Avatar
Delta, Dirac
c1e7fc21b4f9c199e6086e095639f0f16a4e4884544547ce8a653ed7b5b6c4a7
I must see fiat fall so there may be a sound econo-calculus and true techno-industrialists can proceed in their work unimpeded. Crusader against technofaggotry. @DeltaClimbs on twitter 1-arm-chinup nationalism

Need to get out of this communist hellhole. They are refusing to serve non-overcooked burgers and when I was comparing them to Nazis for just following orders, some other dude walked by and told them they don't do burger patties by themselves. 😭

Some cards offer 1% or so sats back, but did you know, for every sat you don't spend, you get 100% back? Spend 10% more because you turned spending into a game and you're in the hole 9%. Rekt. Just hodl.

Lmao.

CCP and Russia love seeing their undermining of American sovereignty playing out so effectively.

Every time I hear a baby crying, I can understand its screams perfectly: "why are you feeding me this fiat poison, which brings me great pain and suffering?" I am sorry, baby, I'm hodling as hard as I can. The fiat will be over soon. 😢

Literally Keynesians. "The wealth is IN the monetary substrate." Fucking retards.

2.5 million sats. Quite good value laptop, good for outdoor use (450 nits QHD). Will accept the first zap in that amount as a valid contract (add 100k sats to ship. US only). Must zap by this Saturday since I need to know to fly with it.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

Obsession with scale is a fiat disease.

Seeking to get big when you're profitable makes a lot of sense. You can make even more money by scaling up. But what's really odd these days is that a lot of people want to scale even when they're not profitable.

Anyone with a modicum of common sense can figure out that this is not a good idea. If you multiply a negative number by a large number, you get an even bigger negative number. You're only going to lose more money. And that's true. You will lose more money, in a sound money economy.

In a fiat economy, things are a little different. If you're growing, that can be leveraged for additional loans on the potential to make a profit eventually. There's a lot of newly printed money floating around and it debases constantly, so more people are willing to take risks with their money. So malinvestment is common and unprofitable companies can suck in a lot of it.

Not all of these companies are bad, of course. Amazon famously made no profits for years to scale up. But for every Amazon, there's buy.com, boo.com, pets.com and so on. It's a gamble like with any unprofitable business. Sometimes you hit, sometimes you don't. The point is that the new money entering the economy often goes to stupid things and big things are what get attention. Thus everyone tries to scale massively.

Under sound money, profitability is first. You don't want to be losing something that's scarce. Thus, delaying scaling to maintain profitability is the logical choice. Businesses grow more slowly and cash infusions are much less common. That means they are generally much more hardened to market disruptions, because they last.

Family businesses used to last many generations. Heck, many last names today reflect the occupation of the ancestors that had a long-lasting business. A profitable venture that lasts is something you hold onto. It's also what we should be focused on instead of the fly-by-night, scale fast, rent-seeking culture we live in.

Sound money businesses will be very different than what we're used to.

Some days it feels like Jimmy Song is one of a small handful of bitcoiners who actually understand and appreciate the implications of Bitcoin. Seems like these basics are seldom found among a lot of the recent loud voices.

nostr:nevent1qqsdrt7qv02tykf6jtr237wys8sltlpxd74kl8s5pjhyzxs97gxa6wspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczypan77qrw5r5daz4gyazy8uqje0wed577vy096k3m2yuctyfzt5ksqcyqqqqqqgepvr6a

Sounds cool, but I think it's already taken

Is this mountain I summited "beneath me"? In 10,000 years I will be long forgotten and the mountain will still be around. I am no one to claim anything, so today I used my nym in place of my gov nym on the register, which I think I shall do going forward.

Seems Bits support is starting to reach critical mass and with the large number of people pointing out why it will win, perhaps it makes sense to have a bits maxi coming out day?

Soon, dare I say, there will be... 100 supporters. 😅

I'm dumb and didn't put a purchase link at the top of the page too, which is especially important since I couldn't get a visually prominent embed from BTCPayServer on this site given use of Carrd. You can check again now, or direct store link: https://btcpay.getchroma.co/apps/4ToHZxCVD7UW5wEvkfjKq5S22VYY/pos

Fun fact: round things roll.

How you gonna roll a cube?

You need some balls to ROLL your own entropy.

Get yours today!

https://21baller.com

Because I previously fucked up. 8 months after Achilles tear, still giving me issues, and I'm getting worried it could be permanently debilitating if I am not more diligent about maximizing healing.

All right, let's see how my attempt to restart carnivory goes.

Replying to Avatar Shawn

Solid.

I got kicked out eventually 🤣

Has anyone memorized the entire white paper? 🤔 Seems like it might be a fun thing to work on.

Spain: "we want to end cryptography"

Cryptography: *ends Spain* 😈

Underrated combo. Raw steak + raw honey is also pretty good. Pretty much the only way I eat tenderloin is raw

What a little soy-filled bitch

Would you not be worried about having seed material on a more complex PC with greater theoretical attack surface?

All right, I made a thing. 2048 balls. Check it out.

Is it really "rolling" your own entropy if you don't use round balls? 🤔

Only 24 units available for now (saving 1 for nostr:npub1rtlqca8r6auyaw5n5h3l5422dm4sry5dzfee4696fqe8s6qgudks7djtfs since the concept was entirely his idea). 😅

https://21baller.com

This is every Bitcoin conference 😂

To accost the man who proclaims bitcoin fixes everything with interrogation as to the particular nature of some problem (though usual trivial) is to misunderstand the stochasticity and path ambiguity by which inventiveness occurs, it is a failure to understand the nature of life itself.