly against yourself.
Because expectations can widely vary depending on who you are, what your life experience has been, and your level of play - you playing bogey golf might be the equivalent to a PGA tour professional making the cut. Winning a club championship could feel like winning the Masters. Shooting over 100 might feel like Tiger Woods missing a cut.
That damned, little white ball.
Yeah, it’s because class of 2021 is still waiting for the validation that the aggressive allocation for the last 3-4 years was worth it.
Every other bitcoiner class has gotten that windfall experience…where they’re free and clear of their cost basis by an order of magnitude (or more).
We’re about 6 months post halving…class of 2021 should be a lot less anxious after the rip.
Other hobbies? Golf. That’s about it.
I don’t think that is accurate. A lot of rich people who had gold reserves collateralized their gold for bank loans which were in turn invested in “guaranteed” priority debt claims on projects … which also included yields on projects.
Debt (priority) claims are very attractive for numerous reason on a sound money standard.
I disagree. Because (modern) equity requires governance control. Most modern “entrepreneurs” are cucked by their equity investors. Public and private and venture equity…they all control the entrepreneur.
A good entrepreneur worth a damn won’t part with the equity. Which means most entrepreneurs will seek debt funding (priority claims) vs. giving up control and upside of their ventures.
I’ve very curious to see when there will be another major fiat event and what it will be. It has been awhile since the March 2023 bank failures. Feels like we’re due.
🫂
Yes, what has you befuddled?
In that case, I think your view and nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak ‘s view are very similar.
How is he wrong?
Debt is a priority claim on an asset. If the cost of capital is 20%+ on a bitcoin standard, there will be a helluva less debt and more equity funding of assets & companies.
Bitcoin doesn’t end debt but it dramatically reduces the incentive to fund via debt vs. equity.
A few thoughts I’ve developed regarding taking loans out against a bitcoin stack:
(1) only to acquire proven, cash flowing assets / companies
(2) only assets / companies you’ll have complete governance control over - do what you want with them when you want to do it
(3) only acquire near the bottom of the bitcoin bear cycle
In 10 years, social security will be close to bankruptcy. If the traditional finance & political world is going to embrace bitcoin as a financial asset, it probably happens in the next 10 years.
Extremely spicy Mexican food. Started out manageable and escalated quickly. I got a little cocky, TBH.
I ate too much tonight. AMA.
Saylor is arguing risk-free yield. That is binary…there is no risk-free yield in bitcoin.
No more dumps. nostr:note13vzsuzzclx7vjkwfnyx499wepfp9c9k7d07yxtklpfra0l90x09smtrccf
I listened to nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak and nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m's recent podcast, which sparked controversy for many listeners on the issue of BTC yield.
My takeaway is that both sides can be valid in the non-binary world we live in.
Someone like Saifedean would keep his Bitcoin in cold storage, avoiding any risk for yield. On the other hand, someone like Saylor might choose to risk a portion of his Bitcoin for yield.
There’s no right or wrong, just differing risk appetites and approaches to risk management.
In the future, corporations like banks will offer institutional-grade Bitcoin yield products, unlike what we saw with Celsius and BlockFi.
This future will coexist alongside Bitcoin in cold storage, and it’s a wonderful scenario where capitalism provides users with options. I don’t view it as a bad or fiat like idea.
“Institutional-grade” fiat only lasts so long under a bitcoin standard.
