Subnostr

Rsync🦀

c1fe52f8f5f40415e8237711ae4369fd4ecf753c995b512f49a1b26b8da18569

₿itcoiner, Entrepreneur, Junior Engineer, Building AI & Robotic Labs

https://ai-robotic-labs.github.io/ai-robotic-labs/

Rsync🦀 2y ago

CoinJoin + Taproot 🥕🌪️ #bitcoin

Rsync🦀 2y ago

#bitcoin

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/Ostorlab/KEV

Rsync🦀 2y ago

#bitcoin

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://stacker.news/items/388884

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/SeedSigner/independent_custody_guide

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://stacker.news/items/388269

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/0xBEEFCAF3/p2p-FROST

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29247

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/pull/2095

Rsync🦀 2y ago

👀 https://github.com/benthecarman/bitcoin/pull/2

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/TBD54566975/web5-dart

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/984

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/986

Devs, scientists, technologists, cypherpunks. I want to follow you.

Send 👋 👇

Rsync🦀 2y ago

👋

Rsync🦀 2y ago

https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/pull/45

NIP-57 is already quite complex though and the ecash zap flow might be significantly different though

Rsync🦀 2y ago

In my point of view, NIP-57 is simple. But if you’re saying is necessary create more one NIP for Ecash(Fedimint/Cashu), let’s go 🙂

Rsync🦀 2y ago

#tech

Rsync🦀 2y ago

I think isn’t necessary create NIP about Ecash, only add more one info into NIP-57 nostr:note1q89z60dx04qg6zekvruwjv6e74e3wphlxspjfxssdzykvu97twsq4pnely

gitpear by nostr:npub1zel8lcq6w6mtajwj4xcedvvvwts4p6v9l045dmn9rp570dqry7zsyll0dt #SovEng

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=720x1235&blurhash=%5D384xq_400M_4TRhxuoNRiozt0xuWHRjoc.7tRMzj%3Bj%3D%3FZogN1obWA%25fogIWR-xq4mxt%25NRit8RiRkt8t7RjIURjt8t7oI&x=685241f50114cbf782cd42a2e89a93361c8dabbd0ac55f7793aa2b68ecd80be3

Rsync🦀 2y ago

🤯🤯

Load More