That's a fair argument.
Still everything nuclear frightens me. After Fukushima i wouldn't approve anything like this though.
Would you do the same? 🤣
I am going to do some onion gardening and come back later. Meanwhile read this
" For me bitcoin is an asset with value, as long as there are people who believe it has value, but... I think that if it doesn't start to be used for everyday transactions, it will deflate at some point after the last halving and with a big chance to deflate till zero. If it does start being used for everyday transactions, it will need regulation at some point just like the fiat money need, and since there is not such authority... It will deflate, with a big chance to deflate till zero..."
Ok i don't disagree much with that, but i have to mention three things. First, i wrote to russian telegram channels that Putin didn't really care for the civilians that the Ukrainian Nazis bombarded in Donbass, with thousands of civilian deaths btw, and that he activated when the west went for his head and i did't got a ban. I got a ban in the opposite side because i said they were losing. Second, it was the west that banned rt and sputnik because they like censorship, while bbc which is spreading lies all the time, still operates in russia. Third, russians never claimed to be a beacon of democracy and free speech, the west does all the time and in the meanwhile, censorship, terrorist and genocide sponsors are all over the place in the west. Since we were talking about nordstream2, like said above, usa blew up your cheapest source of energy without asking you. They imposed this on you, while typically an ally. You have to know that the world believes that Germany is a puppet state now, no matter what the propaganda says in Germany. Is it wrong to say that? Something similar happened to us btw...
I have no idea. Let's say USA. Does it give us the right to say that usa is a free speech beacon? Is that what you mean all along? If so, a quick answer is Julian Assange, Gonzalo Lira etc.
Look, i really, i mean really, i don't understand what you mean.
Ok. That means, for me, there is no connection between bitcoin nostr on one hand and usa russia on the other
It's interesting, i never heard this narrative. I am really interested
I don't understand... Please explain, sounds interesting
Wai, what has bitcoin and nostr to do with russia?
Yes having alternatives is always good. Having the alternatves as the main choice is not good.
So, you say they created this problem why exactly?
Yes. You are right but hear this. A friend used to work on windmill parks. He said to me that there is a law which says that you have to bild such windmill parks as an environmental counterweight if you want to make nuclear plants. I think that's why some things happen the way they do...
I don't have much faith in bitcoin. America is in decline and there is not much free speech there. It would be very good to have a resurgence of free speech, but higly unlikely.
Why don't you want to dee it either?
There has to be big reliable sources to do that. How could this be done? By using much more expensive LNG and depend on Greek shipowners who transfer the LNG? Are you sure you want to do that?
So which large sources? Are there any that satisfy the demand?
The state of course, but that's where bad things can happen. It is true that the state tends to be corrected. Corrupted by corporations of course...