Now that you know why Nxt was created, you should choose which path to follow. The easiest one is to repeat the history of Bitcoin in the hope that something will change. The alternative is to implement Transparent Mining and try to handle people's imperfections. The latter can't be done with pure math, and even if you manage to find some applicable laws, you can't be sure that those laws won't change in the future.

BCNext has departed permanently. He doesn't feel responsible for the future of Nxt. He implemented an idea that was obvious, but nobody else tried to do it (maybe because the creation of a Bitcoin clone was much easier). One day he will return with his main project, under his real name. Don't try to learn the real identity of BCNext. He intentionally copied the styles and ideas of different people. If you think you've found him, you are likely wrong. BCNext never existed. This "sock puppet" was created only for Nxt, and will never appear again.

The plan always was very simple - to show a path that very obvious but was avoided for some reason. BCNext doesn't pretend that he possesses sacral knowledge and knows what is awaiting in the end. You are left on your own. Good luck. Now that you know why Nxt was created, you should choose which path to follow. The easiest one is to repeat the history of Bitcoin in the hope that something will change. The alternative is to implement Transparent Mining and try to handle people's imperfections. The latter can't be done with pure math, and even if you manage to find some applicable laws, you can't be sure that those laws won't change in the future.

BCNext has departed permanently. He doesn't feel responsible for the future of Nxt. He implemented an idea that was obvious, but nobody else tried to do it (maybe because the creation of a Bitcoin clone was much easier). One day he will return with his main project, under his real name. Don't try to learn the real identity of BCNext. He intentionally copied the styles and ideas of different people. If you think you've found him, you are likely wrong. BCNext never existed. This "sock puppet" was created only for Nxt, and will never appear again.

The plan always was very simple - to show a path that very obvious but was avoided for some reason. BCNext doesn't pretend that he possesses sacral knowledge and knows what is awaiting in the end. You are left on your own. Good luck.

1% of the world has the money. Does that mean that I work for that one percent if I wasn’t born in that one percent?

I guess you know why nobody really wants to work anymore.

1. Proof-of-Capacity (PoC) Mining: Signum Network utilizes the PoC consensus algorithm, which relies on hard drive space rather than computational power. Miners allocate their available storage space to generate cryptographic proofs, which determine their chances of mining new blocks and earning block rewards. This approach is energy-efficient and allows for broader participation in the mining process.

2. Block Rewards and Token Issuance: Miners who successfully mine blocks are rewarded with SIGNA coins. These block rewards serve as an incentive for miners to contribute their storage capacity to secure the network. The rate of new token issuance is determined by the network’s protocol and parameters, which helps control inflation and the overall token supply.

3. Transaction Fees: In addition to block rewards, miners may also receive transaction fees for including transactions in mined blocks. Transaction fees serve as an additional incentive for miners and help prioritize transactions on the network.

4. Token Utility: SIGNA serves multiple purposes within the Signum Network ecosystem. It can be used as a medium of exchange for transactions, a store of value, and a means of participating in the network’s governance. The utility and demand for SIGNA are influenced by factors such as network adoption, the availability of applications and services built on the network, and the overall ecosystem’s growth.

5. Decentralized Exchanges: SIGNA can be traded on various decentralized exchanges (DEXs) that support its trading pairs. The price of SIGNA on these exchanges is determined by supply and demand dynamics, and market participants’ trading activities.

6. Community and Adoption: The success of Signum Network’s economics relies on community engagement, active participation, and adoption. As more individuals, businesses, and developers join the ecosystem and utilize SIGNA for various purposes, it can potentially increase the token’s value and overall network utility.

It’s important to note that the specifics of Signum Network’s economic model may have evolved since my knowledge cutoff in September 2021. Therefore, staying updated with the latest information and consulting official Signum Network resources will provide the most accurate and current understanding of its economics.

Aspartame cause cancer but it’s safe that’s like saying aspartame safely causes cancer what the fuck

Hello, is anybody there?

So whatever happened with the writers strike!🤷🏼

How about this we all live in this world you do you and I’ll do me I won’t hurt you you don’t hurt me.

Thanks for looking

I believe this to be true…. nostr:note1g3dfaawtpqlyzm2dzdee9rp8llfrmkeas9ex83n3hmrausgzsu3qurqg8j

Definitely unsung…. nostr:note1htn2ewzg26v6c5228pms6y7u04jce5edy5l9q06jdu9e2k0yac5syu5wtf

I made this…. nostr:note16e5ddxj3u4w7k437792u90ywgne25tswl7hmdjjdk6t6200mn5pqjm6wh7

3,.700,000 acres of forest in Canada burned where are we going to hide now?

So, as long as we still have the app on our phone, we’re good, but nobody else will be able to put it on there, correct ?

So, as long as we have the app on our phone, we will still have it, but you will not be able to get it from the App Store anymore. Is that what I’m hearing?

I can’t wait till we can use CIGNA to zap people

Yup nostr:note15p8rphe9zkawxmhyxseazyrakk0d6sysuez038p02g2z4yyssz6svu756t

Good day….

Thanks for trying

Just thought I’d throw this out there….

lnbc101pjfp0mgpp5gefw0tx8ejaffccq9cdm7xuegcdmtra33ywkg0ukvf33cc2mv54sdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzzsxqyz5vqsp5dxwp6kgnwjt334wrscrmzre6elwrvk4plh8t9etgze4ag94xdeas9qyyssqf4dka8yr546cxjcellxy0fdjv3exwve6dcpr7m2c3r5t58j2afc8jz5qqmqn0yqfcwpjq5vz982hjaat275nql4gpvd3r9fhxs22zlsq933n2n

I thought for privacy

Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties. The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to.

Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction has knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases, personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am. When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot selectively reveal myself; I must always reveal myself.

Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.

Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.

We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.

We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.

We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems. We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money. Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks may practice and play with it. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.

Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act ofencryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only sofar as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe,and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.

For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy thesesystems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We theCypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceiveourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals.

The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace.

Onward.

Eric Hughes [hughes@soda.berkeley.edu]